Indian Journal of Urology Users online:39  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 317
 

The peer reviewers


University College of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication12-Jul-2010

Correspondence Address:
Sourabh Aggarwal
257/6, Central Town, Jalandhar City, Punjab -144 001
India
Login to access the Email id


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.65418

PMID: 20877622

Get Permissions

 

How to cite this article:
Aggarwal S. The peer reviewers. Indian J Urol 2010;26:317

How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal S. The peer reviewers. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2010 [cited 2014 Sep 22];26:317. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2010/26/2/317/65418


Dear Editor,

I read the editorial article 'Peer reviewers - The gate keepers of Science' [1] with due interest. The peer reviewers are indeed the silent backstage workers who help to bring out the refi ned version of the research papers. They are strong pillars who contribute immensely to research papers and good quality scientifi c journals. I sincerely applaud the efforts which went in organizing the workshop for peer reviewers to train them to evaluate manuscripts, besides other things.

Not only do the peer reviewers have to have in depth knowledge of the subject concerned, they should also be trained to identify ethical misconduct in manuscript submission and report the misconduct to the concerned authority at the earliest so that appropriate action is taken. They need to identify various unethical conducts including plagiarism, double publication, fabricated data and falsifying, idea stealing, self plagiarism, copyright infringement. These should be discouraged at all levels and authors promoting it repeatedly should be reported to higher authorities.

The evolution of medical practice stems from the data obtained from the research studies and the scientific journals. Thus, more such workshops should be organized to contribute to good quality of research papers and journals and thus to the evolution of medical practice in a larger perspective.

 
   References Top

1.Kekre NS. Peer reviewers: The gate keepers of science. Indian J Urol 2009;25:425-6.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (571 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed864    
    Printed45    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA