Indian Journal of Urology Users online:3172  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
SYMPOSIUM
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 92-98

Perineal sound recording for diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction


1 Department of Urology, Sector Furore, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
2 Department of Neuroscience, Vestibular Group, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Correspondence Address:
Tim Idzenga
Deptartment of Urology, Erasmus MC, Room Ee1630, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam
Netherlands
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.45545

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: Elderly men are prone to developing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) possibly caused by bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The most frequently used method to diagnose this condition is an invasive and time-consuming pressure-flow study. We are developing a novel non-invasive method to diagnose BOO in men with LUTS based on perineal sound recording. Methods: A biophysical model urethra was made from polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) cryogel with viscoelastic properties comparable to those of the male pig urethra. To this model different degrees of obstruction were applied and sound was recorded at different positions downstream of the obstruction. In a study in 16 healthy male volunteers the variability and repeatability of perineal sound recording was tested. Results: In the model three parameters, derived from the frequency spectrum of the recorded sound (i.e., weighted average frequency, standard deviation and skewness) are uniquely related to the degree of obstruction (linear regression, P<0.001). The variability of perineal sound recording in healthy male volunteers was found to be smaller within volunteers than between volunteers (Kruskal-Wallis, P<0.001) and the repeatability was comparable to that of the maximum flow rate. Conclusions: We conclude that perineal sound recordings are significantly different between volunteers. In combination with the unique relations found in the model-experiments these results increase the probability that perineal sound recording can be used as a simple and cheap non-invasive method to diagnose BOO. Clinical testing of this method is therefore strongly indicated.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2562    
    Printed103    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded262    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal

 

HEALTHWARE INDIA