Indian Journal of Urology
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2012  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 418--423

Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent


Rajeev Sood, Nikhil Khattar, Rishi Nayyar, Sachin Kathuria, Vineet Narang, Devashish Kaushal 
 Department of Urology, PGIMER & Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Nikhil Khattar
Department of Urology, PGIMER & Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi - 110 001
India

Introduction: Radical perineal prostatectomy was the first surgery described for prostatic carcinoma (Young, 1904) but it lost its eminent status after Walsh«SQ»s description in 1982 of anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy followed by the enthusiasm in laparoscopy and now robotics. It made resurgence after it was realized in early 1990s that the pelvic lymph node dissection is needed only in selected cases. Last decade witnessed over 80 publications addressing the results and advances in the perineal approach. Strangely, centres from the subcontinent have chosen to ignore this resurgence. We describe our early experience with the technique in 35 patients and present the case for its more widespread usage. Patients and Methods: Thirty five patients of clinically localized carcinoma prostate were operated by perineal route in our institution from December 2006 onwards. All patients had serum prostate specific antigen levels less than 10 ng/ml. Results: Operating time was 2 to 3.5 hours (mean 2.5 hours). Rectal injury occurred in three patients but was closed primarily in all and none required a colostomy. Mean duration of hospital stay was four days. The disease was organ confined in 25(71%). Positive margins were seen in 5(14%) patients. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 17% patients at one year. Seventy six percent patients had achieved continence at one year. Conclusions: As the world is taking note of radical perineal prostatectomy again, with a very small learning curve, minimal invasion and good oncological control urologists from Indian subcontinent should also embrace this procedure in view of the relative limited resources available.


How to cite this article:
Sood R, Khattar N, Nayyar R, Kathuria S, Narang V, Kaushal D. Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent.Indian J Urol 2012;28:418-423


How to cite this URL:
Sood R, Khattar N, Nayyar R, Kathuria S, Narang V, Kaushal D. Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2022 Dec 9 ];28:418-423
Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2012;volume=28;issue=4;spage=418;epage=423;aulast=Sood;type=0