|Year : 2011 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 397-398
Familial transverse testicular ectopia unrelated to persistent Müllerian duct syndrome
Eiji Hisamatsu, Shizuko Takagi, Yoshikiyo Nakagawa, Yoshifumi Sugita
Department of Urology, Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Japan
|Date of Web Publication||26-Sep-2011|
Department of Urology, Kobe Children's Hospital, 1-1-1 Takakuradai Suma-ku Kobe, Hyogo 654-0081
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) is rare. Although several familial cases of TTE have been reported, most of them were associated with persistent Mullerian duct syndrome (PMDS), which may be inherited as an autosomal-recessive or X-linked recessive trait. We experienced two brothers with TTE unrelated to PMDS. A genetic etiology may be involved even in TTE unrelated to PMDS.
Keywords: Inguinal hernia, nonpalpable testis, transverse testicular ectopia
|How to cite this article:|
Hisamatsu E, Takagi S, Nakagawa Y, Sugita Y. Familial transverse testicular ectopia unrelated to persistent Müllerian duct syndrome. Indian J Urol 2011;27:397-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Hisamatsu E, Takagi S, Nakagawa Y, Sugita Y. Familial transverse testicular ectopia unrelated to persistent Müllerian duct syndrome. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2022 Dec 6];27:397-8. Available from: https://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2011/27/3/397/85446
| Introduction|| |
Transverse testicular ectopia (TTE) is rare. Although several familial cases of TTE have been reported, most of them were associated with persistent Müllerian duct syndrome (PMDS). We report our experience with two brothers with TTE unrelated to PMDS.
| Case Reports|| |
A 1-month-old boy was referred with a right hydrocele testis and a left nonpalpable testis. After a 7-month period of observation, he presented with a right inguinal hernia and a left nonpalpable testis. The right testis was located in the scrotum. At the time of surgery, left inguinal exploration was initially performed for the nonpalpable testis. When the left testis was delivered through the internal inguinal ring, the right testis could not be palpated in the scrotum. Laparoscopy was performed through an infraumbilical incision. No Müllerian duct remnant was found. Subsequently, right inguinal exploration revealed that the testes were connected by a common vas deferens [Figure 1]a. The tunica albuginea of each testis was rough. A bilateral testis biopsy was performed. Then, both testes were brought down through the right inguinal canal and each was placed on its respective side of the scrotum. The biopsy specimen revealed normal testicular tissue. The karyotype was 46,XY. Both testes were located in the scrotum 3 years after the surgery. Testicular atrophy was not recognized.
|Figure 1: Inguinal exploration revealed two testes connected by a common vas deferens (arrow) in the older brother (a) and the younger brother (b). Each finding appears to be symmetrical|
Click here to view
An 8-month-old boy (the younger brother of Case 1) was referred with a left inguinal hernia and a right nonpalpable testis. The left testis was located in the scrotum. Diagnostic laparoscopy was performed initially. This revealed that the right spermatic vessels and the vas deferens ran toward the left internal inguinal ring. The right testis was located just cephalad to the internal inguinal ring. No Müllerian duct remnant was found. Subsequently, left inguinal exploration revealed that the testes were connected by a common vas deferens. The tunica albuginea of each testis was as rough as that of Case 1 [Figure 1]b. Testis biopsy was not performed. Both testes were brought down through the left inguinal canal and each was placed on its respective side of the scrotum. The karyotype was 46,XY. Both testes were located in the scrotum 5 months after the surgery. Testicular atrophy was not recognized.
| Discussion|| |
TTE is an uncommon form of ectopic testis. Several theories of TTE have been proposed. Müllerian duct remnants may mechanically inhibit testicular descent.  However, no Müllerian duct remnant was found on laparoscopy in our cases. Fusion of the Wolffian ducts is also considered a plausible mechanism for cases such as ours.  The common vas deferens initially appeared to be a Müllerian duct remnant, as shown in [Figure 1]. However, our cases are unlikely to be PMDS because appendices testis were found. The cause of PMDS is considered to be lack of Müllerian-inhibiting substance (MIS) synthesis or a defective MIS receptor. , The presence of the appendices testis indicates that the MIS functioned well during the embryologic development.
Although some familial cases of TTE have been reported, most of them were associated with PMDS. There are few reports of familial TTE unrelated to PMDS. PMDS may be inherited as an autosomal-recessive or X-linked-recessive trait. , Wuerstle et al. reported two brothers among nonindentical triplets who had TTE without Müllerian duct remnant.  Our cases suggest that a genetic etiology is involved even in TTE unrelated to PMDS. The mode of inheritance is not clear in our cases because there was no family history of TTE except for the affected brothers.
Various procedures have been described for the treatment of TTE. We performed a modified Ombrédanne operation.  Orchiopexy could be performed without dividing the fused spermatic vessels and vasa deferense by this procedure.
In conclusion, TTE should be considered when an inguinal hernia and contralateral nonpalpable testis are present. A modified Ombrédanne operation is useful for TTE because it can avoid the injury of the spermatic vessels and vas deferens. A genetic etiology may be involved in TTE unrelated to PMDS.
| References|| |
|1.||Karnak I, Tanyel FC, Akçören Z, Hiçsönmez A. Transverse testicular ectopia with persistent müllerian duct syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:1362-4. |
|2.||Diamond DA. Sexual differentiation: normal and abnormal. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9 th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007. p. 3826-7. |
|3.||Bouvattier C. Disorders of sex development: Endocrine aspects. In: Gearhart JP, Rink RC, Mouriquand P, editors. Pediatric Urology. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010. p. 473 |
|4.||Wuerstle M, Lesser T, Hurwitz R, Applebaum H, Lee SL. Persistent müllerian duct syndrome and transverse testicular ectopia: Embryology, presentation, and management. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:2116-9. |
|5.||Pavão JM, Gonzaga RA, Cardoso JA, Ferreira A. Transverse testicular ectopia corrected by a modified Ombrédanne operation. J Urol 1984;132:1194. |
|This article has been cited by|
||Case Report of a Man With Sertoli Cell Only, Transverse Testicular Ectopia, and External Auditory Canal Atresia
| ||Enver Özdemir,Hüseyin Koçan,Mehmet Yazici,Erçin Altiok,Fuat E. Su,Mehmet N. Günes |
| ||Urology Case Reports. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Transverse testicular ectopia associated with hemiscrotal hemangioma
| ||Tune-Yie Shih |
| ||Formosan Journal of Surgery. 2014; |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|