|Year : 2019 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 230-231
”Polar flip” technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy – Evolution of a novel technique for posterior hilar tumors
Mallikarjuna Chiruvella, Syed Mohammed Ghouse, Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
|Date of Submission||06-Nov-2018|
|Date of Acceptance||04-May-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||2-Jul-2019|
Syed Mohammed Ghouse
Department of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad, Telangana
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Posterior hilar renal tumor extirpation by partial nephrectomy is a unique challenge for transperitoneal laparoscopy. We describe our novel technique of “polar flip” for these tumors. Kidney is rotated by around 45 -60 degrees after mobilisation so that lower pole faces anteriorly and upper pole faces posteriorly, thereby exposing the posterior surface for maneuverability. Technical highlights are hilar control, complete kidney mobilisation, initial flipping with dissection in Gil Vernet's plane to clip posterior segmental renal artery, en mass hilar clamping in normal lie, polar flipping, dissection in Gil Vernet's plane till renal sinus fat, completion of tumor excision, selective vascular ligation, renorhaphy and nephropexy.
|How to cite this article:|
Chiruvella M, Ghouse SM, Tamhankar AS. ”Polar flip” technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy – Evolution of a novel technique for posterior hilar tumors. Indian J Urol 2019;35:230-1
|How to cite this URL:|
Chiruvella M, Ghouse SM, Tamhankar AS. ”Polar flip” technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy – Evolution of a novel technique for posterior hilar tumors. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Nov 30];35:230-1. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2019/35/3/230/261929
| Introduction|| |
The field of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy has progressed from the initial reports in 1992 of transperitoneal approach and 1994 of retroperitoneal approach to the current era of selective clamping and early unclamping to preserve maximal renal parenchyma.,,, With the advent of three-dimensional reconstruction and imaging, more complex partial nephrectomies are feasible without any conversions., Various approaches have been described for hilar tumors; however, posterior hilar tumors are always a technical challenge even in the hands of skilled surgeons. We demonstrate our novel technique of “polar flip” for transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (TPLPN) for posterior hilar tumor in a patient with 3.6 cm × 3.8 cm × 3.2 cm mass [Figure 1] for [Video] with RENAL score of 10ph.
| Technique|| |
Standard positioning is done for TPLPN without prior ureteric catheterization. Ports are placed slightly caudal and lateral than standard position, so as to maneuver the dissection on posterior pole easily. Lower polar dissection is completed to identify the ureter. The ureter is separated from the lower pole to enable flipping the lower pole. Hilar dissection is completed by blunt and sharp dissection by creating windows above and below the hilum so as to control it en-mass with a Satinsky clamp.
Posterior dissection and dissection in Gil–Vernet's plane
After completion of anterior part of the dissection, the kidney is mobilized all around so that the only intact attachment which remains is the hilum. After this, the kidney is rotated by around 45°–60° so that lower pole faces anteriorly and the upper pole faces posteriorly. This leads to complete exposure of the entire posterior surface for the dissection. Gil–Vernet's potential avascular plane is then entered just posterior to renal pelvis. A posterior segmental renal artery, which is the terminal extension of the posterior division of renal artery or a direct branch from a common trunk, is a consistent vessel encountered in Gil–Vernet's plane coming from anterior side of the intrarenal pelvis to posterior side. This vessel is clipped for the deeper dissection in the same plane.
Vascular clamping and polar flip
Kidney is aligned again in normal axis for actual vascular clamping. Lateral traction on kidney just before the clamping permits clamp to be placed flush to the great vessels. After en-mass clamping, the kidney is flipped again in the previous position to have good exposure of the posterior surface of the kidney. The parenchymal lips on both sides of hilum are cut at medial side. The dissection proceeds in Gil–Vernet's plane, just flush to the posterior wall of the intrarenal pelvis. Normal anatomical structures encountered in this plane are the infundibulum of mid-posterior calyx and draining veins coming perpendicular with the intrarenal pelvis at the base. All these structures are clipped with 5-mm Hem-O-Lok® Clip as and when encountered. The deepest plane here is the renal sinus fat which guides us about the change of plane for further dissection on the opposite side of parenchyma to complete the tumor excision.
Renorrhaphy and hilar declamping
Vessels at the tumor bed are selectively ligated with Vicryl No. 2-0 in figure-of-eight fashion. Outer renorrhaphy is done using the sliding clip technique with barbed suture. After complete approximation of the parenchymal lips, the kidney is flipped back to normal axis and Satinsky clamp is removed. Reperfusion of the renal tissue is ascertained.
The kidney is fixed to the parietal wall [Figure 1], drain is placed and the specimen is entrapped in a bag and retrieved through extension of one the ports and port sites are closed.
Two cases have been operated with similar tumors. Warm ischemia time was 20 and 18 min, respectively in two cases. Total operative time in both the cases was 110 and 95 min, respectively. Histopathology in both cases was clear cell carcinoma with negative resected margins.
| Conclusions|| |
The polar-flip approach requires expertise in basic laparoscopy but can be safely performed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of this unique “polar flip” technique.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol 1993;7:521-6.
Gill IS, Delworth MG, Munch LC. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy. J Urol 1994;152:1539-42.
Shao P, Li P, Xu Y, Cao Q, Ju X, Qin C, et al.
Application of combined computed tomography arteriography, venography, and urography in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental artery clamping. Urology 2014;84:1361-5.
Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:627-32.
Gill IS, Colombo JR Jr., Frank I, Moinzadeh A, Kaouk J, Desai M, et al.
Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for hilar tumors. J Urol 2005;174:850-3.
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009;182:844-53.
Gil-Vernet J. New surgical concepts in removing renal calculi. Urol Int 1965;20:255-88.
Aron M, Turna B. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Newer trends. Indian J Urol 2009;25:516-22.
] [Full text]