Indian Journal of Urology Users online:298  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
URORADIOLOGY
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 263-264
 

A giant ureteric calculus


Department of Urology, Kamineni Hospitals, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Date of Web Publication29-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Rajiv Rathod
Department of Urology, Kamineni Hospitals, L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 068
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.117274

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Ureteric stones are usually small and symptomatic. We present a case of a 35-year old female who presented with minimally symptomatic right distal ureteric calculus with proximal hydroureteronephrosis. Laparoscopic right ureterolithotomy was performed and a giant ureteric calculus measuring 11 cm Χ 1.5 cm, weighing 40 g was retrieved.


Keywords: Giant, ureterolithotomy, ureterotomy


How to cite this article:
Rathod R, Bansal P, Gutta S. A giant ureteric calculus. Indian J Urol 2013;29:263-4

How to cite this URL:
Rathod R, Bansal P, Gutta S. A giant ureteric calculus. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 May 22];29:263-4. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2013/29/3/263/117274



   Introduction Top


Ureteral stones are usually small in size and, depending on their size, may pass spontaneously. However, stones larger than 1 cm in diameter and more than 0.1 g are less likely to pass spontaneously. An impacted calculus may continue to increase in its longitudinal diameter rather than the transverse diameter after some time and becomes oblong shaped. We report a case of a large ureteric calculus of 11 cm in length and 40 g in weight, which was removed laparoscopically.


   Case Report Top


A 35-year-old lady presented with complaints of episodic pain in the right lumbar region for 1 year. Previously she was treated and the symptom subsided. On evaluation found to have large calculus in the right lower ureter causing severe proximal Hydroureteronephrosis and her physical examination was unremarkable. An X-ray of the kidney-ureter-bladder region showed a long slender calculus in the right lower ureter [Figure 1]. Her renal function was normal. Intravenous urography revealed good excretion of contrast from the left kidney, but no excretion was observed on the right side. Tc99 DTPA renal scan revealed right kidney has less function as compared to the left kidney.
Figure 1: Intravenous urography shows non-excreting right kidney with the normal left side and the right lower ureteric calculus

Click here to view


She underwent laparoscopic right ureterolithotomy with removal of a giant ureteric calculus, 11 cm in longitudinal and 1.5 cm in transverse length [Figure 2]. The stone weighed 40 g. Post-operatively she recovered well and discharged and she remained well in follow-up.
Figure 2: Large ureteral calculus approx. 11 cm length

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Ureteric stones which exceed 5 cm in size are termed giant ureteric calculi and are rare. [1],[2] The largest calculus so far reported was by Mayer, which measured 11 cm × 5.5 cm × 5 cm and weighted 286 g while the longest stone reported was by Taylor, [3] which was 21.5 cm in length. In India, the largest ureteric stone reported is 13 cm long and weighed 90 g. [4] Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy allows a minimally invasive approach to managing these cases.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopic removal and open surgery are the commonly employed modalities of treatment. Recently, laparosopic ureterolithotomy, which is minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, has been described for the treatment of large ureteral stones. [5]

The need for the open surgery for treatment of urinary stones is 2.7%. The main advantages are decreased post-operative pain, shorter hospital stay and quicker convalescence in comparison to open surgery.

It is not essential to reach the distal end of the stone during dissection. A small ureterotomy incision can be placed at the proximal end of the stone, followed by simple manipulation can retrieve the entire stone [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Intraoperative laparoscopic view showing incised right lower ureter with impacted calculus

Click here to view


 
   References Top

1.Hemal AK, Goel A, Goel R. Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol 2003;169:480-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Lee WC, Hsieh HH. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for impacted ureteral stones. Chang Gung Med J 2000;23:28-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Taylor WN. Large ureteric calculi; Report of case. J Urol 1934;32:93-102.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Sabnis RB, Desai RM, Bradoo AM, Punekar SV, Bapat SD. Giant ureteral stone. J Urol 1992;148:861-2.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Demirci D, Gulmez I, Ekmekcioglu O, Karcagil M. Retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy for the treatment of ureteral calculi. Urol Int 2004;73:234-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (621 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1543    
    Printed25    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded104    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA