|Year : 2009 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 312-317
Etiopathogenesis of benign prostatic hypeprlasia
Jie Tang, JingChun Yang
Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, P. R, China
|Date of Web Publication||1-Oct-2009|
Department of Ultrasound, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100 853, P. R
| Abstract|| |
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common condition affecting men older than 50 years of age. It affects about 10 percent of men under the age of 40, and increases to about 80 percent by 80 years of age. BPH is a hyperplastic process of the fibromuscular stromal and glandular epithelial elements of the prostate. Aging and the presence of the functional testes are the two established risk factors for the development of BPH. The etiopathogenesis of BPH is still largely unresolved, but multiple partially overlapping and complementary theories have been proposed, all of which seem to be operative at least to some extent. This review is focused on recent progress in this area and on the growing consensus for the important mechanisms underlying the etiology and pathogenesis of BPH.
Keywords: Benign prostatic hyperplasia, etiopathogenesis
|How to cite this article:|
Tang J, Yang J. Etiopathogenesis of benign prostatic hypeprlasia. Indian J Urol 2009;25:312-7
| Introduction|| |
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common condition affecting men older than 50 years of age. It affects about 10 percent of men under the age of 40, and increases to about 80 percent by 80 years of age. BPH is a hyperplastic process of the fibromuscular stromal and glandular epithelial elements of the prostate. Aging and the presence of the functional testes are the two established risk factors for the development of BPH. Although not a life-threatening condition, BPH can significantly affect quality of life. BPH manifests clinically with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and may be associated with sexual dysfunction. 
The etiopathogenesis of BPH is still largely unresolved, but multiple partially overlapping and complementary theories have been proposed, all of which seem to be operative at least to some extent. This review is focused on recent progress in this area and on the growing consensus for the important mechanisms underlying the etiology and pathogenesis of BPH.
| Role of Androgens and Estrogens in BPH Development|| |
The prostate consists of a network of glandular elements embedded in stroma, with androgen being the most important factor for prostatic growth. Androgens elicit their morphogenetic effects by acting through androgen receptors (ARs) in urogenital sinus mesenchyme (UGM), which induces prostatic epithelial development. In adulthood, reciprocal homeostatic stromal-epithelial interactions maintain functional differentiation and growth-quiescence. It is generally held that androgens are not only required for normal function of the prostate gland but also have been implicated in prostate disease as well. 
The breakthrough discovery that DHT is the active factor in the prostate is the rationale for the use of 5a-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of BPH. DHT-mediated effects within the stromal compartment produce growth-stimulatory factors which induce signal transduction within epithelial cells. This interrelationship is important for normal growth regulation. However, it should be noted that human BPH is not associated with elevated DHT levels.  The paradox of continuing prostatic growth with declining androgen levels suggests that other factors secreted by the testis can stimulate prostate growth or perhaps sensitize prostatic cells to the effect of androgen.  Estrogen may act in combination with other hormones to stimulate prostate cells and cause enlargement of the gland. Estrogen-androgen synergisms as well as a role for other steroidal hormones have also been suggested as mechanisms for BPH.
Estrogens play a role in proliferation in the prostate, but interestingly are capable of stimulating as well as inhibiting growth. This duality of action is specifically due to activation of each ER: ERa and ERβ.
Estrogen action, mediated via ERa, will cause aberrant cellular differentiation and proliferation with progression to prostatic hyperplasia, neoplasia, and dysplasia. ,,
Earlier studies , established that the epithelial and stromal elements both contain AR and 5aR and that the estrogen receptor, ERa, is primarily localized in stromal tissue. Consequently, estrogens have long been implicated in stromal cell hyperplasia and the development of the stromal adenoma that results in the bladder outflow obstruction associated with BPH. Estrogens may exercise a synergistic role with DHT in promoting this effect, but could be more concerned in the suppression of apoptosis. Whatever mechanism obtains, the accumulated studies of Krieg et al.  support the concept that the age-related metabolism of androgens and estrogens can be considered responsible for the stromal cell hyperplasia associated with BPH. They have shown that estrogen accumulation in the human prostate is an age-dependent event. Analysis of the concentrations of oestradiol-17b and estrone in both compartments of normal and hyperplastic prostates clearly demonstrated an increase in the levels of both estrogens in the stroma with increasing age. The levels in epithelial tissue remained constant. Interestingly, DHT concentrations in the epithelium decreased with increasing age, whereas the levels in stroma remained constant. The overall picture portrays an enhanced estrogenic influence, relative to that of DHT, in the elderly man. Support studies  show an age-related decrease in DHT levels in the transition zone (TZ) of the human prostate, contemporaneously with a resultant enhanced estrogen/androgen ratio in this region of the prostate. The influence of both androgens and estrogens on the promotion of smooth muscle hyperplasia seems pivotal to these complex epithelialstromal interactions, relating closely to the classical studies of Walsh and Wilson  that highlighted the synergistic role of the hormones in the promotion of prostate growth.
More recently, an antiproliferative action of estrogen was suggested to occur via activation of the epithelial ERβ.,, The aromatase knock-out (ArKO) mouse is estrogen deficient and develops prostatic hyperplasia and hypertrophy,  both of which are suppressed and/or ablated in intact animals following the administration of an ERβ-specific (but not ERa) agonist.
Aromatase, the enzyme required for metabolism of androgens to estrogens, is expressed in the stroma of the normal prostate.  The absence of aromatase activity in both the stroma and epithelium of prostate tissue recombinants results in epithelial hyperplasia comparable to that seen in intact ArKO mice and in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.  The absence of local aromatase expression in the prostate is a key factor in determining epithelial cell hyperplasia. Aromatase deficiency, and therefore the absence of local estrogen and failure to activate ERβ, locally and within the tissue itself, will result in the development of prostatic hyperplasia and is independent of the systemic hormone status. In the absence of ERβ signaling, increased cell proliferation results in non-neoplastic increases in epithelial tissue identified as epithelial hyperplasia.
Although androgens are essential for the coordinated growth of the prostate, local estrogenic activity is equally essential for the modulation of normal prostate development. Estrogen, acting via ERβ, has a definite antiproliferative effect on prostatic epithelium that is able to prevent and ablate prostatic epithelial hyperplasia. Therefore, estrogens, acting in synergy with androgens and ERβ, are required to regulate the proliferative and antiproliferative changes that occur during normal prostate development and differentiation.
| Epithelial-Stromal Interactions|| |
Stromal-epithelial interactions play critical roles in the hormonal, cellular, and molecular regulation of normal and neoplastic prostatic development.  Aging permits gradual accumulation of prostate mass as a result of continuing glandular-stromal interactions, which may be enhanced by various growth factors provided systemically via the circulation or locally via the urethra. A study conducted by Cunha et al.  showed that stromal cells have the ability to modulate the differentiation pattern of normal prostatic epithelium. Other studies have shown that growth factors produced by both the epithelial and stromal cells can regulate the alternate cell type. Aberrant expression of peptide growth factors or their receptors can directly contribute to uncontrolled growth, resulting in BPH. The stromal cells are responsible for secreting many growth factors such as fibroblast growth factors, insulin-like growth factors I and II, as well as tumor growth factors, which act in an autocrine manner on the stroma itself as well as the neighboring glandular cells to induce proliferation.
The androgen-promoted production of KGF (FGF-7) by the fibroblasts of the stroma exercises a mitogenic action on epithelial cells, an effect probably mediated by the FGFR-2exonIIIb receptor. This receptor, a splice variant of FGFR-2, is expressed by epithelial cells and specifically recognizes KGF.  TGF-β, produced by stromal smooth muscle cells and considered to be directly concerned in the regulation of apoptosis,  inhibits this action of KGF. KGF, however, does not promote stromal-stromal-cell proliferation. FGF-2 promotes an autocrine mitogenic action in the stroma, mediated by the receptor FGF-R1, but has no effect on epithelial cells. FGFR1, encoded by the FGF-R1 (flg) gene, is normally localized only in stroma. The factors which control the growth and differentiation of the stromal cell population are still not well understood. Cultured fibroblasts produce FGF-2. DHT alone has no effect on prostatic fibroblast proliferation, but does in association with FGF-2.
Other components, which are thought to be involved in growth regulation and are secreted by the prostate cells are matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The production of MMPs by prostatic epithelial and/or neighboring stromal cells gives cells the capability to penetrate extracellular matrix barriers in normal or neoplastic growth. 
BPH involves qualitative and quantitative alterations in extracellular matrix components affecting stromal-epithelial interactions. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are polysaccharide components of the extracellular matrix whose role in the development of BPH is under investigation. The apparent increase in chondroitin sulphate and decrease in dermatan sulphate content in prostates of patients with BPH is in good agreement with the pathological manifestation of increased cell proliferation in hyperplastic prostate tissue, since these glycan molecules have been reported to increase and decrease cell proliferation, respectively. 
One of the organs believed to be influenced by the EGF system is the prostate gland. Stimulation with EGF induces proliferation of epithelial cells derived from the prostate. Proliferation of stromal cells from the prostate has also been shown to be increased by growth factor stimulation. In the prostate, the EGF system has also been suggested to play an important role for stroma-epithelium interactions. 
The interactions between the stromal and epithelial compartment of the prostate, which are transmitted through the extracellular matrix component, play a very important role in the etiology of BPH. Technological advances in both cellular and molecular biology will help to better elucidate these interactions and their important role in the development of BPH in the near future.
| Inflammatory Aspects Associated with BPH|| |
BPH nodules frequently occur concurrently with chronic inflammatory infiltrates, mainly composed of chronically activated T cells and macrophages. ,, Chronic inflammation may have a prominent role in BPH progression.
A causative role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of BPH was first proposed in 1937.  However, for the major part of the 20th century, the embryonal reawakening theory  dominated the field of BPH. Kohnen and Schaeffer reopened the discussion on the inflammatory nature of BPH 35 years ago. , Investigations of experimentally induced prostatitis in mice and rats suggested autoimmune responses, age-dependent hormonal imbalances, and genetic background to be causative factors. ,,,
Three recent reviews on the pathogenesis of BPH have provided an evidence based thesis that strongly suggests a role of inflammation in the propagation of histological BPH. ,,,, Kramer and Marberger  have recently outlined the current state of knowledge in regard to the influence of inflammation on the pathogenesis of BPH. Chronic inflammatory infiltrates, mainly composed of chronically activated T cells and macrophages frequently are associated with BPH nodules. ,, These infiltrating cells are responsible for the production of cytokines (IL-2 and IFNγ) which may support fibromuscular growth in BPH.  Immigration of T cells into the area is attracted by increased production of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-8, and IL-15. ,, Surrounding cells become targets and are killed (unknown mechanisms), leaving behind vacant spaces that are replaced by fibromuscular nodules with a specific pattern of a Th0/Th3 type of immune response.  What we do not know is why the leukocyte population increases in BPH. A number of hypotheses have been generated based on recent basic research. In-situ studies demonstrated elevated expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in BPH. IL-6, IL-8, and IL-17 may perpetuate chronic immune response in BPH and induce fibromuscular growth by an autocrine or paracrine loop , or via induction of COX-2 expression.  Immune reaction may be activated via Toll-like receptor signaling and mediated by macrophages and T cells.  Conversely, anti-inflammatory factors such as macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1  may be decreased in symptomatic BPH tissues. Animal models provided evidence for the presence of unique T-cell subsets which may suppress autoimmunity in healthy Sprague-Dawley rats resistant to chronic nonbacterial prostatitis.  Based on the available scientific evidence, that it is highly likely that age-dependent weakening of the immune system, coupled with modified hormonal secretion, leads to the deterioration of a postulated population of suppressor cells that actively suppresses the recognition of prostatic antigens which leads to gradual infiltration of the prostate by lymphocytes and subsequent cascade of events that leads to BPH. 
The pathogenesis of BPH is still not certain, although chronic inflammation may have a prominent role in disease progression. Regardless of its reasons, the end effect of chronic inflammation is an atypical cytokinerich milieu, which may lead to alterations in the microenvironment and a chronic repetitive wound healing ending in the development of BPH nodules. Further research is required to determine the putative (auto) antigen, the immune response of patients and a new classification of BPH quantifying local and systemic inflammatory/immune reactions in relation to clinical relevance. 
| Role of Prostatic Vascular System in the Development of BPH|| |
Recent studies in animal models have shown that the prostatic vascular system is also likely to be a primary target of androgen action. ,, It has been observed that one of the earliest postcastration physiologic changes in prostatic tissue is a dramatic reduction of blood flow. This change in blood flow was completely dependent upon declining androgen levels in these rats. Severe constriction of the prostatic vessels after castration was likely caused by a rapid decline of prostatic nitric oxide synthase activity, as reported by Hayek et al.  The mechanistic explanation for the rapid degeneration of the prostate gland capillary bed remains unclear at this time, although it is likely related to a complex change in vascular regulatory factors expressed by the prostate after castration.  It suggests that the later occurring loss of the bulk of prostate cells by apoptosis may be driven by the loss of appropriate oxygenation (hypoxia) or nutrition that occurs as a result of the loss of prostatic blood flow. It was proposed that the abnormal prostate growth process associated with human BPH must also be obligatorily accompanied by an angiogenic process providing sufficient nutrition and oxygenation for growing prostate cell survival. If this BPH-associated angiogenic process precedes the increase in prostate mass (as it does in the rat prostate model), then the prostatic vascular system should be considered a target for the development of therapies designed to slow or stop the abnormal prostate growth associated with BPH. Remarkably, this concept may already be apparent in the manner in which certain drug therapies are used to alleviate some of the noxious symptoms associated with BPH. Obviously, any agent that suppresses hematuria acts on the vascular system of the abnormal prostate, thus supporting the concept that the antiandrogenergic effects of finasteride work to suppress blood flow and vascular development in the abnormal prostate gland.
It is very interesting that cardiovascular disease is now being recognized as an important risk factor for BPH. , Because both diseases manifest in the population as a function of increasing age it would be tempting to think this is merely a correlative association. However, these studies , segregated age-matched populations into patients with clinical signs of cardiovascular disease/atherosclerosis/hypertension  versus those without, and the results indicated that patients with overt vascular pathology were at much higher risk for BPH then those without, regardless of age. Given this new information, it should not be surprising that there have been recent reports that laboratory rats with genetically inbred vascular dysfunctions (spontaneously hypertensive rats or SHR) also appear to develop a condition similar to BPH.  These rats were found to develop aging-associated benign proliferative lesions, mainly involving epithelial elements of the prostate gland. These lesions were noted to intensify over time. Likewise, Golomb et al.  showed that phenylephrine, an α-adrenergic agonist that induces hypertension, also induces atypical glandular BPH in treated rats. It remains to be explained why systemic vascular dysfunctions might specifically affect the prostate gland, a question that may be better answered with more research into the vascular system of the human prostate gland.
The idea was developed that the prostatic vascular system is an important component of prostate growth and regulation, and that dysfunction in blood flow to the prostate gland may be involved in the process through which BPH develops and is controlled.
| Altered Expression of Genes in BPH|| |
Gene expression analysis by DNA microarray technology has allowed us to investigate alterations in thousands of genes in diseased versus normal prostatic tissues. Genetic alterations associated with BPH have been an ongoing interest in many laboratories.
Gene expression patterns in BPH are different from normal and cancer. For example in a cluster analysis of more than 6,500 genes by Stamey et al. 22 genes were up-regulated
Luo et al.  reported that a subset of 76 genes involved in a wide range of cellular functions was identified to be differentially expressed between BPH and normal prostate tissues. Genes consistently upregulated in BPH when compared to normal prostate tissues included: a restricted set of growth factors and their binding proteins (e.g., IGF-1 and -2, TGF-beta3, BMP5, latent TGF-beta binding protein 1 and -2); hydrolases, proteases, and protease inhibitors (e.g., neuropathy target esterase, MMP2, alpha-2-macroglobulin); stress response enzymes (e.g., COX2, GSTM5); and extracellular matrix molecules (e.g., laminin alpha 4 and beta 1, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 2, lumican). Genes consistently expressing less mRNA in BPH than in normal prostate tissues were less commonly observed and included the transcription factor KLF4, thrombospondin 4, nitric oxide synthase 2A, transglutaminase 3, and gastrin releasing peptide.
In the study conducted by Kulkarni et al.,  the molecular differentiation in five groups were analyzed by using microarrays. A set of genes comprising mostly ESTs and several genes associated with cell proliferation (for example, calcium/calmodulin-dependent serine kinase, phosphoserine phosphatase, S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 or p45) were significantly up-regulated in the symptomatic BPH group, and a subset of genes including oncogenes and immediate early genes (for example, ras-related protein, v-jun, v-fos, immediate early protein, and early growth response gene) was highly up-regulated in the BPH with cancer group alone. Two subsets of genes including several inflammatory mediators (for example, lymphotoxin beta, immunoglobulins, and chemokine receptors), cytokines, and extracellular matrix-associated molecules (for example, RANTES, osteonectin, lumican) appear to distinguish symptomatic BPH and BPH with cancer as a separate group distinct from the normal or asymptomatic BPH groups. And a cluster of genes including mostly expressed sequence tag (EST) and genes with potential ORFs of unknown function distinguishes the asymptomatic BPH group from all of the others.
The data revealed in these analyses provide potential targets for biomarkers, as well as a method to classify states of the disease. By examining genes that are altered in BPH, a pathway of disease progression or onset may be determined. These analyses provide a provocative insight into the mechanisms, which underlie this highly prevalent disease of men.
| References|| |
|1.||Shabbir M, Mumtaz FH. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. J R Soc Health 2004;124:222-7. |
|2.||Lee C. Role of androgen in prostate growth and regression: Stromal-epithelial interaction. Prostate Suppl 1996;6:52-6. [PUBMED] |
|3.||Coffey DS. The molecular biology, endocrinology, and physiology of the prostate and seminal vesicles. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Stamey TA, Vaughan ED, editors. Campbell's Urology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1992. p. 221-301. |
|4.||Grayhack JT. Changes with aging in human seminal vesicle fluid fructose concentration and seminal vesicle weight. J Urol 1961;86:142-8. [PUBMED] |
|5.||Cunha G, Wang YZ, Hayward SW, Risbridger GP. Estrogenic effects on prostatic differentiation and carcinogenesis. Reprod Fertil Dev 2001;13:285-96. |
|6.||Ho SM. Estrogens and anti-estrogens: Key mediators of prostate carcinogenesis and new therapeutic candidates. J Cell Biochem 2004;91:491-503. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|7.||Harkonen PL, Makela SI. Role of estrogens in development of prostate cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004;92:297-305. |
|8.||Krieg M, Bartsch W, Thomsen M, Voigt KD. Androgens and estrogens: Their interaction with stroma and epithelium of human benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate. J Steroid Biochem 1983;19:155-61. [PUBMED] |
|9.||Harper ME, Pike A, Peeling WB, Griffiths K. Steroids of adrenal origin metabolized by human prostate tissue, both in vivo and in vitro. J Endocrinol 1974;60:117-25. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|10.||Krieg M, Nass R, Tunn S. Effect of aging on endogenous level of 5a-hihydrotestosterone, testosterone, estradiol and estrone in epithelium and stroma of normal and hyperplastic human prostate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993;77:375-61. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|11.||Shibata Y, Ito K, Suzuki K, Nakano K, Fukabori Y, Suzuki R, et al. Simultaneous quantitative analysis of prostate sex steroids and comparison with human prostatic histological composition. Prostate 2000;42:45-55. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|12.||Walsh PC, Wilson JD. The induction of prostatic hypertrophy in the dog with androstanediol. J Clin Invest 1976;57:1093-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|13.||Imamov O, Morani A, Shim GJ, Omoto Y, Thulin-Andersson C, Warner M, et al. Estrogen receptor b regulates epithelial cellular differentiation in the mouse ventral prostate. Proc Natl Acad 2004;101:9375-80. |
|14.||Weihua Z, Makela S, Andersson LC, Salmi S, Saji S, Webster JI, et al. A role for estrogen receptor b in the regulation of growth of the ventral prostate. Proc Natl Acad 2001;98:6330-5. |
|15.||Weihua Z, Warner M, Gustafsson JA. Estrogen receptor b in the prostate. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2002;193:1-5. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|16.||McPherson SJ, Wang H, Jones ME, Pedersen J, Iismaa TP, Wreford N, et al. Elevated androgens and prolactin in aromatase-deficient mice cause enlargement, but not malignancy, of the prostate gland. Endocrinology 2001;142:2458-67. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|17.||McPherson SJ, Ellem SJ, Simpson ER, Patchev V, Fritzemeier KH, Risbridger GP. Essential role for estrogen receptor b in stromal-epithelial regulation of prostatic hyperplasia. Endocrinology 2007;148:566-74. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|18.||Ellem SJ, Schmitt JF, Pedersen JS, Frydenberg M, Risbridger GP. Local aromatase expression in human prostate is altered in malignancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004;89:2434-41. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|19.||Shappell SB, Thomas GV, Roberts RL, Herbert R, Ittmann MM, Rubin MA, et al. Prostate pathology of genetically engineered mice: definitions and classification: The consensus report from the Bar Harbor meeting of the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium Prostate Pathology Committee. Cancer Res 2004;64:2270-305. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|20.||Cunha GR, Ricke W, Thomson A, Marker PC, Risbridger G, Hayward SW, et al. Hormonal, cellular, and molecular regulation of normal and neoplastic prostatic development. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2004:92:221-36. |
|21.||Cunha GR, Chung LW, Shannon JM, Taguchi O, Fujii H. Hormone induced morphogenesis and growth: Role of mesenchymal epithelial interactions. Recent Prog Horm Res 1983;39:559-98. [PUBMED] |
|22.||Yan G, Fukabori Y, McBride G, Nikolaropoulos S, McKeehan WL. Exon switching and activation of stromal and embryonic fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-FGF receptor genes in prostate epithelial cells accompany stromal independence and malignancy. Mol Cell Biol 1993;13:4513-22. |
|23.||Lee C, Sensibar JA, Dudek SM, Hiipakka RA, Liao ST. Prostatic ductal system in rats: Regional variation in morphological and functional activities. Biol Reprod 1990;43:1079-86. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|24.||Isaacs JT, Cussenot O, Jankevicius F, et al. Growth regulation of normal and malignant prostatic cells. In: Murphy G, Denis L, Chatelain C, Griffiths K, Khoury S, Cockett AT, editors. First International Consultation on Prostate Cancer. Paris: S.C.I.; 1997. p. 31-81. |
|25.||Wilson MJ, Sellers RG, Wiehr C, Melamud O, Pei D, Peehl DM. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and their inhibitors, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and -2, in primary cultures of human prostatic stromal and epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 2002;191:208-16. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|26.||Goulas A, Hatzichristou DG, Karakiulakis G, Mirtsou-Fidani V, Kalinderis A, Papakonstantinou E. Benign hyperplasia of the human prostate is associated with tissue enrichment in chondroitin sulphate of wide size distribution. Prostate 2000; 44:104-10. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|27.||Sorensen BS, Torring N, Bor MV, Nexo E. Quantitation of the mRNA expression of the epidermal growth factor system: Selective induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and amphiregulin expression by growth factor stimulation of prostate stromal cells. J Lab Clin Med 2000;136:209-17. |
|28.||Kohnen PW, Drach GW. Patterns of inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia: A histologic and bacterial study. J Urol 1979;121:755-60. [PUBMED] |
|29.||Theyer G, Kramer G. Assmann I, Sherwood E, Preinfalk W, Marberger M, et al. Phenotypic characterization of infiltrating leukocytes in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Lab Invest 1992;66:96-107. |
|30.||Steiner G, Gessl A, Kramer G, Schφllhammer A, Fφrster O, Marberger M. Phenotype and function of peripheral and prostatic lymphocytes in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1994;151:480-4. |
|31.||Moore RA. Inflammation of the prostate gland. J Urol 1937;38:173-82. |
|32.||McNeal J. Pathology of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Insight into etiology. Urol Clin North Am 1990;17:477-86. [PUBMED] |
|33.||Kohnen PW, Drach GW. Patterns of inflammation in prostatic hyperplasia: A histologic and bacteriologic study. J Urol 1979;121:755-60. [PUBMED] |
|34.||Schaeffer AJ, Wendel EF, Dunn JK, Grayhack JT. Prevalence and significance of prostatic inflammation. J Urol 1981;125:215-9. [PUBMED] |
|35.||Robinette CL. Sex-hormone-induced inflammation and fibromuscular proliferation in the rat lateral prostate. Prostate 1988;12:271-86. [PUBMED] |
|36.||Naslund MJ, Strandberg JD, Coffey DS. The role of androgens and estrogens in the pathogenesis of experimental nonbacterial prostatitis. J Urol 1988;140:1049-53. [PUBMED] |
|37.||Taguchi O, Kojima A, Nishizuka Y. Experimental autoimmune prostatitis after neonatal thymectomy in the mouse. Clin Exp Immunol 1985;60:123-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|38.||Taguchi O, Nishizuka Y. Self tolerance and localised autoimmunity; Mouse models of autoimmune disease that suggest tissue-specific suppressor T cells are involved in self tolerance. J Exp Med 1987;165:146-56. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|39.||Lee Keith L, Peehl Donna M. Molecular and cellular pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;172:1784-91. |
|40.||Untergasser G, Madersbacher S, Berger P. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: Age-related tissueremodeling. Exp Gerontol 2005;40:121-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|41.||Kramer G, Marberger M. Could Inflammation be a key component in the progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Opin in Urol 2006;16:25-9. |
|42.||Kramer G, Steiner GE, Handisurya A, Stix U, Haitel A, Knerer B, et al. Increased expression of lymphocyte-derived cytokines in benign hyperplastic prostate tissue, identification of the producing cell types and effect of differentially expressed cytokines on stromal cell proliferation. Prostate 2002;52:43-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|43.||Lee KL, Peehl D. Molecular and cellular pathogenesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2004;172:1784-91. |
|44.||Handisurya A, Steiner GE, Stix U, Ecker RC, Pfaffeneder-Mantai S, Langer D, et al. Differential expression of interleukin- 15, a pro-inflammatory cytokine and T-cell growth factor, and its receptor in human prostate. Prostate 2001;49:251-62. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|45.||Steiner G, Stix U, Handisurya A, Willheim M, Haitel A, Reithmayr R, et al. Cytokine expression pattern in benign prostatic hyperplasia infiltrating T cells and impact of lymphocytic infiltration on cytokine mRNA profile in prostatic tissue. Lab Invest 2003;83:1131-46. |
|46.||Konig JE, Senge T, Allhoff EP, Konig W. Analysis of the inflammatory network in benign prostate hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Prostate 2004;58:121-9. |
|47.||Wang W, Bergh A, Damber JE. Chronic inflammation in benign prostate hyperplasia is associated with focal upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2, Bcl-2, and cell proliferation in the glandular epithelium. Prostate 2004;61:60-72. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|48.||Kakehi Y, Segawa T, Wu XX, Kulkarni P, Dhir R, Getzenberg RH. Down-regulation of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1/prostate derived factor in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 2004;59:351-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|49.||Vykhovanets EV, Resnick MI, Marengo SR. The healthy rat prostate contains high levels of natural killer-like cells and unique subsets of CD4+ helperinducer T cells: Implications for prostatitis. J Urol 2005;173:1004-10. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|50.||Kramer G, Mitteregger, Marberger M. Is Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) an immune inflammatory disease? Europ Urol 2007;51:1202-16. |
|51.||Lekas E, Johansson M, Widmark A, Bergh A, Damber JE. Decrement of blood flow precedes the involution of the ventral prostate in the rat after castration. Urol Res 1997;25:309-14. |
|52.||Shabsigh A, Chang DT, Heitjan DF, Kiss A, Olsson CA, Puchner PJ, et al. Rapid reduction in blood flow to the rat ventral prostate gland after castration: Preliminary evidence that androgens influence prostate size by regulating blood flow to the prostate gland and prostatic endothelial cell survival. Prostate 1998;36:201-6. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|53.||Shabsigh A, Tanji N, D'Agati V, Burchardt M, Rubin M, Goluboff ET, et al. Early effects of castration on the vascular system of the rat ventral prostate gland. Endocrinology 1999;140:1920-6. |
|54.||Hayek OR, Shabsigh A, Kaplan SA, Kiss AJ, Chen MW, Burchardt T, et al. Castration induces acute vasoconstriction of blood vessels in the rat prostate concomitant with a reduction of prostatic nitric oxidesynthase activity. J Urol 1999;162:1527-31. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|55.||Ghafar MA, Shabsigh A, Anastasiadis AG. The effects of castration on the production of vaso-regulatory substances in the rat prostate gland. J Urol 2001;165:875. |
|56.||Meigs JB, Mohr B, Barry MJ, Collins MM, McKinlay JB. Risk factors for clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia in a community-based population of healthy aging men. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:935-44. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|57.||Weisman KM, Larijani GE, Goldstein MR, Goldberg ME. Relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and history of coronary artery disease in elderly men. Pharmacotherapy 2000;20:383-6. [PUBMED] |
|58.||Golomb E, Rosenzweig N, Eilam R, Abramovici A. Spontaneous hyperplasia of the ventral lobe of the prostate in aging genetically hypertensive rats. J Androl 2000;21:58-64. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|59.||Golomb E, Kruglikova A, Dvir D, Parnes N, Abramovici A. Induction of atypical prostatic hyperplasia in rats by sympathomimetic stimulation. Prostate 1998;34:214-21. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|60.||Luo J, Dunn T, Ewing C, Sauvageot J, Chen Y, Trent J, et al. Gene expression signature of benign prostatic hyperplasia revealed by cDNA microarray analysis. Prostate 2002;51:189-200. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|61.||Prakash K, Pirozzi G, Elashoff M, Munger W, Waga I, Dhir R, et al. Symptomatic and asymptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: Molecular differentiation by using microarrays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:7598-603. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
|This article has been cited by|
||Prostate Stem Cells in the Development of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer: Emerging Role and Concepts
| ||Akhilesh Prajapati,Sharad Gupta,Bhavesh Mistry,Sarita Gupta |
| ||BioMed Research International. 2013; 2013: 1 |
||CCR2 and CCR5 genes polymorphisms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer
| ||Francis Maria Báo Zambra,Vanderlei Biolchi,Ilma Simoni Brum,José Artur Bogo Chies |
| ||Human Immunology. 2013; 74(8): 1003 |
||Is There a Relationship Between Bladder Outlet Obstruction due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Pulmonary Thromboembolism?
| ||Hannah E. Rosenfeld, Roger W. Byard |
| ||Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2012; : no |
||Characteristics of baseline PSA and PSA velocity in young men without prostate cancer: Racial differences
| ||Ping Tang, Wei Du, Keji Xie, Jingao Fu, Hui Chen, Wenjun Yang, Judd W. Moul |
| ||The Prostate. 2011; : n/a |
||Differential effects of coenzyme Q10 and α-lipoic acid on two models of in vitro oxidative damage to the rabbit urinary bladder
| ||Hsin T. Li, Catherine Schuler, Robert E. Leggett, Robert M. Levin |
| ||International Urology and Nephrology. 2011; 43(1): 91 |