Indian Journal of Urology Users online:2228  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 166-172
 

Pleated colposuspension: Our modification of Burch colposuspension


Department of Urogynaecology and Pelvic Floor Disorders, University Clinic for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty, Saint Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia, Europe

Date of Web Publication29-Aug-2013

Correspondence Address:
Vesna S Antovska
ul. K.Krstevski Platnik, 4 l000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
Europe
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.117265

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Introduction: Burch colposuspension is a standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence. However, it is associated with recurrence and urinary retention. We describe a modification of this technique to overcome these problems and evaluate the results in comparison with the standard procedure.
Materials and Methods: A total of 145 patients with isolated stress urinary incontinence (SUI), underwent either our modified pleated colposuspension (PC); n = 97) or standard Burch colposuspension (BC) (n = 48). Description of PC: Three No. 0 non-absorbable sutures were placed in the side-to-side manner at the mid-urethral level with 0.5-1.0 cm distance between them using double bites and were passed through the Cooper's ligament. The patients were followed-up every 6 months for SUI and genital prolapse evaluation. Successful surgery was defined as (1) No self-reported SUI symptoms, (2) Negative Marshall's coughing test (MT), (3) No retreatment for SUI, (4) Absence of urodynamic SUI. In addition, failure was defined as the occurrence of urinary retention, use of catheter on 6-week visit, maximum flow rate <15 ml/s, flow time >60 s, or residual urine >100 ml. Data was compared using Student's paired test and Mantel-Haenzel's χ2 test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The mean follow-up after surgery for PC was 102.4 months and for BC was 103.6 months. At last follow-up, data suggesting failure (Stress score ≥7, urge score ≥7, Pad test with weight > 15 g/day and positive MT during lithotomic/upright position) were more frequent in BC group (P < 0.05; P < 0.0; P < 0.01; P < 0.05; P < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of recurrent SUI was 5.2% after PC and almost triple (14.6%) after BC. Residual urine >100 ml and weak stream were more frequent in the BC group (P < 0.05; P < 0.01, respectively). Detrusor over-activity on urodynamic studies, Flow time >60 s, urethral pressure profilometry positive for obstruction had a higher incidence in BC group (P < 0.01; P < 0.001; P < 0.01, respectively).
Conclusion: Our modified pleated colposuspension showed improved outcomes when compared with standard Burch colposuspension.


Keywords: Colposuspension, genital prolapse, urinary stress incontinence


How to cite this article:
Antovska VS. Pleated colposuspension: Our modification of Burch colposuspension. Indian J Urol 2013;29:166-72

How to cite this URL:
Antovska VS. Pleated colposuspension: Our modification of Burch colposuspension. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 May 20];29:166-72. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2013/29/3/166/117265



   Introduction Top


Surgical options for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) include procedures such as the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure, Burch colposuspension (BC) and pubovaginal sling procedures. [1] All these procedures achieve continence through tightening of the pubocervical fascia, elevation of the bladder neck (BN), increase of urethral resistance or functional urethral length. Post-operative urodynamics often show an increase in urethral pressure-transmission. [2] In healthy women, the maximum transmission-ratios are at the mid-urethra but after BC, these move to the proximal half of urethra. [3] We describe a modification of the standard Burch procedure and evaluated functional outcomes of our techniques in comparison with the standard procedure.


   Materials and Methods Top


Between January 2002 and December 2006, women with isolated SUI without coexisting genital prolapse (GP) i.e., stage-0 according to pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ), [4] requiring anti-SUI surgery were enrolled in an institutional ethics committee approved prospective study. Presence of incomplete emptying (residual urine >100 ml) and weak stream, (maximum flow rates <15 ml/s with voided volume >200 ml) were contraindications for surgery.

198 women with isolated SUI were screened for inclusion. Of these, 20 patients were excluded because they refused to participate, 14 patients had contraindications for anti-SUI surgery, and six patients had co-morbidities that prevented surgery. 13 patients did not return for follow-up and data for 145 patients was evaluated. This included 97 in the PC group and 48 in the BC group.

All patients underwent a complete evaluation for urinary incontinence and genital prolapse with (a) Structured questionnaire based on the International Continence Society recommendation; [5] (b) Marshall's coughing test (MT) in upright position (UP), lithotomy position (LP) and during cervix reposition maneuver (CRM) after bladder filling with 300 ml; (c) urodynamic studies including multichannel urethrocystometry, passive/dynamic urethral pressure profilometry (UPP), simple uroflowmetry, residual urine; (d) POPQ during rest position (RP) and Valsalva maneuver (VM) after complete emptying of bladder and rectum. All operations were performed by the author of the article.

Surgical procedure

Description of the original BC [6] [Figure 1], left panel]: Once dissection lateral to the urethra is completed, the surgeon's non-dominant hand is placed in the vagina, palm facing upward, with the index and middle finger on each side of proximal urethra. The position of the urethra is determined by palpating the Foley catheter. The bladder is partially filled in order to define its lower margin. No midline dissection of the urethra is performed; thus, protecting its delicate musculature. Three 'No. 0', non-absorbable sutures are placed as far laterally in the anterior vaginal wall as is technically possible in the vertical manner: Distal sutures 2 cm-lateral to the proximal urethral third; middle one 2 cm-lateral to urethra-vesical junction (UVJ); proximal one 2 cm-lateral to the distal bladder. The sutures are placed bilaterally, using double bites through full vaginal thickness, excluding the epithelium, with the needle parallel to the urethra and finally passed through the pectineal Cooper's ligament. The sutures are tied while the surgeon elevates the vagina with the vaginal hand.
Figure 1: Suture placement and mechanism of action of original Burch colposuspension (left side) and our pleated colposuspension (right side)

Click here to view


Description of our PC [Figure 1], right panel]: The bladder is completely emptied to protect its lower margin from damage during suture placement. Three 'No. 0' non-absorbable sutures (Ethibond; Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) are placed as close laterally in the anterior vaginal wall as is technically possible in horizontal (side-to-side) manner at level of the rich, thin-walled venous plexus, which creates a ring around the mid-urethra (1 cm below the urethro-vesical junction (UVJ)). The inner suture is placed just lateral to the urethral wall, and the other two at the same level, with 0.5-1.0 cm distance. The sutures are placed bilaterally, using double bites, through full vaginal thickness, excluding the epithelium, with the needle parallel to the urethra. This area is extremely vascular; thus, the needle must pass under the plexus. If venous bleeding occurs, the suture is immediately tied using the surgeon's right hand while the assistant lifts the free end of the suture. The sutures are placed through Cooper's ligament and tied lightly above it, without vaginal elevation. Excellent hemostasis, as well as continuous drainage of the space of Retzius helps prevent adhesion formation and aids urethral mobility, which is crucial for good post-operative results.

Post-operative care includes antibiotic prophylaxis and anticoagulation. The Foley-catheter is removed on the second post-operative day.

Post-operative evaluation

Patients were followed-up every 6 months with SUI and GP evaluation. A successful outcome was defined according to the SISTEr trial [7] a priori as: (1) Negative pad test, i.e., an increase of less than 15 g in pad weight during a 24-h period; (2) no incontinence episodes on 3-day diary; (3) negative MT; (4) no self-reported urinary incontinence symptoms according to the Urinary Incontinence Score in the Diagnosis of Female Urinary Incontinence, according to Ishiko [8] (5) no retreatment for SUI; (6) absence of urodynamic stress incontinence.

Because the voiding diary and pad test do not differentiate between urge incontinence and stress incontinence, the definition of success specific to stress incontinence was limited to no self-reported symptoms of SUI, a negative MT, no retreatment for SUI and the absence of urodynamic stress incontinence. The definition of success specific to urge incontinence was limited to the absence of urodynamic detrusor-overactivity incontinence.

Voiding dysfunction was defined by the need for surgical revision to facilitate bladder emptying or the use of any type of catheter after the 6-week visit as well as the presence of urodynamic signs of urine retention, such as: Maximum flow rate <15 ml/s, flow time >60 s and residual urine >100 ml. Patients who answered that they were either completely or mostly satisfied were classified as being satisfied with the outcome.


   Results Top


The two groups were similar in baseline demographic data. There were no differences in operation time, estimated blood loss, and post-operative complications between the groups. There were no serious adverse events such as ureteral injury, urethrovaginal or vesicovaginal fistulae, incidental vaginotomy or cystotomy, erosion of suture into the bladder, or voiding dysfunction leading to surgical revision in either group.

The mean duration of follow-up for PC group was 102.4 months and for BC group was 103.6 months. At last follow-up, two anatomical landmarks of POPQ, [4] which identify the position of the anterior vaginal wall during maximal effort (point Aa, reflecting BN and point Ba, reflecting the upper part of the anterior vaginal wall) were in higher position in the BC group, suggesting greater BN elevation [Table 1].
Table 1: Pre-operative/post-operative bladder neck position in patients with isolated SUI

Click here to view


[Table 2] compared outcomes between the two groups in terms of the Marshall's coughing test in various positions. Higher incidence of positive MT in the lithotomy and upright positions in the BC group at the last follow-up were significant, suggesting poorer outcomes in this group (P < 0.05; P < 0.05, respectively). Questionnaire based functional symptoms and clinical evaluation suggesting poorer outcomes (stress score ≥7 and urge score ≥7) were more frequent in the BC group, (P < 0.05; P < 0.01, respectively) while data in favor of higher cure rate (no incontinence episodes on 3-day diary) was more frequent in PC group (P < 0.05). Urge symptoms such as frequency, urgency, hesitancy, and nocturia were more frequent in BC group (P < 0.01; P < 0.01; P < 0.01; P < 0.05, respectively).
Table 2: Recurrence of SUI with positive MT on the last follow-up in patients with isolated SUI

Click here to view


Clinical signs of recurrent SUI such as the pad test with weight > 15 g/day and positive MT during LP and UP, i.e., genuine SUI were more frequent in BC group (P < 0.01; P < 0.05; P < 0.05, respectively). The incidence of recurrent SUI after PC was 5.2% but it was almost three times higher (14.6%) after BC. On the Q-tip test, resting angle was significantly greater in PC group (P < 0.05) but was still lower than 30 degrees, as a sign of satisfactory urinary continence [Table 3].
Table 3: Post-operative functional symptoms based on the urinary incontinence symptoms score of Ishiko et al.[9] and clinical evaluation

Click here to view


On urodynamic studies, we found a higher incidence of detrusor overactivity, flow time >60 s and positive default transmission on dUPP as a sign of recurrent SUI (P < 0.01; P < 0.001; P < 0.01, respectively) in the BC group. group. Clinical signs of urine retention such as incomplete emptying (residual urine >100 ml) and weak stream were more frequent in BC group (P < 0.05; P < 0.01, respectively) [Table 4].
Table 4: Post-operative urodynamic studies and adverse events

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Riccetto et al., [9] suggested that the principal ligaments of the pelvic floor that interact with the muscles during Valsalva maneuver are: (1) Pubo-urethral ligaments (PUL), which originate from the lower border of pubis, pass downward and insert into the arcus tendineus fascae pelvis (ATFP) on the level of mid-urethra; (2) urethro-pelvic ligaments (UPL), which originate bilaterally from the above mentioned insertion of PUL into ATFP and fuse behind the mid-urethra; (3) utero-sacral ligaments, which originate from the sacrum, pass forward and insert into the vaginal Halban's fascia, making a fascial ring around the uterine cervix. The region between the mid-urethra and urethra-vesical junction, so-called zone of elasticity, plays a crucial role in the urination-continence mechanism. The [Figure 2] represents the position of the above mentioned ligaments when they are intact [Figure 2]a and when they are weakened with the presence of SUI [Figure 2]b. In SUI, their direction is changed, i.e., they are more horizontally positioned. The final result is a descent of mid-urethra.
Figure 2: Position of the pelvic floor ligaments when: (a) they are intact. (b) they are weakened and stress incontinence is present. (1) Urethro-pelvic ligament; (2) Pubo-urethral ligament; (3) Halban's vaginal fascia; (4) Arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis; (5) uterosacral ligament; (6) Pelvic superior fascia; (7) Musculus levator ani

Click here to view


We would like use the analogy of a bow and arrow to describe our hypothesis. The urethro-pelvic ligaments are the back-end of the arrow, the ATFP is the bow-string and the arcus tendineus musculi levatoris ani (ATMLA) with its aponeurosis, pelvic superior fascia (PSF), attached to the obturator fascia (OF), together act as the bow [Figure 3]. During continence, contraction of the UPL stretches the ATFP with a consequent opposite pull by the ATMLA/PSF/OF.

Our new PC tends to imitate this natural mechanism [Figure 4]. Due to the pleating, the UPL gets shortened and straightened. This creates the first vector force, akin to an arrow being pulled on a bow. This force pulls the ATFP in its central part, corresponding to the mid-urethra. This stretch is transmitted to the ATMLA/PSF/OF complex where, as a reaction, it initiates the second vector force from the tissues. The latter anatomic structures are very strong and the final result of these forces is traction, stretching and lifting of UPL causing creation of a strong, non-permanent sub-urethral support. This sub-urethral support is composed of both Cooper's ligaments, three non-absorbable sutures and the central part of UPL. The non-absorbable sutures replace the weakened PUL in cases with SUI. This sub-urethral support is stretched and fixed supero-laterally by the bilateral reaction-vector force of the ATMLA/PSF/OF.
Figure 3: Transversal and horizontal view of the proposed mechanism of action UPL: Urethro-pelvic ligament; PUL: Pubo-urethral ligament; ATFP: Arcus tendineus fasciae pelvis; ATMLA: Arcus tendineus musculi levatoris ani; PSF: Pelvic superior fascia; LAM: Levator ani muscle; OF: Obturator fascia

Click here to view
Figure 4: Mechanism of action of our pleated colposuspension

Click here to view


Our technique also proved very effective in preventing urge incontinence, which can be explained by the integral theory of continence by Petros and Woodman. [10] According to them, urge incontinence is a neurogenic symptom, which can occur even with minimal prolapse. Like a trampoline, the muscle forces stretch the vaginal membrane against the ligaments (springs). A lax membrane, or even one loose ligament, which prevents its tightening, may cause the micturition-stretch receptors to fire prematurely and this is perceptive by the cortex as urgency. Our procedure annuls the laxity of UPL and stretches the ATFP which has the richest supply of micturition-stretch receptors.

This theory also explains the effectiveness of our procedure in preventing urine retention. [10] The pubococcygeal muscles pull backwards to stretch the proximal vagina and open the posterior urethral wall. This fires the micturition reflex, contraction of the bladder and voiding. The muscle requires a firm insertion point to function optimally. If the ligaments are lax, it cannot open the bladder neck, resulting in urinary retention. Our procedure annuls the ligament laxity and prevents urine retention.

The main differences between our technique and the original procedure are: (1) The sutures are placed in side-to side manner, instead of the vertically; (2) they are placed at the mid-urethra level, instead of the bladder neck; (3) the inner suture is placed just lateral to the urethral wall instead of as far laterally as is technically possible; (4) the bladder is completely empty to prevent injury to the bladder instead of being partially filled to aid identification of the lower bladder margin; (5) a wide vaginal dissection in the midline over the urethra and UVJ is performed in order to obtain good access to the mid-urethra and provide its satisfactory mobility, instead of no dissection; thus, protecting the delicate urethral musculature from surgical trauma; (6) the sutures are tied without any elevation of the vagina, and (7) meticulous hemostasis and continuous drainage of the space of Retzius to prevent fibrosis and scarring of periurethral and vaginal tissues over OF ). We believe that satisfactory urethral mobility is crucial for achievement of post-operative continence and avoiding urine retention. According to the Lazarevski's Theory, [11] the non-permanent sub-urethral support should be active only during the maximal effort and for this to occur, the principal requirement is a mobile urethra.

We compared our results with those of other authors. Bai et al. [12] found 8.6% recurrence of SUI after BC on the 1-year follow-up while Brubaker et al. [13] found this to be 32.0% with 32.0% urgency symptoms on 2-years follow-up after BC in a series of 302 patients. Lapitan et al, [14] reported that within the first year after BC, the overall continence rate is 85% to 90%, but after 5 years, it drops to approximately 70%. Hong et al., [15] reported 72% cure rate at the last follow-up after a mean 52 months. We noticed 94.8% cure rate after PC (mean 102.4 mo) and 85.4% after BC (mean 103.6 mo).

Regarding the voiding dysfunction, we found much lower incidence of poor stream and incomplete emptying after PC. Natale et al, [16] noted persistent voiding dysfunction in 5-20% patients after the Marshall-Marcheti-Kranz procedure, 4-22% after BC and 5-7% after needle suspension. Kjψlhede, [17] in his 14-year follow-up study of 190 BC procedures, found 28% recurrence, 17% urge incontinence and 42% mixed incontinence. Moon et al., [18] in their study of 49 BC and 60 Trans-obturator tape combined with abdominal sacro-colpopexy, found 69.7% cure rate, 53.1% urinary retention, 18.4% de novo urgency and 18.4 recurrent SUI in the BC group.

The high recurrence rate after BC could be because only its distal suture results in shortening of UPL while the other two make only a slight side-to-side Halban's fascia plication with no effect on SUI. On the other hand, the great vaginal elevation after BC can result in urethral stenosis and urine retention.


   Conclusion Top


Our modified pleated colposuspension showed improved outcomes when compared with standard Burch colposuspension. This operation tends to imitate the natural mechanism of continence during the maximal effort, when the contraction of the UPL stretches the ATFP with a consequent opposite pull by the ATMLA/PSF/OF complex. Due to the pleating, the UPL gets shortened and straightened, and creates a strong, non-permanent sub-urethral support, which is stretched and fixed supero-laterally by the bilateral reaction-vector force of the ATMLA/PSF/OF complex.

 
   References Top

1.Jeffrey LC. Treatment of SUI. Management of stress urinary incontinence. Rev Urol 2004;6 Suppl 5:S18-25.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Rosenzweig BA, Bhatia NN, Nelson AL. Dynamic urethral pressure profilometry pressure transmission ratio: What do the numbers really mean? Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:586-90.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: The results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983;90:919-33.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1988;114:5-19.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bø K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-7.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Walters DM. Retropubic operations for genuine stress incontinence. In: Walters DM, Karram MM, editors. Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery. 2 nd ed. Inc. St. Luis, Missuri: St. Luis Mosby; 1999. p. 159-69.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2143-55.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Ishiko O, Hirai K, Sumi T, Nishimura S, Ogita S. The urinary incontinence score in the diagnosis of female urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2000;68:131-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Riccetto C, Palma P, Tarazona A. Clinical applications of the comprehensive theory of urinary incontinence. Actas Urol Esp 2005;29:31-40.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.Petros PE, Woodman PJ. The integral theory of continence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:35-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Lazarevski MB. Biomechanics of urinary stress incontinence surgery: Theory of the non-permanently acting suburethral supportive structure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000;11:377-85.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    
12.Bai SW, Kim BJ, Kim SK, Park KH. Comparison of outcomes between Burch colposuspension with and without concomitant abdominal hysterectomy. Yonsei Med J 2004;45:665-70.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco A, Weber AM, Cundiff GW, et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:49-55.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Lapitan MC, Cody JD, Grant A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD002912.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]    
15.Hong JH, Choo MS, Lee KS. Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women. J Korean Med Sci 2009;24:1182-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]    
16.Natale F, La Penna C, Saltari M, Piccione E, Cervigni M. Voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery. Minerva Ginecol 2009;61:167-72.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]    
17.Kjølhede P. Long-term efficacy of Burch colposuspension: A 14-year follow-up study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:767-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Moon YJ, Jeon MJ, Kim SK, Bai SW. Comparison of Burch colposuspension and transobturator tape when combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;112:122-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,241 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2453    
    Printed35    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA