Indian Journal of Urology
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 36  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 81--88

Buccal mucosa or penile skin for substitution urethroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Gopal Sharma1, Sneha Sharma2, Kalpesh Parmar1 
1 Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
2 Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery, VMMC and SJH, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Kalpesh Parmar
Department of Urology, PGIMER, Chandigarh
India

Penile skin (PSG) and the buccal mucosa (BMGs) are the most commonly used grafts for substitution urethroplasty. The aim of this study was to compare the success rates of substitution urethroplasty using either of these grafts. We systematically searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and Web of science to identify studies comparing the two types of graft urethroplasties. Search strategy was based on Patient, Intervention, Control and Outcome guidelines. Studies reporting data on success of PSG versus BMG within the same manuscript were included. Standard Preferred reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Metaanalysis guidelines were followed while conducting this review and study protocol was registered with PROSPERO in priori (CRD42018114258). Sixteen studies, including 5 prospective and 11 retrospective studies, with a total of 1406 (896 BMG and 510 PSG) patients were included in the final analysis. In the overall analysis, BMG had significantly higher success rate (83.7% vs. 76.1%, P ≤ 0.0001). Duration of followup was heterogeneous across the studies, ranging from 15.9 to 201 months. Comparing the five studies where the data on duration of follow up was available, BMG showed a significantly higher success rate compared to PSG (90% vs. 80.4%; P = 0.02). In the subgroup of patients with bulbar urethral strictures, BMG urethroplasty had significantly higher success rate (87.4% vs. 78.0%; P = 0.0001). From the results of this study, buccal mucosa may appear to be a better choice, however, the data is still immature and a properly conducted randomized controlled trial with an adequate duration of followup is required.


How to cite this article:
Sharma G, Sharma S, Parmar K. Buccal mucosa or penile skin for substitution urethroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian J Urol 2020;36:81-88


How to cite this URL:
Sharma G, Sharma S, Parmar K. Buccal mucosa or penile skin for substitution urethroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 3 ];36:81-88
Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2020;volume=36;issue=2;spage=81;epage=88;aulast=Sharma;type=0