Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1728  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Singh Pratipal, Kapoor Rakesh, Suri Amit, Singh Kamal Jeet, Mandhani Anil, Dubey Deepak, Srivastava Aneesh, Kumar Anant

Year : 2007| Volume: 23| Issue : 1 | Page no: 9-12

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Functional evaluation before stone surgery: Is it mandatory
Nayyar, R. and Khattar, N. and Sood, R.
Indian Journal of Urology. 2012; 28(3): 256-262
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
2 Laparoscopic pyeloplasty | [Laparoskopická pyeloplastika]
Schmidt, M., Hanek, P., Veselý, S., Jarolím, L.
Endoskopie. 2010; 19(1): 34-36
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
3 Minimal invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in low volume pelvis: A comparative study of endopyelotomy and laparoscopic nondismembered pyeloplasty
Singh, P., Jain, P., Dharaskar, A., Mandhani, A., Dubey, D., Kapoor, R., Kumar, A., Srivastava, A.
Indian Journal of Urology. 2009; 25(1): 68-71
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
4 Letter to the editor
Kapoor, R., Singh, P.
Indian Journal of Urology. 2007; 23(3): 330
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]
5 Poorly functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction block [1]
Sarin, Y.K.
Indian Journal of Urology. 2007; 23(3): 330
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar]

 

Read this article
HEALTHWARE INDIA