Indian Journal of Urology
SYMPOSIUM
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 429--433

Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy


Samuel D Kaffenberger, Joseph A Smith 
 Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, A1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37215, United States

Correspondence Address:
Joseph A Smith
Professor and Chairman, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Urologic Surgery, A1302 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37215
United States

Failure of non-surgical primary treatment for localized prostate cancer is a common occurrence, with rates of disease recurrence ranging from 20% to 60%. In a large proportion of patients, disease recurrence is clinically localized and therefore potentially curable. Unfortunately, due to the complex and potentially morbid nature of salvage treatment, radical salvage surgery is uncommonly performed. In an attempt to decrease the morbidity of salvage therapy without sacrificing oncologic efficacy, a number of experienced centers have utilized robotic assistance to perform minimally invasive salvage radical prostatectomy. Herein, we critically evaluate the existing literature on salvage robotic radical prostatectomy with a focus on patient selection, perioperative complications and functional and early oncologic outcomes. These results are compared with contemporary and historical open salvage radical prostatectomy series and supplemented with insights we have gained from our experience with salvage robotic radical prostatectomy. The body of evidence by which conclusions regarding the efficacy and safety of robotic salvage radical prostatectomy can be drawn comprises fewer than 200 patients with limited follow-up. Preliminary results are promising and some outcomes have been favorable when compared with contemporary open salvage prostatectomy series. Advantages of the robotic platform in the performance of salvage radical prostatectomy include decreased blood loss, short length of stay and improved visualization. Greater experience is required to confirm the long-term oncologic efficacy and functional outcomes as well as the generalizability of results achieved at experienced centers.


How to cite this article:
Kaffenberger SD, Smith JA. Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy .Indian J Urol 2014;30:429-433


How to cite this URL:
Kaffenberger SD, Smith JA. Salvage robotic radical prostatectomy . Indian J Urol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2022 Jan 18 ];30:429-433
Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2014;volume=30;issue=4;spage=429;epage=433;aulast=Kaffenberger;type=0