|
   |
|
SHORT COMMUNICATION |
|
|
|
| Year : 2012 | Volume
: 28
| Issue : 2 | Page : 243-245 |
| |
A positive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with negative initial biopsy may predict future detection of prostate cancer
Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi1, Virendra Kumar1, Tarun Javali2, Amit K Dinda3, Sanjay Thulkar4, Naranmangalam R Jagannathan1, Rajeev Kumar2
1 Department of NMR, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
4 Department of Radio-diagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| Date of Web Publication | 13-Jul-2012 |
Correspondence Address:
Rajeev Kumar
Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.98487
 Abstract | | |
Current diagnostic modalities for early prostate cancer (PCa) lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) detects biochemical changes in tissues that may predate histological changes that can be diagnosed on a biopsy. Men with MRSI suggestive of malignancy but negative biopsy may thus be harboring cancer that manifests at a later date. We report the first case in our cohort of men with positive MRSI but negative initial biopsy who, 6 years after the initial MRSI, were detected to have PCa despite a "normal" prostate specific antigen (<4.0 ng/ml).
Keywords: Biopsy, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, prostate cancer, prostate specific antigen
How to cite this article:
Dwivedi DK, Kumar V, Javali T, Dinda AK, Thulkar S, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R. A positive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with negative initial biopsy may predict future detection of prostate cancer. Indian J Urol 2012;28:243-5 |
How to cite this URL:
Dwivedi DK, Kumar V, Javali T, Dinda AK, Thulkar S, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R. A positive magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with negative initial biopsy may predict future detection of prostate cancer. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 22];28:243-5. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2012/28/2/243/98487 |
| Introduction | |  |
Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) based screening for detection of early prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with overdiagnosis and the value of PSA screening remains controversial. [1] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is the combination of various MR techniques including conventional T2-weighted (T2W) imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI), is emerging as an important diagnostic tool for detection, localization, staging, and evaluation of treatment outcomes. [2],[3] MRSI identifies biochemical changes within the tissue that may predate the appearance of histological changes that are currently used to diagnose PCa. [4] It is thus possible that patients with MRSI suggestive of malignancy may not have biopsy detectable PCa at the time of MRSI but may develop histological cancer at a later date. We have been evaluating MRSI prior to biopsy as a diagnostic modality for PCa since 1999 and have followed up patients with positive MRSI but negative biopsy for their outcomes. We report the first case in our series that developed PCa in a follow up after an initial positive MRSI but negative biopsy, despite the serum PSA returning to normal (<4.0 ng/ml).
| Clinical Case | | |
A 56-year-old man presented with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and elevated serum PSA (8.53 ng/ml) in October 2004. His digital rectal examination revealed a grade 2, benign enlargement of the prostate. He underwent an MRSI study followed by a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided sextant and focused biopsy as per a previously described protocol. [5] The MR investigations were carried out at 1.5 T using a whole-body MR scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a pelvic-phased array coil in combination with an endorectal surface coil. After acquisition of scout images in three orthogonal planes, the position of the endorectal coil was checked on sagittal images. Following this, T1-weighted (T1W) transverse and T2W images in transverse, sagittal, and coronal planes were acquired covering the entire prostate using turbo spin-echo sequence (TR=5000 ms, TE=98 ms, FOV=280, matrix size=256 × 256, slice thickness=5 mm, without the interslice gap). The MRSI parameters used were TR=1300 ms, TE=120 ms, voxel size = 5 × 5 × 5 mm 3 , average=3, with a total acquisition time of 17 min. 3D 1 H MRSI spectral grid was superimposed on a T2W image of the prostate and two suspicious voxels demonstrated elevated levels of choline (Cho) and decreased citrate (Cit), indicative of malignancy [Figure 1]a and b. The metabolite ratio [Cit/(Cho+Cr)] for these voxels were 0.027 (right periphery mid) and 0.061 (left periphery mid), where Cr refers to creatine. The biopsy did not reveal malignancy on any of the cores sampled. | Figure 1: a: 3D 1H MRSI spectral grid superimposed on a T2-weighted (without fat-sat) image of the prostate in 2004. A small incidental neurofibroma is noted
Figure 1: b: MR spectrum obtained from the voxel showing increased Cho and decreased Cit
Click here to view |
His repeat PSA values were 6.04 ng/ml in 2005, 4.31 ng/ ml in 2006 and with no follow-up for 4 years, 4.0 ng/mL in 2010. He was managed for his symptoms and consented for a repeat MRSI study in 2010. The repeat MRSI study was carried out using the same parameters as the 2004 study. This study revealed four voxels suspicious for malignancy with [Cit/(Cho+Cr)] ratios varying from 0.147 to 0.27 [Figure 2]a and b. Although the PSA had returned to normal, due to the persistently abnormal MRSI, the patient consented for a repeat TRUS-guided biopsy (12 cores including four from the focused areas) that revealed adenocarcinoma from the right peripheral base. With a diagnosis of clinical T1c, N0, M0 PCa, the patient underwent a robotic radical prostatectomy that confirmed a Gleason score 3+3 adenocarcinoma. | Figure 2: a: 3D 1H MRSI spectral grid superimposed on a T2-weighted (fat-sat) image of the prostate in 2010
Figure 2: b: MR spectrum obtained from the voxel showing elevated Cho and decreased Cit, indicative of cancer
Click here to view |
| Discussion | | |
The use of serum PSA to screen men for PCa is fraught with a high false-positive rate. There is thus need to substratify men with raised PSA into those who are more likely to have cancer than others and therefore require a biopsy.
Among men with raised PSA, MRI techniques may help identify a subset that requires treatment. [6],[7],[8] T2W-MRI and MRSI are the most commonly used MR techniques in detection of PCa. Among the newer MR techniques, DWI is sensitive to restriction of the water molecule diffusion and provides contrast based on the translational motion of water protons in biological tissues. DCE-MRI is capable of assessing microvascular properties. All these techniques have shown the potential value in distinguishing malignant from benign prostate. [9],[10] MRSI-guided prostate biopsies may improve the biopsy yield and improve concordance between the biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason scores. [5],[11]
In our patient, it is possible that the tumor existed even in 2004 since there are suspicious areas in the MRI. The lesion was not visible on the TRUS and the biopsy (sextant plus focused) could have missed the tumor. This is an inherent limitation of the biopsy and one of the reasons that we now perform 12 core biopsies as standard.
It is proposed that metabolic changes predate histologic changes and this fact provides a window of opportunities for detecting early disease. Our patient had a "normal" PSA on his follow-up and may not have been advised a repeat biopsy. Normalizing PSA after an initial increase is a well-known phenomenon and, in fact, has been a significant finding in our cohort of men. [3] Such men would normally not be considered candidates for a repeat biopsy. In view of our previously reported findings in men with negative MRSI and negative biopsies, [3] the current report suggests that MRSI may become an important variable in deciding which patients with a negative initial biopsy should be followed-up more closely. The finding of malignancy supports our hypothesis of MRSI changes predating histologic ones and continued follow-up of our cohort of men with negative biopsies with positive MRSI may further strengthen the evidence.
Considering upto 20% chance of detecting cancer on repeat biopsy in a patient with a negative initial biopsy, it is quite possible that the detection of cancer in our patient was purely by chance and not, in any way, related to the positive MRSI. The importance of this case lies in the fact that his PSA actually declined to normal levels and this patient would not have been a candidate for repeat biopsy, were it not for the positive MRSI. It is not possible to define a role for MRSI in following up positive cases purely on the basis of this single case report but it lends credence to the need for further evaluation of this modality.
| References | | |
| 1. | Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. ERSPC Investigators. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1320-8. 
|
| 2. | Jagannathan NR, Kumar V, Kumar R, Thulkar S. Role of magnetic resonance methods in the evaluation of prostate cancer: An Indian perspective. MAGMA 2008;21:393-407.
|
| 3. | Kumar R, Nayyar R, Kumar V, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Jagannathan NR, et al. Potential of magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging in predicting absence of prostate cancer in men with serum prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml: A follow-up study. Urology 2008;72:859-63.
|
| 4. | Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Hricak H, Narayan P, Carroll P, Nelson SJ. Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm 3 ) spatial resolution. Radiology 1996;19:795-805.
|
| 5. | Kumar V, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R, Thulkar S, Gupta SD, Hemal AK, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4-10 ng/ml. NMR Biomed 2007;20:11-20.
|
| 6. | Ahmed HU, Kirkham A, Arya M, Illing R, Freeman A, Allen C, et al. Is it time to consider a role for MRI before prostate biopsy? Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2009;6:197-206.
|
| 7. | Kumar V, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R, Nayyar R, Thulkar S, Gupta SD, et al. Potential of (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging to segregate patients who are likely to show malignancy of the peripheral zone of the prostate on biopsy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:842-8.
|
| 8. | Kubota Y, Kamei S, Nakano M, Ehara H, Deguchi T, Tanaka O. The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2008;15:322-6.
|
| 9. | Le bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:469-80.
|
| 10. | Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, Jager GJ, van Leenders GJ, Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa CA, et al. Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;229:248-54.
|
| 11. | Labanaris AP, Zugor V, Smiszek R, Nützel R, Kühn R, Engelhard K. Guided e-MRI prostate biopsy can solve the discordance between Gleason score biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Magn Reson Imaging 2010;28:943-6.
|
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
| This article has been cited by | | 1 |
Magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging-directed transrectal ultrasound biopsy increases prostate cancer detection in men with prostate-specific antigen between 4-10?ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination |
|
| Tarun Dilip Javali,Durgesh Kumar Dwivedi,Rajeev Kumar,Naranamangalam Raghunathan Jagannathan,Sanjay Thulkar,Amit Kumar Dinda | | International Journal of Urology. 2013; : n/a | | [Pubmed] | [DOI] | |
|
|
|
|
