Indian Journal of Urology Users online:629  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 577-579
 

Massive retropubic hematoma after minimal invasive mid-urethral sling procedure in a patient with a corona mortis


1 Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Urology, Innsbruck, Austria
2 Medical University Innsbruck, Department of Radiology, Innsbruck, Austria

Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2010

Correspondence Address:
Peter Rehder
Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck
Austria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.74467

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

New and minimal invasive single incision mid-urethral sling procedures are available for treating female stress urinary incontinence. We present a case of a massive retropubic hematoma in a patient with a "corona mortis" artery following a minimal invasive sling procedure. The patient was managed conservatively. The hematoma resolved and the patient remained continent after surgery. Nature and symptoms of sling-related complications should prompt the diagnosis and appropriate postoperative management. One should always be conscious of possible vascular anomalies that might lead to unexpected complications.


Keywords: Arterial anomaly, corona mortis, hematoma, mid-urethral sling, minimal invasive, sling procedure


How to cite this article:
Rehder P, Glodny B, Pichler R, Mitterberger MJ. Massive retropubic hematoma after minimal invasive mid-urethral sling procedure in a patient with a corona mortis. Indian J Urol 2010;26:577-9

How to cite this URL:
Rehder P, Glodny B, Pichler R, Mitterberger MJ. Massive retropubic hematoma after minimal invasive mid-urethral sling procedure in a patient with a corona mortis. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Sep 15];26:577-9. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2010/26/4/577/74467



   Introduction Top


Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is among the top ten medical problems of adult women. Although mid-urethral slings (MUS) as the primary surgical choice for SUI in women are rapidly increasing, they may have significant associated operative complications. [1] New and minimal invasive single incision MUS procedures have been introduced to further reduce the complications such as bladder perforation, injury to structures in the true pelvis, and postoperative pain in the region of the adductor muscles. [2] Current available papers report about continence rates of 91% at the 12-month follow-up and de novo urgency of 37% as the major complication of the procedure. [3] However, other infrequent complications may occur. We report about a case of a massive pelvic hematoma following the single incision MUS procedure for the treatment of SUI in a patient with a prominently developed aberrant obturator artery, a so-called corona mortis artery.


   Case Presentation Top


A 46-year-old woman presented with a 3-year history of progressive SUI requiring one to three pads per day depending on activity. Further medical and surgical histories were unremarkable. In the clinical examination, a mild urethral hypermobility without significant pelvic organ prolapse was noted. Video urodynamic tests were normal (a stable detrusor, normal bladder capacity, normal urinary flow, and voiding studies). The patient underwent a single incision minimal invasive MUS procedure under local anesthesia. Intraoperatively, there were no complications. The day after the procedure, the patient developed infraumbilical pain and lower abdominal swelling. A cystogram was performed, showing a high-rising bladder without evidence of extravasation [Figure 1]. Thereafter, a computed tomography (CT) scan of the pelvis showed a 10Χ10Χ10 cm pelvic hematoma (estimated 1000 ml) in the retropubic space due to an erosion of a particularly prominent anomalic anastomosis between the inferior epigastric artery and the obturator artery of the left side, a so-called corona mortis or crown of death [Figure 2]. The patient had a reduced but then stable hematocrit and was, therefore, managed conservatively with analgesics and bed rest. The patient developed frequency because of a transiently small capacity bladder that resolved spontaneously. Twelve months later, an MRI scan showed that the hematoma had almost completely resolved. The patient remained continent all the time and was happy to have had the operation despite the complication of postoperative hematoma.
Figure 1 :Cystogram showing a high-standing bladder due to the massive retropubic hematoma. Note the large distance of the bladder border to the pelvic rim

Click here to view
Figure 2 :3D volume rendering image of a 46-year-old woman demonstrating a massive retropubic hematoma, the kidneys with ureters, and bladder with an indwelling catheter. Different colors have been applied to mark various structures. The MUS and a strongly developed aberrant obturator artery originating from the inferior epigastric artery on the left side, from which the bleeding occurred, are visible

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


A recent meta-analysis evaluated the complication rates of different surgical treatments for SUI. [1] In summary, the cumulative complications rates were 0.8% for bladder erosion, 1.1% for vaginal erosion, 1.7% for pelvic hematoma, 3.2% for revision operations, 3.4% for bladder perforations, 4% for clean intermittent catheterization, 9.7% for urinary tract infections, 15.6% for storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and 16.1% for voiding LUTS. [1]

The above-mentioned most frequent complications are acceptable and it seems that storage and voiding LUTS predominate. However, major complications have also been reported. Although extremely uncommon, they include bowel, vascular, and nerve injuries. Necrotizing fasciitis, ischiorectal abscess, sepsis, and even patient deaths have been reported. [1] Deng et al . stated in a review that major complications of sling procedures for the treatment of SUI might be underreported in the literature. The surgeon should be aware of the nature and symptoms of sling-related complications for the prompt diagnosis and appropriate postoperative management. Prospective randomized studies and the reporting of complications by all those who perform these operations are the means to minimize future complications and failures. [4]

The single incision minimal invasive MUS procedure has been introduced to lower the risk of complications. [2] Currently limited data are available in the literature regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Only one case of bleeding and one case of bladder perforation have been reported to date, suggesting that complications may be extremely rare. [3] The retropubic hematoma in this case is most likely related to direct injury to an aberrant anastomotic branch between the inferior epigastric artery and obturator artery. Generally, the obturator artery is a branch of the internal iliac artery, and the inferior epigastric artery is a branch of the external iliac artery. Connections between these systems along the obturator fossa have been referred to as a "corona mortis" (= abnormal obturator artery). The corona mortis may consist of venous, arterial, or both types of connections, with wide variability. Several investigators have estimated its arterial incidence as 10-43%. [5] It is located behind the superior pubic ramus at a variable distance from the symphysis pubis (range 30-90 mm). The name "corona mortis" or "crown of death" testifies to the importance of this feature, as significant hemorrhage may occur if accidentally cut. It may be difficult to achieve subsequent hemostasis. [6]

It is clear that knowledge of the pelvic anatomy and obturator space is important to understand and prevent complications. Surgeons who decided to operate in the area of the anterior ring of the pelvis should look for anatomic aberrations to avoid potentially serious bleeding, which may lead to major complications. The key to effective management of complications is early recognition. CT or MRI play a crucial role to establish the diagnosis and plan guided drainage in selected patients. If the patient is hemodynamically stable, a conservative management is recommended, while in the case of expanding hematoma angiography with selective embolization should be preferred, since laparotomy or laparoscopy to these spaces may be challenging. [7]

In the future, better predictable risk factors for complications of MUS placement should be identified. Moreover, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of complications may offer further improvements in the subsequent treatment thereof. [ 8] Minimal invasive procedures might have significant complications, and when carried out in an out-patient setup, patients should be properly informed to seek out appropriate help immediately.

 
   References Top

1.Novara G, Galfano A, Boscolo-Berto R, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Ficarra V, et al. Complication rates of tension-free midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing tension-free midurethral tapes to other surgical procedures and different devices. Eur Urol 2008;53:288-308.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Moore RD, Mitchell GK, Miklos JR. Single-Center Retrospective Study of the Technique, Safety, and 12-Month Efficacy of the MiniArc Single-Incision Sling: A New Minimally Invasive Procedure for Treatment of Female SUI. Surg Technol Int 2009;18:175-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Gauruder-Burmester A, Popken G. The MiniArc sling system in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Braz J Urol 2009;35:334-41; author reply 341-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Deng DY, Rutman M, Raz S, Rodriguez LV. Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported ? Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:46-52.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
5.Karakurt L, Karaca I, Yilmaz E, Burma O, Serin E. Corona mortis: incidence and location. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122:163-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Darmanis S, Lewis A, Mansoor A, Bircher M. Corona mortis: an anatomical study with clinical implications in approaches to the pelvis and acetabulum. Clin Anat 2007;20:433-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]    
7.Rajan S, Kohli N. Retropubic hematoma after transobturator sling procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:1199-202.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials. J Urol 2008;180:1890-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]

This article has been cited by
1 Anatomic relationships of single-incision midurethral slings
Montoya, T.I. and Street, J.J. and Corton, M.M.
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 208(1): 75.e1-75.e5
[Pubmed]
2 Anatomic relationships of single-incision midurethral slings
T. Ignacio Montoya,Jennifer J. Street,Marlene M. Corton
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013; 208(1): 75.e1
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Serious Complications From a Single-Incision Midurethral Sling Placement
Christopher Chung,Taylor Kingman,Lawrence Tsai,Erin Bird
Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012; 119: 464
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Serious complications from a single-incision midurethral sling placement
Chung, C., Kingman, T., Tsai, L., Bird, E.
Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2012; 119(2 Part): 464-466
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (554 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Case Presentation
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3184    
    Printed99    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded36    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 4    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA