Indian Journal of Urology
CASE REPORT
Year
: 2014  |  Volume : 30  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 228--229

Appendicocalicostomy: A case of mistaken identity


S Sharma, K Shah, BS Santhosh, SJ Rizvi 
 Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Smt. Gulabben Rasiklal Doshi and Smt. Kamlaben Mafatlal Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre?Dr. H. L. Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Correspondence Address:
S Sharma
Urology, Smt. Gulabben Rasiklal Doshi and Smt. Kamlaben Mafatlal Mehta Institute of Kidney Diseases and Research Centre?Dr. H. L. Trivedi Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Civil Hospital Campus, Asarwa, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
India

Abstract

Anatomical structures with similar appearance may at times be confused for each other. This situation can be compounded by lack of normal anatomical planes. We did ureterocalicostomy on a 32-year-female with secondary pelvi-ureteral junction obstruction. Post-operatively, it was discovered that she had a long appendix running parallel to ureter in retroperitoneum, which was misidentified as ureter and anastomosed to the lower pole of the kidney. She was re-explored, appendix was removed, ureter was identified and ureterocalicostomy was done. Patient is asymptomatic at 1 year follow-up.



How to cite this article:
Sharma S, Shah K, Santhosh B S, Rizvi S J. Appendicocalicostomy: A case of mistaken identity.Indian J Urol 2014;30:228-229


How to cite this URL:
Sharma S, Shah K, Santhosh B S, Rizvi S J. Appendicocalicostomy: A case of mistaken identity. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 5 ];30:228-229
Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2014/30/2/228/126915


Full Text

 Introduction



Appendix lies in close proximity to the distal portion of upper ureter. There are multiple variations in the location and length of the appendix. It may rarely lie parallel to the upper ureter when it can be confused with the latter. We encountered one such case of long appendix running parallel to the ureter in retroperitoneum. It was mistaken for ureter and anastomosed to the lower calyx of kidney

 Case Report



A 32-year-old female patient presented with right flank pain of 3 weeks duration. She had undergone right open pyelolithotomy 6 weeks ago at the private hospital. Intraoperatively, a double J (DJ) stent was placed, which was removed 3 weeks later. Following stent removal she had progressively increasing flank pain. Examination showed a well healed scar of pyelolithotomy and tenderness in the right flank. Her hematological and biochemical investigations were normal. Ultrasonography showed normal left kidney with hydronephrotic right kidney (parenchymal thickness of 7 mm) and 400 ml perinephric collection. A perinephric drain and right percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tubes were placed. A total volume of 300 ml of turbid perinephric fluid was drained stat. PCN output was ≈ 1.5 L/day. Drain was removed after 7 days. A right nephrostogram with the right retrograde ureteropyelogram (RGP) was done, which showed complete cut-off at the pelvi-ureteric junction with small intrarenal pelvis and ureter showed complete cut-off at L2 vertebral level [Figure 1]a and b]. Length of defect was ≈ 3 cm. After 1 month, right ureterocalicostomy was done. Intraoperatively, there were dense perinephric adhesions. Lower pole of the kidney could be mobilized only in the subcapsular plane and the PCN came out during the mobilization. Ureter was dissected inferomedial to the lower pole of the kidney. Lower polar parenchyma was amputated and ureter was spatulated. Ureterocalicostomy was done over DJ stent. Stent could be placed easily. However, urinary bladder was not distended prior to stent placement; hence, no attempt was made to see retrograde efflux of urine from side holes of cranial end of the stent. Post-operative X-ray showed a malpositioned lower end of stent [Figure 1]c]. Right RGP showed stent lying outside the ureter [Figure 1]d. PCN was placed and nephrostogram was done, which showed that the contrast going into the cecum thereby establishing that the lower pole of the kidney was inadvertently anastomosed to tip of the appendix. Patient was re-explored. Ureter was identified medial to the appendix [Figure 2]a. Ureterocalicostomy and appendicectomy was done [Figure 2]b. Post-operatively patient made smooth recovery. PCN and DJ stent were removed after 1 week and 6 weeks respectively. Intravenous urography done 6 weeks following stent removal showed patent ureterocalyceal anastomosis with prompt drainage of contrast. Patient is asymptomatic at 1 year follow-up.{Figure 1}{Figure 2}

 Discussion



Appendix is the bκte noir of medicine. However, in urological practice it is a useful substitute for the right as well as left ureter and for creating catheterizable stomas. [1]

The position of the appendix is highly variable. Retrocecal position is most common seen in 69.2% of cases. [2] Monks and Blake examined 656 cadavers regarding variations in anatomy of appendix. In 4.4% cases, the appendix tracked cranially and to right of caecum. Sometimes, it tracked upward behind caecum, passed over the anterior surface of the right kidney until its upper margin. Another variation was to find the appendix behind the peritoneum, under the caecum and extending to the lower border of the right kidney. The length varied from 1 cm to 25 cm. In 50% cases, the mesoappendix was attached to half-length of appendix at the base, tip remaining free. In certain cases mesoappendix was absent. [3] If a long appendix is positioned adjacent to ureter and the tip is free, it can be easily misidentified as ureter.

In the index case, patient was previously operated and had developed perinephric collection in the post-operative period due to which there were dense perinephric adhesions with obliteration of normal anatomical planes rendering identification of ureter difficult. Intraoperatively, lower end of the DJ stent went into the appendix without any resistance and coiled into the caecum. Because of the ease of placement of stent no misadventure was suspected. However, bladder was not distended prior to stent placement and hence no attempt was made to see efflux of urine from the side holes of cranial end of the stent after positioning it.

In retrospect, this complication could have been avoided by pre-placement of ureteric catheter to aid intraoperative identification of ureter. Giving attention to finer details like partially distending the bladder prior to placement of the stent and to observe retrograde flow of urine from cranial end of stent might also have thwarted this misadventure.

 Conclusion



The position of the appendix is highly variable and it may lie adjacent to the right ureter where it can be confused with the latter. In urological surgeries, when dense fibrosis is expected, pre-placement of ureteral catheter may aid its intraoperative identification. Though ease of placement usually suggests correct positioning of stent, it should always be confirmed by observing retrograde flow of urine from the bladder through side holes of the stent.

References

1Zargar M, Mirzazadeh M, Zargar K. The appendix, an acceptable substitute for all segments of both ureters: A report of two cases. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2004;18:177-80.
2Gladstone RJ, Wakeley CPG. The relative frequency of the various positions of the vermiform appendix: As ascertained by an analysis of 3000 cases: With an account of its development. Br J Surg 1924;11:503-20.
3Monks GH, Blake JB. The normal appendix: its length, its mesentery, and its position or direction, as observed in six hundred and fifty-six autopsies. Boston Med Surg J 1902;197:581-3.