Indian Journal of Urology
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2008  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 498--503

Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions


Avasarala Atchuta Kameswararao, Syed Meraj Ahmed, Sujatha Nandagiri, Swati Tadisetty 
 Department of Community Medicine, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar-505 417, Andhra Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Avasarala Atchuta Kameswararao
Department of Community Medicine, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagunur, Karimnagar-505 417, Andhra Pradesh
India

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To study the risk factor profiles of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) among adolescent girls, housewives and working women and its socioeconomic and quality of life losses. 2) To undertake risk factor modifications using the adolescent girls. Design and Setting: Cross-sectional descriptive study followed by educational intervention. Statistical Methods: Cluster sampling, Proportions, confidence intervals, Chi square and t-Tests and Logistic regression. Materials and Methods: House to house survey was done in two villages and one urban ward. Seventy-five housewives, 75 working women and 180 adolescent girls were asked about the risk factors and losses due to LUTS. Three teams of adolescent girls were utilized to bring about behavioral modifications. Impact was measured through user perspectives obtained from the participants. Results: Risk factors, social, economic and quality of life losses were different among the three female populations. Overall prevalence of LUTS among the three groups is 61(18.5%). Improper anal washing technique, malnutrition, presence of vaginal discharge, use of unsanitary menstrual pads, pinworm infestation and use of bad toilets were the significant causes among girls. Presence of sexually transmitted diseases was a contributing factor among housewives and working women. Prolonged sitting the posture was also contributing to LUTS among working women. Seventy-four per cent of beneficiaries expressed that intervention is useful. Conclusions: The causes for LUTS and their consequences were differing among the three female subpopulations. Specific group level interventions using trained girls were successful.



How to cite this article:
Kameswararao AA, Ahmed SM, Nandagiri S, Tadisetty S. Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions.Indian J Urol 2008;24:498-503


How to cite this URL:
Kameswararao AA, Ahmed SM, Nandagiri S, Tadisetty S. Epidemiological differences of lower urinary tract symptoms among female subpopulations and group level interventions. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2022 May 21 ];24:498-503
Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2008/24/4/498/44256


Full Text

 Introduction



Several studies [1],[2],[3],[4],[5] revealed that Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) are common among females and more than in men. [4] The LUTS are known to cause socioeconomic as well as quality of life losses. Lowe NK in his study showed that the symptoms of vaginitis and LUTS affected military women's quality of life. [6] The importance of assessment of quality of life losses was stressed by Espuna Pons in his study on LUTS.[7] Broseta Rico observed differences in the profiles of LUTS between menopausal and young women.[8] In this study, an attempt has been made to find out the epidemiological profles of LUTS among adolescent grls,housewives and working women with an intention to modify their negative risk factors/behaviors. Socioeconomic and quality of life losses were also elicited. Educational interventions were conducted for the girls, housewives and working women based on their risk factors.

 Materials and Methods



This study included the survey and intervention phases. House to house survey was conducted in three selected clusters: two villages of Mothe and Anthergam and one urban ward of Kattarampur in Karimnagar district. One assistant professor from the department of Community medicine with the help of two lady doctors conducted the survey. These lady doctors were specially trained in the department for two days regarding interviewing the participants. The lady doctors interrogated 180 adolescent girls, 75 housewives and 75 working women. Questionnaires (see appendix) containing open-ended questions about age, occupation, literacy status, LUTS, type of the toilets used, anal washing technique after defecation, unsanitary pad usage during menses, history of pinworm infestation, presence of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), usage of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD), loss of family life, loss of sexual life, loss of public relationships, loss of leisure opportunities, working hours, loss of physical independence, loss of wages, loss of leaves, reprimands from superiors or teachers etc were filled by the lady doctors. It was tested and retested in 10% of the study population and deficiencies were rectified. Survey was completed in 15 days.

The following case definitions were utilized for the study.

LUTS considered were burning during micturition; Strangury; Pain during micturition; Increased Frequency of micturition; Urgency for micturition and Dull lower abdominal pain. [9] Anal Washing technique: Direction from front to back (anus to behind) was considered as a right technique. Washing in the direction from anus to genitals was considered as wrong technique as there was a chance of soiling the genitals with feces and scope for urinary tract infection (UTI). Malnutrition was defined as body mass index less than 19. Syndromic approach of diagnosing STD under National AIDS Control Programme was utilized for the study. Prolonged sitting was continuous sitting for more than 6 hours.

Data was analyzed for all the variables of LUTS using SPSS version 16. Proportions, confidence intervals and X 2 test and t-Tests were calculated. Contribution of the risk factors causing LUTS among females was analyzed using logistic regression models.

In the intervention phase, 60 adolescent school girls were selected to participate in the intervention. Girls were selected as they will have free time for follow-up. They were divided into three action teams according to their target group: adolescent girls' team, housewives team and working women's team. They were trained in the department using audiovisual aids for 10 days. This training was imparted in local vernacular using the lady doctors, faculty and health educators of the department. Teaching topics were selected based on the results of risk factors obtained through analysis. Training was conducted in two sessions: one general session for three days for all the 60 girls about the etiology, prevalence, prevention and management of LUTS in general. Later, the specific sessions for seven days, targeting each group with main emphasis on the risk factors found by analysis among each group were taken up. Topics on menstrual hygiene, sexually transmitted infections, anal washing technique, importance of sterile pad usage, good nutrition, care while using intrauterine devices etc were selected for behavioral modification. Adolescent girls were mainly targeted for menstrual hygiene improvement. In case of housewives, the stress was given on preventing STDs and safe sex practices. Working women were told about prevention of the occupational hazards. These points were stressed during training: Why do women have LUTS more often than men? What can I do if I have frequent LUTS? How serious are the LUTS? The following advices on preventing LUTS were given: drinking plenty of water to flush out bacteria, not holding urine, urinating when one feels to urinate, wiping from front to back after bowel movements, urinating after having sex, using enough lubricant during sex, avoiding using diaphragm if LUTS was present etc.

Pre-testing and post-testing was done to know the effect of training imparted. Impact of training to action teams was found significant in all the three teams (t df19 =2.09, P df19 = 4.262, P df19 =4.055, P 2 df4 = 14.98, P , significant P[10],[11] The reasons for this high prevalence in this study appear to be due to improper anal washing technique, using unsanitary pads during menses, malnutrition, vaginal discharge and pinworm infestation. Similar results were also revealed by other studies. [1],[5],[12] But the factors operating were different for the girls, housewives and working women. Unsanitary pads usage, improper anal washing and malnutrition were the main causes among girls. STDs, poor anal wash, unsanitary menstrual pads and malnutrition are the common ones among housewives. Working women were suffering due to prolonged sitting for more than 6 h, using bad toilets and IUCD insertion. Lazy bladder syndrome may be the reason among women with prolonged sitting occupations.

Lowe [6] and Espuρa Pons M [7] tried to assess quality of life led by patients suffering from LUTS . These losses among the three groups were also dissimilar in this study. Girls' major losses were sickness absenteeism and reprimands from teachers while the housewives lost family life and faced family and financial problems. The working women lost leisure time enjoyment, wages and leaves. Economic losses were considerable among the sufferers here as seen in a German study by Vonberg. [13] Broseta Rico also observed similar difference in the profiles of LUTS , but between young women and menopausal women. [8] As different factors were operating in these three groups, group-specific strategies for each group were used in this study. Singh MM utilized health workers to prevent LUTS.[1] Su et al. conducted similar interventions successfully in a specific group of clean room workers. [9]

Impact of intervention to bring changes in negative practices yielded good results. As a whole, almost 74% of the beneficiaries appreciated that the interventions were beneficial to them and changed their bad practices to a large extent. More than half of the beneficiaries are continuing the changed lifestyles. However, the role of hormonal factors was not studied in this study. This might be the reason for the difference between the young women and menopausal women in Broseta's study. More elaborate study on cost-effective analysis of LUTS is warranted.

To conclude, the three female groups were suffering from LUTS due to different reasons. An educational intervention through adolescent girls to bring about the reduction in risk factors was successful. This group-specific approach yielded better results.

 Acknowledgment



Our thanks to Dr. V. Samerer, MPH, Lecturer, Dr. D. Damoder MBBS; Tutor, Mr. M. Harenderrao, Statistician, Mr. K. Suryanarayana, medico-social worker of the Department for their assistance.

References

1Singh MM, Devi R, Garg S, Mehra M. Effectiveness of syndromic approach in management of reproductive tract infections in women. Indian J Med Sci 2001;55:209-14.
2Ferry S, Burman LG, Mattson B. Urinary tract infection in primary health care in northern Sweden: II, Clinical Presentation; Scand J Prim Health Care 1987;5:176-80.
3Sprava L. The role of a symptomatic bacteriuria in epidemiologic study of the urinary tract infection. Dis Mon 2004;7:23-5.
4Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infection: Incidence, morbidity and economic costs. Dis Mon 2003;49:53-70.
5Narayan BK. Puberty rituals, reproductive knowledge and health of adolescent school girls in south India. Asia Pacific Population Journal; 2002 Dec.
6Lowe NK, Ryan-Wenger NA. Military women's risk factors for and symptoms of genitourinary infections during deployment, Mil Med 2003;168:569-74.
7Espuρa Pons M, Puig Clota M. Lower urinary tract symptoms in women and impact on quality of life: Results of the application of the King's Health Questionnaire. Actas Urol Esp 2006;30:684-91.
8Broseta Rico E, Jimιnez Cruz JF. Urinary tract infection in pregnancy and menopause. Arch Esp Urol 2002;55:1165-79.
9Su SB, Wang JN, Lu CW, Guo HR. Reducing urinary tract infections among female clean room workers. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15:870-6.
10National Family Health Survey of India -2 (1998).
11Dutta DC. Text book of Gynaecology. 3 rd ed. New Central Book Agency (p) Ltd; 2001. p. 378.
12Bagga A, Tripathi P, Jatana V, Hari P, Kapil A, Srivastava RN, et al . Bacteriuria and urinary tract infections in malnourished children. Pediatr Nephrol 2003;18:366-70.
13Vonberg RP, Behnke M, Rüden H, Gastmeier P. Costs due to urinary tract infections in Germany: An estimation based on the data from the German National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Urologe A 2008;47:54-8.