Indian Journal of Urology Users online:38  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
This article has been cited by
1Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy damage rates for lower pole renal stones by laser fiber type
Connor M. Forbes,Karla A. Rebullar,Joel M.H. Teichman
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine.2018;50(8)798
[DOI]
2Utilization of the Glue-clot Technique for Removal of Small Lower Pole Calculi in Pediatric Patients: Case Series
Min Joon Lee,Priyank Yadav,Thomas de Los Reyes,Michael E. Chua
Urology.2021;50(8)798
[DOI]
3Treatment options for active removal of renal stones
G. J. J. Warmerdam,K. De Laet,R. P. W. F. Wijn,P. F. F. Wijn
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology.2012;36(3)147
[DOI]
4Lower Pole Midsize (1?2 cm) Calyceal Stones: Outcome Analysis of 56 Cases
H. Aboutaleb,M. El-Shazly,M. Badr Eldin
Urologia Internationalis.2012;89(3)348
[DOI]
5Intracorporeal laser lithotripsy
Athanasios G. Papatsoris,Andreas Skolarikos,Noor Buchholz
Arab Journal of Urology.2012;10(3)301
[DOI]
6What effect do different 200m laser fibres have on deflection and irrigation flow rates in a flexible ureterorenoscope?
Anna E. Wright,Kevin Williams,Nicholas J. Rukin
Lasers in Medical Science.2015;30(5)1565
[DOI]
7What effect do different 200m laser fibres have on deflection and irrigation flow rates in a flexible ureterorenoscope?
Sven Lahme
Lasers in Medical Science.2012;30(5)418
[DOI]
  Search 
  The Journal 
  The Association 
  Site Statistics 
  Addresses 
  e-Alerts 
  Online Submission 

Submit Articles

Alerts

Join us