Indian Journal of Urology Users online:681  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
UROSCAN
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 281-282
 

What is the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced and lymph node-positive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy?


Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, SGPGIMS, Raibareilly Road, Lucknow-226 014, India

Date of Web Publication24-Jun-2009

Correspondence Address:
Aneesh Srivastava
Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, SGPGIMS, Raibareilly Road, Lucknow-226 014
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 19672373

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 

How to cite this article:
Maheshwari R, Srivastava A. What is the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced and lymph node-positive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy?. Indian J Urol 2009;25:281-2

How to cite this URL:
Maheshwari R, Srivastava A. What is the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced and lymph node-positive bladder cancer after radical cystectomy?. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2019 Oct 23];25:281-2. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2009/25/2/281/52920

Walz J, Shariat SF, Suardi N, Perrotte P, Lotan Y, Palapattu GS, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer does not alter cancer-specific survival after cystectomy in a matched case-control study. BJU Int 2008;101:1356-61.



   Summary Top


Within a study group of 958 patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC), the authors identified 274 (29.0%) with a high risk of progression due to pT3 or pT4 and/or pN1-3 stages. Of these, 129 (46.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACHT), [Methotrexate, Vincristine, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide(MVAC) in 103, Gemcetabine and

Cis-platin (GC) in 26]. These patients were then matched with the remaining patients who were unexposed to ACHT. Exact matches were made for age year of surgery, pT stage, tumor grade, pN stage and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). Matching resulted in 62 patients treated with RC/ACHT and 65 treated with RC alone.

The median (range) follow-up in event-free patients was 2.4 (0.1-11.6) years. Cancer-specific mortality was documented in 115 patients (41.5%) during the follow-up. The median actuarial cancer-specific survival (CSS) was 5.3 years (mean 7.1). In the overall cohort, the mean (95% confidence interval) CSS probabilities were 64.2 (58.2-70.8), 51.3 (44.6-59.1) and 37.7% (29.5-48.2), respectively, at 2, 5 and 10 years after RC. The median actuarial overall survival (OS) was 3.7 years (mean 10.1). The OS probabilities were 60.7 (54.8-67.3), 44.9 (38.3-52.7) and 25.9% (18.4-36.6), respectively, at 2, 5 and 10 years after RC in the overall cohort.

There was no statistically significant difference in age (P = 0.8), year of surgery (P = 0.7), tumor grade (P = 0.9), tumor stage (P = 0.7), rate of LVI (P = 0.2) and rate of lymph node invasion (P = 0.2) between the groups. CSS and OS were not significantly different between the overall cohort and the matched cohort (P = 0.6 and 0.7, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in CSS (relative risk 1.2; log-rank P = 0.5) or in OS (relative risk 1.1; log-rank P = 0.7) between the groups, nor was there a statistical significance in the CSS (log rank P = 0.9) or in the OS (log-rank P = 0.9) between the two ACHT regimens. [1]


   Comments Top


The rational for adjuvant chemotherapy is that patients with pathologically staged tumors with evidence of metastatic disease may benefit from systemic therapy, which could reduce the likelihood of local recurrence or distant metastatic relapse. Translating the high response seen in locally advanced disease into long-term survival in the locally advanced carcinoma bladder has not been proved consistently. [2]

This is a multiinstitutional, well-matched, case-control study in which the authors have taken OS and CSS as end-points that are considered to be more important for any trial addressing cancer control. Because of the well-matched design of the study, no further statistical adjustment for the variable was needed. The authors have concluded that adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve either CSS or OS in high-risk patients. The results are comparable to previous studies. [3],[4] The advanced bladder cancer metaanalysis collaboration has also concluded about insufficient evidence on which to reliably base treatment decisions. [5]

The study has its own shortcomings due to the retrospective nature of this study. The study population comprises 62 and 65 patients respectively in the ACHT and the no-ACHT arms thus lacking power. This limitation is shared by all the previous studies. The case-control study inherits certain flaws, which is another important limitation. The study duration of 20 years is another limitation as contemporary patients have better prognosis. Certain limitations are due to the multiinstitutional design and lack of unified protocol for administration of chemotherapy and absence of central pathological service. The study did not give any data on salvage chemotherapy.

In view of the evidence from the literature, it may be prudent to review our treatment protocols for locally advanced bladder tumor. This study also highlights the need for a multiinstitutional randomized control trial with statistical power to further clarify the status of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer.

 
   References Top

1.Walz J, Shariat SF, Suardi N, Perrotte P, Lotan Y, Palapattu GS, et al . Adjuvant chemotherapy for bladder cancer does not alter cancer-specific survival after cystectomy in a matched case-control study B J U Int 2008;101:1356-61.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Aparicio AM, Elkhouiery AB, Quinn DI. The current and future application of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy in patients with bladder cancer following cystectomy. Urol Clin N Am 2005;32: 217-30.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Studer UE, Bacchi M, Biedermann C, Jaeger P, Kraft R, Mazzucchelli L, et al . Adjuvant cisplatin chemotherapy following cystectomy for bladder cancer: Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol 1994;152:81-4.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Lehmann J, Franzaring L, Thuroff J, Wellek S, Stockle M. Complete long term survival data from a trial of adjuvant chemotherapy vs. control after radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer. BJU Int 2006;97:42-7.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data. Eur Urol 2005;48:189-201.  Back to cited text no. 5  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (57 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Summary
    Comments
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1767    
    Printed60    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded158    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA