Indian Journal of Urology
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 38  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 332-

Author Reply Re: Vaddi CM, Ramakrishna P, Ganeshan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, et al. The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Indian J Urol 2022;38:191-6


Vaddi Chandra Mohan, Paidakula Ramakrishna, Soundarya Ganesan, Siddalinga Swamy, Hemnath Anandan, Manas Babu, Rakesh Panda 
 Department of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Correspondence Address:
Soundarya Ganesan
Department of Urology, Preeti Urology and Kidney Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana
India




How to cite this article:
Mohan VC, Ramakrishna P, Ganesan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, Panda R. Author Reply Re: Vaddi CM, Ramakrishna P, Ganeshan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, et al. The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Indian J Urol 2022;38:191-6.Indian J Urol 2022;38:332-332


How to cite this URL:
Mohan VC, Ramakrishna P, Ganesan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, Panda R. Author Reply Re: Vaddi CM, Ramakrishna P, Ganeshan S, Swamy S, Anandan H, Babu M, et al. The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Indian J Urol 2022;38:191-6. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 29 ];38:332-332
Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2022/38/4/332/357735


Full Text



We thank the readers for their comments. The patients were followed up for a period of mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 16.95 (0.98) months. In the given follow-up period, no case of stricture was noted. In 16.6% (4/24) of the cases, we encountered impacted ureteral stones. Our technique is not to use laser at the impacted site. Hence, ureteric stones were pushed into the kidney and then the laser was used.

We did not discuss retropulsion, maneuverability, and visibility as it was not the primary objective. Even though these factors were recorded and analyzed, these results were not included in the article, to make it simpler and clear for the readers. Stone composition was not analyzed and we have included this as a limitation of our article.

We agree that the surgeon who performed the procedures has experience of more than 5 years in retrograde intrarenal surgery. This can be a bias and has been mentioned in the article that further multicentric studies are required to have a better understanding of laser efficiency. We did not compare our data with the Holmium YAG laser and this has also been mentioned as a limitation of our study. We aim to do further randomized controlled studies, comparing the thulium fiber laser with the Holmium YAG laser.

We agree that future research is required on multiple factors, including noise levels, fatigue, and the economic impact of these procedures.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.