Indian Journal of Urology
SYMPOSIUM
Year
: 2013  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 208--213

The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy?


Bannakij Lojanapiwat 
 Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chiangmai University, Thailand

Correspondence Address:
Bannakij Lojanapiwat
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiangmai University
Thailand

Percutaneous renal access is a common procedure in urologic practice. The main indications are drainage of an obstructed and hydronephrotic kidney and antegrade renal access prior to percutaneous renal surgeries such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and percutaneous endopyelotomy (EP). The contraindications for this technique are patients with history of allergy to topical or local anesthesia and patients with coagulopathy. The creation of a percutaneous tract into the renal collecting system is one of the important steps for percutaneous renal access. This step usually requires imaging. The advantages and disadvantages of each modality of image guidance are controversial. We performed a structured review using the terms: Percutaneous nephrostomy, guidance, fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The outcomes are discussed.


How to cite this article:
Lojanapiwat B. The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy?.Indian J Urol 2013;29:208-213


How to cite this URL:
Lojanapiwat B. The ideal puncture approach for PCNL: Fluoroscopy, ultrasound or endoscopy?. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 4 ];29:208-213
Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2013;volume=29;issue=3;spage=208;epage=213;aulast=Lojanapiwat;type=0