Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1072  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents 
SYMPOSIUM
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 516-522
 

Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis


Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Western Ontario, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Center, London, Ontario, Canada

Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2010

Correspondence Address:
Ajay P Sharma
E6-121,WT, Department of Pediatrics, University of Western Ontario, Children's Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre, 800, Commissioners Road East,London, Ontario, N6P1W2
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.74450

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Pediatric urolithiasis has increased globally in the last few decades. There has been a change in the pattern of stone composition with an increase in the frequency of kidney stones and a decrease in bladder stones. The role of familial predisposition and environmental factors in pediatric urolithiasis is now better understood. Metabolic factors are more common in pediatric urolithiasis than in adult stone disease. This review updates on the epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis with a focus on the changing trends in the stone disease, current spectrum of stone disease encountered in clinical practice, individual predisposition and the role of environmental factors in stone formation.


Keywords: Epidemiology, pediatric, prevalence, trends, urolithiasis


How to cite this article:
Sharma AP, Filler G. Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol 2010;26:516-22

How to cite this URL:
Sharma AP, Filler G. Epidemiology of pediatric urolithiasis. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2019 Nov 22];26:516-22. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2010/26/4/516/74450



   Introduction Top


Pediatric urolithiasis is an important kidney disorder encountered in clinical practice. There has been considerable regional variability in the reported incidences of urolithiasis. Also, there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that the overall incidence of pediatric urolithiasis is increasing. A better understanding of different risk factors can help with risk stratification in an individual subject and can guide specific measures to prevent stone recurrence. This review focuses on the current state of knowledge on the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis, temporal trends in stone disease and the status of different risk factors in stone formation. The risk factors for urolithiasis include an individual's susceptibility to form stones, such as genetic predisposition and metabolic abnormalities, and environmental factors that facilitate stone disease, such as dietary practices as well as local climate characteristics.


   Prevalence of Urolithiasis Top


Prevalence of urolithiasis varies in different countries. In adults, the prevalence is relatively higher in Western countries than in the Eastern hemisphere. The reported prevalence of urolithiasis increases from 1-5% in Asia, to 5-9% in Europe, 12% in Canada and 13- 15% in the USA, although even some Asian countries, such as Saudi Arabia, have a very high reported prevalence of 20.1%. [1,2] Children represent 2-3% of the total population of stone-formers. [3] Similar to the regional variability seen in adults, the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis also varies in different parts of the world. In the USA, urolithiasis is said to be responsible for 1 in 7,600 to 1 in 1,000 pediatric hospital admissions. [4] In asymptomatic Turkish primary school children the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis is reported to be 1%. [5] Urolithiasis contributed to 7% of general outpatient consultations in all children's hospitals in Venezuela during 1998. [6] In a hospital-based study from Ethiopia, 13% of admissions were due to urolithiaisis, and close to half of these admissions were in the age group of 0-19 years. [7] The prevalence might be higher than what hospital-based studies suggest, as subjects with asymptomatic stones may be missed. This point was highlighted by a 3.5% prevalence of X-ray-identified calcifications in the upper urinary tract in a cross-sectional study on 3398 randomly selected asymptomatic Scottish adults. [8]

The etiology of regional variability in urolithiasis is multi-factorial and may depend on local conditions and practices. In a nationwide survey from USA on 1,167,009 adults, the odds of stones among participants residing in Southeast USA were nearly double of those living in the Northwest states. [9] The risk of kidney stones in the USA increases from the West to East and from the North to South. [9] The region of the United States with a higher prevalence of kidney stones has been labeled the "stone belt" [also called the "kidney stone belt"]. The term "stone belt" dates back to at least 1976, and it applies to the region in the Southeast USA that includes Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and Kentucky [Figure 1]. Similar regional variation was observed in an Italian study with a higher stone incidence in Southern Italy compared to the North of Italy. [10] The Afro-Asian stone belt stretches from Sudan, the Arab Republic of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Pakistan, India, Myanmar, Thailand, Indonesia to Philippines. Within a stone belt, the incidence of urolithiasis varies within the regions due to the local conditions and practices.
Figure 1 :Stone belt in North America

Click here to view



   Trends in the Prevalence and Pattern of Urolithiasis Top


The epidemiologic studies have shown a progressive increase in the incidence of pediatric urolithiasis over the last few decades, referred to as a "stone wave". An earlier study from 1951 did not find a single case of urolithiasis in 21,835 children at the Babies Hospital in New York. [11] In later studies from the 1960s and 1970s, urolithiasis in children increased steadily. [12],[13],[14] These studies reported the incidence of pediatric urolithiasis in the range of 1 in 6000, 1 in 7600 and 1 in 1850 hospitalized children. [12],[13],[14] This increase in stone incidence has become more pronounced in recent years. VanDervoort et al., reported a fivefold increase in the prevalence of pediatric urolithiasis in North American children in the last decade. [4] Similar trends were also observed in other countries. Annual pediatric referrals for urolithiasis in Turkey showed a fivefold increase in the last decade. [15] It cannot be ruled out that advances in imaging techniques contributed to the reported increase; however, the trend has also paralleled with improved socioeconomic conditions and increased consumption of a protein-rich diet. [16],[17]

Pediatric urolithiasis has also shown a change in the pattern of stone composition and localization. At the beginning of the last century, bladder calculi, composed of ammonium urate were common in Europe; whereas over the past 100 years the pattern has changed to a higher frequency of calculi localized in the upper urinary tract. Moreover, calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate calculi became much more prevalent. [18] This change has been reported from both developed and developing countries. [15],[19],[20] Struvite stones have decreased in frequency and their occurrence has become limited to children with predisposed conditions such as obstructive uropathy and recurrent urinary tract infections. Bladder stones composed of ammonium urate and calcium still remain prevalent in malnourished children [7],[18],[21],[22],[23] and are more commonly reported in developing countries. Nonetheless, the pattern of pediatric urolithiasis in developing countries is now changing, which is similar to trend that was observed in the Western hemisphere over the last century. [18]


   Stone Composition Top


Calcium oxalate is the most common stone worldwide, and accounts for 60-90% of pediatric urolithiasis. [4],[15],[17],[19],[20],[24],[25],[26],[27],[ 28] Sturvite constitutes 1-18% of the stones in developed countries. [15],[29] calcium phosphate accounts for 10-20% stones. [30] Uric acid constitutes 5-10%, cystine 1-5% [1 in 15000 live births] and mixed or miscellaneous 4% of the pediatric stones. [30],[31] Cystine stones have a higher prevalence in endemic areas and in communities with high consanguinity. The reported prevalence of uncommon stone types could be an underestimation in many developing countries due to the unavailability of required diagnostic tools. [32]


   Metabolic Risk Factors Top


Pediatric urolithiasis requires a comprehensive metabolic evaluation to identify underlying risk factors. Metabolic risk factors increase the risk of stone recurrence. [31],[33] The prevalence of metabolic risk factors ranged from less than 20% to greater than 50% in different studies. [15],[17],[33],[34] Hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia are the common metabolic abnormalities, detected in one-third of the stone-formers. [4],[15],[34] The prevalence of hyperuricosuria and hyperoxaluria has been reported to be approximately 20%. [15],[29]

Hypercalciuria

Hypercalciuria is defined as a urinary calcium excretion in excess of 0.1 mmol/kg per 24 h or 4 mg/kg per 24 h. [35] Hypercalciuria can be associated with elevated plasma calcium levels, as in primary hyperparathyroidism, or it can occur with normal serum calcium levels. Hypercalcemia-associated hypercalciuria needs further evaluation of the etiology of hypercalcemia. Normocalcemic hypercalciuria can be an isolated trait, referred to as idiopathic hypercalciuria, or it can have an associated abnormality such as renal tubular acidosis. The term idiopathic hypercalciuria was introduced by Albright and colleagues [36] to describe normocalcemic hypercalciuria without an obvious etiology. The defect in idiopathic hypercalciuria can be impaired renal tubular calcium reabsorption [renal hypercalciuria] or enhanced intestinal calcium absorption [absorptive hypercalciuria]. An overlap of the two mechanisms can also occur, although a differentiation does not change clinical management or prognosis. Calcium balance is negative in almost half the patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria, which can be associated with a reduced bone mineral density. [37],[38] The pathogenesis of decreased bone mineral density in this condition is thought to be secondary to a combination of genetic factors, low calcium intake and altered cytokine production. [39] Idiopathic hypercalciuria is treated with a low-salt and high-fluid diet, potassium citrate supplementation and thiazide diuretics.

Hypocitraturia

Urinary citrate inhibits the crystal precipitation and raises the threshold for stone formation through the formation of chelate complexes with calcium. Hypocitraturia can be idiopathic or can be a manifestation of systemic metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia [40],[41] or inflammatory bowel disease. Hypocitraturia is treated with potassium citrate supplementation.

Hyperoxaluria

Urinary oxalate is mainly derived from endogenous production of ascorbic acid and glyoxylate metabolism. In normal circumstances, only 10-15% of urinary oxalate originates from dietary intake. Food products with high oxalate content include coffee, tea, vegetables such as beans, canned tomatoes, cocoa and chocolate. The proportion of dietary oxalate increases in gastrointestinal conditions associated with fat malabsorption, inflammatory bowel disease or bowel resection. These conditions aggravate oxalate absorption either due to increased gut permeability or by decreased calcium availability for oxalate binding. Oxalate-rich or pyridoxine-deficient foods can also induce enteric hyperoxaluria. Hyperoxaluria due to an inborn error of metabolism is labeled as primary hyperoxaluria [oxalosis]. Two types of hyperoxaluria are differentiated: Type I and Type II. Type I hyperoxaluria is the more common of the two and it occurs in 1 per 120,000 live births. It is transmitted as an autosomal recessive trait. The genetic mutation leads to the defect in enzyme alanine glyoxylate aminotransferase [AGXT]. This enzyme defect leads to an increase in urinary oxalate, glyoxylic acid and glycolic acid. Type II hyperoxaluria is due to a defect in the D-glycerate dehydrogenase enzyme, and it is associated with an increase in urinary oxalate and L-glycerate levels. Low-oxalate, high-fluid and high-calcium diet, trial of pyridoxine supplementation and potassium citrate administration in the presence of low urinary citrate levels forms the cornerstone of therapy. Severe cases can require combined liver-kidney transplantation. It is important to note that a low-calcium diet can cause secondary hyperoxaluria.

Urinary tract infection

Urinary tract infection from urease-producing organisms can predispose to infection stones by splitting urea to ammonia and CO 2 . Ammonia preconditions to the formation of struvite and carbonate apatite stones in the presence of concomitant alkaline urine. [21] The association of pediatric urolithiasis with urinary tract infections is approximately 25%. [32] In pediatric urolithiasis, the prevalence of genitourinary anatomical abnormalities such as ureteropelvic junction obstruction and vesicoureteric reflux can range at 14- 30%. [17],[31]


   Familial and Inherited Predisposition Top


First-degree relatives of stone-formers have a 2-16 times higher risk of developing renal stones when compared with the general population. [42],[43] In a stone-former, the probability of having a relative with stones may be as high as 35-65% as compared with a 5-20% probability in a non-stone-former. [43] It is important to understand that familial recurrence does not necessarily imply an inherited genetic cause. Shared environmental factors and common dietary habits can contribute to familial predisposition. After controlling for dietary pattern, genetic factors have also been recognized to play a significant role in urolithiasis. [44] The mode of inheritance for the genetic factors is largely considered to be polygenic. [45] Monogenic inheritance has been identified for relatively less common etiologies such as cystinuria, primary hyperoxaluria, and for selected etiologies of hypercalciuria such as Dent's disease [the association of low molecular weight proteinuria and hypercalciuria], Bartter syndrome Type V, autosomal dominant hypocalcemic hypercalciuria, familial hypomagnesemia with hypercalciuria and hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis with hypophosphatemia. [46]

Idiopathic hypercalciuria can have a familial predisposition or can occur in a sporadic form. Family history could be positive in up to 65% of patients with hypercalciuric nephrolithiaisis. [47] In familial forms, the pattern of transmission is found to be consistent with autosomal dominant inheritance. [48] Familial pattern has been reported for both absorptive hypercalciuria [48] and renal hypercalciuria. [49] In pedigree analyses, genetic defect was mapped to Chromosome 1q23.3-23.4 [50] for human soluble adenylate cyclase gene; [51] Chromosome 12q12-q14 for vitamin D receptor [VDR] gene; [52] and to Chromosome 9q33.2-q34.2, from which an appropriate candidate gene remains to be identified. [53]

The role of genetic factors in oxalate handling has been the focus of a few studies. Recurrent idiopathic stone-formers have been reported to have a higher prevalence of anomalous erythrocyte transmembrane oxalate flux. In the affected families, the transmission pattern suggested an autosomal monogenetic trait, with complete penetration and a variable expressivity. [54] Hydrochlorothiazide and amiloride have been shown to restore the oxalate flux to normal. [54] The significance of oxalate flux in the clinical management of nephrolithiasis needs further evaluation.


   Ethnicity and Gender Top


Idiopathic stone disease has been reported to be more frequent in white Caucasians than in African-Americans from both adult and pediatric studies. [55] These differences are difficult to explain based simply on ethnicity. Decrease in ethnic disparity in the stone prevalence with the change in dietary pattern in African-Americans suggests a predominant role of environmental factors in the observed discrepancy.

With regard to gender distribution, males were found to be more susceptible for stones in some pediatric studies, [19] an observation not seen in other studies. [31]


   Dietary Habits Top


Epidemiologic studies indicate a major role of diet in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis.

Both malnutrition and obesity increase the risk of urolithiasis. [10] The increase in the stone disease with malnutrition is associated with ammonium-urate stones in the bladder, whereas obesity predisposes to calcium-containing stones localized in the upper urinary tract. In obesity, insulin resistance has been associated with an increase in urinary calcium and decrease in renal tubular acid excretion. [56] Impaired renal tubular acid excretion lowers urinary citrate level and enhances the risk of stone precipitation.

Evidence supports a link between higher dietary animal protein and increase in stone incidence. [57] Protein consumption in children in Europe and North America is three to five times higher than the recommended intake. [58] The increase in dietary protein has been associated with an increase in calcium oxalate stones and higher localization of stones in the kidneys. [10],[16],[17] Diet low in animal protein but high in cereal shifts the spectrum towards a higher predominance of bladder stones composed of ammonium and urate ions, more commonly seen with malnutrition. [19],[22]

The lithogenic potential of dietary protein is believed to be through different mechanisms. It results from a combination of a higher renal load of lithogenic substances, and a tendency towards their increased precipitation in the kidneys. Animal proteins are rich in sulfur-containing amino acids such as cystine and methionine. Oxidation of sulfur to sulfate generates acid load that aggravates calcium mobilization from bones. [59] High purine content in animal protein increases the uric acid burden. Urine oxalate level also increases with high protein intake. [60] High protein load increases glomerular filtration and facilitates a higher delivery of these substances to the urinary tract. Calcium forms soluble complex with sulfate generated from the oxidation of sulfur in proteins. Acid load increases calcium mobilization from the bones, and causes hypercalciuria and low urine citrate levels. [61]

Dietary sodium increases the risk of urolithiasis. Salt intake expands intravascular volume, which can increase urinary calcium level, likely by decreasing renal tubular calcium reabsorption. [62] Increase in salt intake can induce mild systemic metabolic acidosis, which can lower urinary citrate levels, and increases the risk of calcium precipitation in kidneys. [62]

On the contrary, potassium-rich foods lower stone formation through a decrease in urinary calcium excretion. [63] High urinary potassium is believed to increase renal tubular phosphate absorption and consequently inhibit 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin synthesis. [64] Decrease in 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin slows intestinal calcium absorption. Potassium-rich foods offer the additional advantage of high citrate content thus decreasing the precipitation of urinary calcium. [26]

Considering the key role of calcium in the pathogenesis of urolithiasis, the interaction between dietary calcium and the risk of urolithiasis has been controversial. High calcium concentration in calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate stones makes it sound intuitive that high dietary calcium will increase urinary calcium levels and the risk of calcium stones. On the other hand, a low-calcium diet can increase intestinal oxalate absorption and enhance the risk of calcium oxalate stones. This important question was addressed in a prospective study on 45,619 men, aged 40 to 75 years, with no history of kidney stones. [65] The risk of urolithiasis was found to be inversely related to dietary calcium intake. [65] With this evidence, dietary calcium restriction is no longer recommended. The implication of dietary calcium becomes even more significant in children, due to the importance of adequate calcium intake for growth and bone metabolism in the pediatric age group.

A carbohydrate-rich diet has been associated with an increase in urolithiasis in predisposed subjects. Glucose load can induce hypercalciuria, which is ascribed to decreased distal tubular calcium absorption and augmented intestinal calcium uptake. [66] High glucose can also increase the risk of urolithiasis through an increase in urinary oxalate levels. [67]

Climate and season

Parry and Lister were the first to propose that exposure to sunlight might influence stone formation after they observed an increase in urinary calcium among soldiers during summer but not in winter months. [36] In a large voluntary reported survey on 1,185,124 adults aged 30 years or older, ambient temperature and sunlight exposure was positively associated with stone prevalence after adjusting for other relevant variables. [9] Incidence of urinary stones tends to be higher in countries with warm or hot climates. Even within North America, the prevalence of stones becomes higher with an increase in average annual temperature [5.2΀C in North Dakota to 22΀C in Florida] and sunlight index [14.6 in Washington state to 39.7 in Florida]. [9] In a similar observation from Italy, the highest frequency of urolithiasis was found in Southern Italy and the lowest in Northern Italy. [10] Corresponding to high temperatures, stone recurrence becomes higher in summer and fall than in winter and spring. [17] The peak incidence of stone formation occurs in July, August, and September [9],[25],[26],[27],[28],[29],[30],[31],[32],[33] in the Northern hemisphere.

The relationship between urolithiasis and high ambient temperature can be explained by intravascular volume contraction resulting from a combination of dehydration and inadequate fluid intake. Volume contraction increases urine concentration and promotes stone formation. [34],[35] Higher sunlight exposure can also increase the production of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in the skin, leading to an increase in 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D levels which augments intestinal calcium absorption. Elevated levels of circulating 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D have been found in patients with hypercalciuria. [37]


   Local Factors Affecting Stone Formation Top


Local factors have been reported to affect the regional distribution of pediatric urolithiasis.

Intestinal colonization of Oxalobacter formigenes [O. formigenes]

Deficient intestinal colonization of  Oxalobacter formigenes Scientific Name Search . formigenes] in the North Indian population has been associated with a higher frequency of urolithiasis in the local population [68] O. formigenes is a Gram-negative, anaerobic bacterium that metabolizes oxalate in the intestinal tract and has a prevalence of 46-77% in different populations. [69] Deficient intestinal colonization of O. formigenes has been associated with increased risk of absorptive hyperoxaluria and calcium oxalate stones. [68]

The reasons for lower colonization of O. formigenes in certain populations are not well understood. Recent antibiotic administration and local practices of antibiotic use can affect O. formigenes colonization. [70] A study in Ukrainian children provided early insight into the natural history of O. formigenes. [69] O. formigenes was not detected in children younger than one year, had a prevalence of 100% [by polymerase chain reaction ; approximately 80% by culture] between ages six and eight, and dropped to approximately 75% at age 12. [69] Long-term pattern of O. formigenes colonization, loss and reacquisition of the bacterium over the course needs evaluation.

The use of O. formigenes as a probiotic is at an early stage of investigation. A preliminary trial on 16 patients showed a reduction in urinary or plasma oxalate in 11 patients with no adverse effects; however, none of the patients seemed to be permanently colonized during follow-up. [71]

Endemic prevalence of distal renal tubular acidosis

Higher prevalence of renal stones in Northeast Thailand has been attributed to the local endemicity of distal renal tubular acidosis [RTA]. [66] Distal RTA induces systemic metabolic acidosis and increases the risk of urolithiasis by inducing hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia. Even in the absence of overt metabolic acidosis, intermittent and mild acidosis from incomplete distal RTA is capable of causing hypercalciuria and renal calculi. [61],[72] In the presence of metabolic acidosis, hypercalciuria results from calcium mobilization from bones during acid buffering. Renal tubular acidification defects can also lower urinary citrate levels. Low urinary citrate concentration facilitates calcium precipitation in the kidneys. Correction of acidosis offers a therapeutic benefit in both complete and incomplete distal RTA. [73]

Exogenous substances

Melamine contamination in milk has been recently associated with nephrolithiasis in infants. After initial reports of nephrolithiasis among Chinese infants, attributed to milk-based formula surfaced in the summer of 2008, a systematic search by the Chinese Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine [AQSIQ] revealed 22 commercial brands of milk powder with detectable levels of melamine. [74] Melamine [1, 3, 5-triazine-2, 4, 6-triamine, or C 3 H 6 N 6 ], a synthetic chemical developed in the 1830s, is used in a variety of inedible commercial products including cleaning supplies, dry erase boards, and other plastics and has widespread legitimate uses. [29] Melamine can increase non-protein nitrogen content and manufacturers added it to milk to meet quality control tests for protein-based nitrogen content.

The mechanism of melamine nephrotoxicity is not completely understood, although animal studies have provided some insight. Melamine can precipitate in distal renal tubules and forms intratubular green radial crystals which are distinct from calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate crystals. [75] Renal injury is believed to be secondary to an increase in intrarenal pressure resulting from crystal deposition in distal tubule leading to intratubular obstruction and distal tubular necrosis. Melamine stones are composed of melamine and its metabolite cyanuric acid with uric acid, protein and phosphate. [74] These stones are not fully radiopaque.


   Conclusion Top


The incidence of urolithiasis in children has increased globally over the last few decades. The pattern of stone disease has also changed, with an increase in kidney stones secondary to calcium oxalate or calcium phosphate in the kidneys and a decrease in bladder stones composed of ammonium and urate. Evidence favors a significant role of dietary practices in the increase in pediatric urolithiasis. There are marked regional variations in the stone prevalence that has led to the recognition of 'stone belts'. Local climatic conditions play an important role in the stone pathogenesis. Stone occurrence increases in warmer and sunnier regions. The individual risk of stone disease is modified by familial predisposition and genetic susceptibility. Metabolic workup is indicated in all children with a stone disease. Adequate water intake and maintaining a balanced diet are important to reduce the risk of kidney stones. At-risk subjects identified by metabolic workup can benefit by an intervention directed to the specific defect.

 
   References Top

1.Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol 2000;13:S45-50.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Lopez M, Hoppe B. History, epidemiology and regional diversities of urolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:49-59.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Schwarz RD, Dwyer NT. Pediatric kidney stones: Long-term outcomes. Urology 2006;67:812-16.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.VanDervoort K, Wiesen J, Frank R, Vento S, Crosby V, Chandra M, et al. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients: A single center study of incidence, clinical presentation and outcome. J Urol 2007;177:2300-5.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Remzi D, Cakmak F, Erkan I. A study on the urolithiasis incidence in Turkish school-age children. J Urol 1980;123:608.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Orta-Sibu N, Lopez M, Moriyon JC, Chavez JB. Renal diseases in children in Venezuela, South America. Pediatr Nephrol 2002;17:566-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Alemu MH. Pattern of urinary tract stone diseases in Mekelle, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 2008;46:237-41.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Scott R. Prevalence of calcified upper urinary tract stone disease in a random population survey. Report of a combined study of general practitioners and hospital staff. Br J Urol 1987;59:111-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Soucie JM, Coates RJ, McClellan W, Austin H, Thun M. Relation between geographic variability in kidney stones prevalence and risk factors for stones. Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:487-95.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Serio A, Fraioli A. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Nephron 1999;81:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Lattimer JK. Hubbard M. Pediatric urologic admissions. J Urol 1951;66:289-93.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Bass HN, Emanuel B. Nephrolithiasis in childhood. J Urol 1966;95:749-53.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Troup CW, Lawnicki CC, Bourne RB, Hodgson NB. Renal calculus in children. J Urol 1972;107:306-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Malek RS, Kelalis PP. Pediatric nephrolithiasis. J Urol 1975;113:545-51.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Alpay H, Ozen A, Gokce I, Biyikli N. Clinical and metabolic features of urolithiasis and microlithiasis in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:2203-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Yoshida O, Terai A, Ohkawa T, Okada Y. National trend of the incidence of urolithiasis in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Kidney Int 1999;56:1899-904.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Sternberg K, Greenfield SP, Williot P, Wan J. Pediatric stone disease: An evolving experience. J Urol 2005;174:1711-4.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Arch Ital Urol Androl 1996;68:203-49.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.Rizvi SA, Naqvi SA, Hussain Z, Hashmi A, Hussain M, Zafar MN, et al. Pediatric urolithiasis: Developing nation perspectives. J Urol 2002;168:1522-5.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Sarkissian A, Babloyan A, Arikyants N, Hesse A, Blau N, Leumann E. Pediatric urolithiasis in Armenia: A study of 198 patients observed from 1991 to 1999. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:728-32.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Bichler KH, Eipper E, Naber K, Braun V, Zimmermann R, Lahme S. Urinary infection stones. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2002;19:488-98.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Bakane BC, Nagtilak SB, Patil B. Urolithiasis: A tribal scenario. Indian J Pediatr 1999;66:863-5.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Hassan I, Mabogunje OA. Urinary stones in children in Zaria. Ann Trop Paediatr 1993;13:269-71.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Biocic M, Saraga M, Kuzmic AC, Bahtijarevic Z, Budimir D, Todoric J, et al. Pediatric urolithiasis in Croatia. Coll Antropol 2003;27:745-52.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Al-Eisa AA, Al-Hunayyan A, Gupta R. Pediatric urolithiasis in Kuwait. Int Urol Nephrol 2002;33:3-6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.Srivastava T, Alon US. Urolithiasis in adolescent children. Adolesc Med Clin 2005;16:87-109.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Coward RJ, Peters CJ, Duffy PG, Corry D, Kellett MJ, Choong S, et al. Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease in the UK. Arch Dis Child 2003;88:962-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Shah AM, Kalmunkar S, Punekar SV, Billimoria FR, Bapat SD, Deshmukh SS. Spectrum of pediatric urolithiasis in western India. Indian J Pediatr 1991;58:543-9.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Milliner DS, Murphy ME. Urolithiasis in pediatric patients. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:241-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Minevich E. Pediatric urolithiasis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001;48:1571-85.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Kit LC, Filler G, Pike J, Leonard MP. Pediatric urolithiasis: Experience at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Can Urol Assoc J 2008;2:381-6.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Petrarulo M, Vitale C, Facchini P, Marangella M. Biochemical approach to diagnosis and differentiation of primary hyperoxalurias: An update. J Nephrol 1998;11:23-8.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Pietrow PK, Pope JCt, Adams MC, Shyr Y, Brock JW, 3 rd . Clinical outcome of pediatric stone disease. J Urol 2002;167:670-3.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Nicoletta JA, Lande MB. Medical evaluation and treatment of urolithiasis. Pediatr Clin North Am 2006;53:479-91.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. Twenty-four-hour urine chemistries and the risk of kidney stones among women and men. Kidney Int 2001;59:2290-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Albright F, Henneman P, Benedict PH, Forbes AP. Idiopathic hypercalciuria: A preliminary report. Proc R Soc Med 1953;46:1077-81.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Garcia-Nieto V, Ferrandez C, Monge M, de Sequera M, Rodrigo MD. Bone mineral density in pediatric patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Pediatr Nephrol 1997;11:578-83.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Freundlich M, Alonzo E, Bellorin-Font E, Weisinger JR. Reduced bone mass in children with idiopathic hypercalciuria and in their asymptomatic mothers. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17:1396-401.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.Zerwekh JE. Bone disease and hypercalciuria in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:395-401.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.Sharma RK, Sharma AP, Kapoor R, Gupta A. Prognostic significance of distal renal tubular acidosis in posterior urethral valve. Pediatr Nephrol 2001;16:581-5.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.Sharma RK, Sharma AP, Kapoor R, Pandey CM, Gupta A. Prognostic factors for persistent distal renal tubular acidosis after surgery for posterior urethral valve. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;38:488-93.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.Trinchieri A, Mandressi A, Luongo P, Coppi F, Pisani E. Familial aggregation of renal calcium stone disease. J Urol 1988;139:478-81.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.Resnick M, Pridgen DB, Goodman HO. Genetic predisposition to formation of calcium oxalate renal calculi. N Engl J Med 1968;278:1313-38.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.Goldfarb DS, Fischer ME, Keich Y, Goldberg J. A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin [VET] Registry. Kidney Int 2005;67:1053-61.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.Griffin DG. A review of the heritability of idiopathic nephrolithiasis. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:793-6.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.Stechman MJ, Loh NY, Thakker RV. Genetic causes of hypercalciuric nephrolithiasis. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:2321-32.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.Frick KK, Bushinsky DA. Molecular mechanisms of primary hypercalciuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:1082-95.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.Nicolaidou P, Themeli S, Karpathios T, Georgouli H, Athanassaki K, Xaidara A, et al. Family pattern of idiopathic hypercalciuria and its subtypes. J Urol 1996;155:1042-4.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.Harangi F, Mehes K. Family investigations in idiopathic hypercalciuria. Eur J Pediatr 1993;152:64-8.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.Reed BY, Heller HJ, Gitomer WL, Pak CY. Mapping a gene defect in absorptive hypercalciuria to chromosome 1q23.3-q24. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:3907-13.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.Reed BY, Gitomer WL, Heller HJ, Hsu MC, Lemke M, Padalino P, et al. Identification and characterization of a gene with base substitutions associated with the absorptive hypercalciuria phenotype and low spinal bone density. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002;87:1476-85.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.Scott P, Ouimet D, Valiquette L, Guay G, Proulx Y, Trouve ML, et al. Suggestive evidence for a susceptibility gene near the vitamin D receptor locus in idiopathic calcium stone formation. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999;10:1007-13.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.Wolf MT, Zalewski I, Martin FC, Ruf R, Muller D, Hennies HC, et al. Mapping a new suggestive gene locus for autosomal dominant nephrolithiasis to chromosome 9q33.2-q34.2 by total genome search for linkage. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005;20:909-14.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.Baggio B, Gambaro G, Marchini F, Cicerello E, Tenconi R, Clementi M, et al. An inheritable anomaly of red-cell oxalate transport in "primary" calcium nephrolithiasis correctable with diuretics. N Engl J Med 1986;314:599-604.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.Michaels EK, Nakagawa Y, Miura N, Pursell S, Ito H. Racial variation in gender frequency of calcium urolithiasis. J Urol 1994;152:2228-31.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.Abate N, Chandalia M, Cabo-Chan AV, Jr., Moe OW, Sakhaee K. The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: Novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance. Kidney Int 2004;65:386-92.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.Curhan GC. Dietary calcium, dietary protein, and kidney stone formation. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1997;23:261-4.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.Prentice A, Branca F, Decsi T, Michaelsen KF, Fletcher RJ, Guesry P, et al. Energy and nutrient dietary reference values for children in Europe: Methodological approaches and current nutritional recommendations. Br J Nutr 2004;92:S83-146.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.Arnett TR. Extracellular pH regulates bone cell function. J Nutr 2008;138:415S-8.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.Holmes RP, Goodman HO, Hart LJ, Assimos DG. Relationship of protein intake to urinary oxalate and glycolate excretion. Kidney Int 1993;44:366-72.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.Sharma AP, Sharma RK, Kapoor R, Kornecki A, Sural S, Filler G. Incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis affects growth in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2879-85.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.Sakhaee K, Harvey JA, Padalino PK, Whitson P, Pak CY. The potential role of salt abuse on the risk for kidney stone formation. J Urol 1993;150:310-2.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.Osorio AV, Alon US. The relationship between urinary calcium, sodium, and potassium excretion and the role of potassium in treating idiopathic hypercalciuria. Pediatrics 1997;100:675-81.  Back to cited text no. 63
    
64.Jaeger P, Bonjour JP, Karlmark B, Stanton B, Kirk RG, Duplinsky T, et al. Influence of acute potassium loading on renal phosphate transport in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol 1983;245:F601-5.  Back to cited text no. 64
    
65.Curhan GC, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ. A prospective study of dietary calcium and other nutrients and the risk of symptomatic kidney stones. N Engl J Med 1993;328:833-8.  Back to cited text no. 65
    
66.Vasuvattakul S, Nimmannit S, Chaovakul V, Susaengrat W, Shayakul C, Malasit P, et al. The spectrum of endemic renal tubular acidosis in the northeast of Thailand. Nephron 1996;74:541-7.  Back to cited text no. 66
    
67.Schwille PO, Hanisch E, Scholz D. Postprandial hyperoxaluria and intestinal oxalate absorption in idiopathic renal stone disease. J Urol 1984;132:650-5.  Back to cited text no. 67
    
68.Kumar R, Mukherjee M, Bhandari M, Kumar A, Sidhu H, Mittal RD. Role of Oxalobacter formigenes in calcium oxalate stone disease: A study from North India. Eur Urol 2002;41:318-22.  Back to cited text no. 68
    
69.Sidhu H, Enatska L, Ogden S, Williams WN, Allison MJ, Peck AB. Evaluating Children in the Ukraine for Colonization With the Intestinal Bacterium Oxalobacter formigenes, Using a Polymerase Chain Reaction-based Detection System. Mol Diagn 1997;2:89-97.  Back to cited text no. 69
    
70.Duncan SH, Richardson AJ, Kaul P, Holmes RP, Allison MJ, Stewart CS. Oxalobacter formigenes and its potential role in human health. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002;68:3841-7.  Back to cited text no. 70
    
71.Hoppe B, Beck B, Gatter N, von Unruh G, Tischer A, Hesse A, et al. Oxalobacter formigenes: A potential tool for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria type 1. Kidney Int 2006;70:1305-11.  Back to cited text no. 71
    
72.Konnak JW, Kogan BA, Lau K. Renal calculi associated with incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis. J Urol 1982;128:900-2.  Back to cited text no. 72
    
73.Sharma AP, Singh RN, Yang C, Sharma RK, Kapoor R, Filler G. Bicarbonate therapy improves growth in children with incomplete distal renal tubular acidosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:1509-16.  Back to cited text no. 73
    
74.Ingelfinger JR. Melamine and the global implications of food contamination. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2745-8.  Back to cited text no. 74
    
75.Brown CA, Jeong KS, Poppenga RH, Puschner B, Miller DM, Ellis AE, et al. Outbreaks of renal failure associated with melamine and cyanuric acid in dogs and cats in 2004 and 2007. J Vet Diagn Invest 2007;19:525-31.  Back to cited text no. 75
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Metabolische Ursachen sind häufig
Thomas Knoll,Ulrich Humke
pädiatrie: Kinder- und Jugendmedizin hautnah. 2015; 27(1): 34
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Does Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Cause Hearing Impairment in Children?
Murat Tuncer,Cahit Sahin,Ozgur Yazici,Alper Kafkasli,Akif Turk,Banu A. Erdogan,Gokhan Faydaci,Kemal Sarica
The Journal of Urology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Current Role of PCNL in Pediatric Urolithiasis
Ravindra B. Sabnis,Jaspreet S. Chhabra,Arvind P. Ganpule,Sachin Abrol,Mahesh R. Desai
Current Urology Reports. 2014; 15(7)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective in treating single melamine induced urolithiasis in infants and young children
Jia, J. and Shen, X. and Wang, L. and Zhang, T. and Xu, M. and Fang, X. and Xu, G. and Qian, C. and Wu, Y. and Geng, H.
Journal of Urology. 2013; 189(4): 1498-1502
[Pubmed]
5 Galen von Pergamon (129–216/217) und seine Beiträge zur Urologie
F.J. Marx
Der Urologe. 2013; 52(5): 706
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Demographic characteristics and metabolic risk factors in Croatian children with urolithiasis
Danko Miloševic,Danica Batinic,Daniel Turudic,Danko Batinic,Marija Topalovic-Grkovic,Ivan Pavao Gradiški
European Journal of Pediatrics. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones in pediatric patients: A multivariate analysis model for estimating the stone-free probability
Ahmed R El-Nahas,Ahmed M El-Assmy,Bassam A Awad,Samer M Elhalwagy,Ahmed M Elshal,Khaled Z Sheir
International Journal of Urology. 2013; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 High Recurrence Rate At 5 Year Follow-Up In Children Who Underwent Upper Tract Stone Surgery
Michael Lao,Barry A. Kogan,Mark D. White,Paul J. Feustel
The Journal of Urology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy is Effective in Treating Single Melamine Induced Urolithiasis in Infants and Young Children
Jianye Jia,Xiaowei Shen,Liya Wang,Tiejun Zhang,Maosheng Xu,Xiaoliang Fang,Guofeng Xu,Chen Qian,Yeming Wu,Hongquan Geng
The Journal of Urology. 2013; 189(4): 1498
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 High incidence of urinary stones in Uyghur children may be related to local environmental factors
Aikebaier Wumaner,Aziguli Keremu,Dilixiati Wumaier,Qing Wang
Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2013;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Urolithiasis im Kindesalter
T. Knoll,U. Humke
Der Urologe. 2013; 52(8): 1084
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Demographic study of water hardness with potential to predict formation of renal crystals
Chatterjee, D. and Verma, V. and Amiti and Rohil, S. and Vidya, R. and Raj, A.N.
Advanced Materials Research. 2012; 584: 504-508
[Pubmed]
13 Management of impacted urethral stones in children
Akhtar, J. and Ahmed, S. and Zamir, N.
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2012; 22(8): 510-513
[Pubmed]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
 

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (409 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Prevalence of Ur...
    Trends in the Pr...
    Stone Composition
    Metabolic Risk F...
    Familial and Inh...
    Ethnicity and Gender
    Dietary Habits
    Local Factors Af...
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5363    
    Printed213    
    Emailed4    
    PDF Downloaded317    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 13    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA