Indian Journal of Urology Users online:3165  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 28  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 439-441
 

Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for an obese patient


1 Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, Japan
2 Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

Date of Web Publication10-Jan-2013

Correspondence Address:
Takashi Kawahara
Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital, 2-19-1, Irie, Kanagawa-ku, Yokohama City, Kanagawa
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.105768

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Obesity is associated with increased surgical morbidity and mortality. We previously reported on the usefulness of ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) and here we report a case of renal calculi successfully treated with UARN during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in an obese patient. A 63-year-old female with left renal calculi was referred to Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital. Her body mass index was 34.0 kg/m 2 . Stone fragments were completely extracted. URS-assisted puncture from the renal collecting system to the skin under fluoroscopic guidance was a safe and easy procedure in our obese patient.


Keywords: Lawson catheter, obese, obesity, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, retrograde nephrostomy, ureteroscopy


How to cite this article:
Kawahara T, Matsuzaki J, Kubota Y. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for an obese patient. Indian J Urol 2012;28:439-41

How to cite this URL:
Kawahara T, Matsuzaki J, Kubota Y. Ureteroscopy-assisted retrograde nephrostomy for an obese patient. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2012 [cited 2019 Nov 21];28:439-41. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2012/28/4/439/105768



   Introduction Top


Although disadvantages of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in obese patients have not been reported, in general, obesity has been associated with increased surgical morbidity and mortality. [1] PCNL is usually performed with the patients in prone position, [1] but in morbidly obese patients, this can exacerbate respiratory compromise and impede venous return. To avoid these problems, PCNL in the supine position was tried and it is now well established. We previously reported on the usefulness of ureteroscopy (URS)-assisted retrograde nephrostomy (UARN) in the Galdakao-modified Valdivia position, a position which allows simultaneous percutaneous and retrograde access. [2]

We herein report a case of a renal calculus successfully treated with UARN during PCNL in an obese patient.


   Case Report Top


Case

A 63-year-old female with a left renal calculus was referred to our hospital. Radiography revealed a renal calculus (23 × 16 mm), as shown in [Figure 1]a and 1b. She had no remarkable previous or family history including obesity (158 cm, 85 kg). Her body mass index was 34.0 kg/m 2 and laboratory data showed no remarkable findings. In February 2011, she was admitted to Department of Urology, Ohguchi Higashi General Hospital for PCNL to treat the left renal calculus.
Figure 1: (a) Preoperative KUB film and (b) non-contrast axial CT

Click here to view


Procedure

Under general and epidural anesthesia, the patient was placed in a Galdakao-modified Valdivia position. [2] A flexible ureteroscopy (Flex-X2, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was inserted through an 12 Fr (inner diameter) ureteral access sheath (FlexorÒ, 12 Fr, 35 cm, COOK Urological, IN, USA) inserted into the ureter. We carefully observed the target calculus and defined the appropriate position to puncture. A Lawson retrograde nephrostomy puncture wire (Cook Urological) was then set into the flexible URS. The scope was advanced to the desired calyx again and the puncture wire was driven along the route from the middle calyx to the exit skin. To avoid injury to the spleen, intestines, liver, and pleural cavity, the puncture was performed under ultrasonography. The puncture wire passed through the muscle easily and "tented" the skin at the posterior axillary line under fluoroscopic guidance. The skin was incised and the needle was delivered. Next, the dilator was placed over the puncture wire and advanced through the skin, subcutaneous fat, abdominal wall musculature, and perinephric fat until it reached the renal parenchyma under the URS. A 30 Fr percutaneous nephro access sheath (X-ForceÒ, Nephrostomy Balloon Dilation Catheter, BARD, NJ, USA) was passed over the balloon under continuous visualization with the URS. After inserting the nephro access sheath into the renal collecting system, calculus fragmentation was undertaken using the Swiss Litho ClastÒ lithotripter (EMS, Nyon, Switzerland) through a rigid nephroscope (percutaneous nephroscope, KarlStortz). The operation time was 171 minutes and no major or minor complications were noted. A postoperative kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) film is shown in [Figure 1]b. Stone analysis revealed calcium phosphate and calcium oxalate.


   Discussion Top


Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is often precluded in obese patients due to weight limitations on the table, inability to target the stone due to inadequate fluoroscopic or ultrasonographic imaging, and a skin-to-stone distance exceeding the distance between the point of shock wave generation and the shock wave focal point. [3] Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for obese patients has been reported to result in stone-free rates of around 70-100%. [4] However, because of the length of time required to fragment and remove larger stones, it has been suggested that patients with a greater stone burden would be better treated with PCNL. Indeed, PCNL is preferable for large renal calculi (>2 cm) in obese patients. [5] As increased surgical morbidity and mortality is associated with obesity in general, [5] PCNL is performed in the supine position for morbidly obese patients to minimize risks.

The most critical point in PCNL placement remains puncture site selection, to minimize the risk of hemorrhage as the most probable major complication. US-guided puncture of the collecting system with subsequent placement of the drainage tube under fluoroscopic guidance is the standard modality for PCNL, but US-guided PCNL is difficult in obese patients because of the long distance from the skin to the collecting system. We previously reported the success of UARN in the Galdakao-modified Valdivia position, and here decided to apply it in an obese patient. In 1987, Valdivia-Uria described PCNL with the patient in the supine position, with a 3 L saline bag below the flank, which affords both surgical and anesthesiological advantages. Thereafter, Ibarluzea et al. reported a Galdakao-modified Valdivia position in 2001 that affords simultaneous percutaneous and retrograde access. The Lawson technique has failed to gain widespread acceptance due to difficulties to create long tracts especially in obese individuals under fluoroscopic guidance. The reason of this difficulty comes from the difficulty of making fine adjustment under fluoroscopic guidance for the obese patients whose skin to stone distance is quite long.. Against this background, we decided to use the UARN technique as it affords continuous visualization with the URS and fluoroscopy, and thus contributes to the adequacy of the puncture and the ease of changing direction without extracting the puncture wire. In the present case, nephrostomy was achieved easily and in an ideal position, without the need for a position change from the lithotomy position to prone and vice versa.


   Conclusions Top


URS-assisted puncture from the renal collecting system to the skin under fluoroscopic guidance was a safe and easy procedure in an obese patient. UARN may be effective for PCNL in obese patients.

 
   References Top

1.El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, Eraky I, El-Kenawy MR, et al. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Effect of body mass index. Eur Urol 2007;52:199-204.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H, Yoshida M, Ogawa T, Uemura H, et al. Ureteroscopy assisted retrograde nephrostomy: A new technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10795.x  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Thomas R, Cass AS. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 1993;150:30-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Andreoni C, Afane J, Olweny E, Clayman RV. Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: First-line therapy for proximal ureteral and renal calculi in the morbidly obese and superobese patient. J Endourol 2001;15:493-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.Kang DE, Maloney MM, Haleblian GE, Springhart WP, Honeycutt EF, Eisenstein EL, et al. Effect of medical management on recurrent stone formation following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 2007;177:1785-8; discussion 1788-9.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Re: Collecting System Percutaneous Access Using Real-Time Tracking Sensors: First Pig Model InVivo Experience
Johannes Huber,Ingmar Wegner,Yogesh Garg,Vishwajeet Singh,Satya Narayan Sankhwar
The Journal of Urology. 2014; 191(5): 1476
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (530 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1635    
    Printed50    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded41    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA