Indian Journal of Urology Users online:361  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
SYMPOSIUM
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 551-554

Lower pole calculi larger than one centimeter: Retrograde intrarenal surgery


Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence Address:
Andreas J Gross
Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Department of Urology, Ruebenkamp 220, 22291 Hamburg
Germany
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.44266

Rights and Permissions

Controversy remains on how to treat lower pole calculi between 1 and 2 cm of size. Treatment options like shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) or percutaneous stone treatment (PCNL) are associated with poor stone-free rates or high morbidity. Due to the ongoing development in endourologic technology, especially in flexible renoscopy, laser technique and grasping devices (tipless Nitinol baskets) retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) has become an option in treating these patients. Based on personal experience and an overview of the published literature we discuss RIRS as a valuable alternative to PCNL in treating patients with larger calculi of the lower pole. The technical developments in laser technology as well as significant improvement in flexible renoscopes have made RIRS for larger lower pole stones possible. The low complication rate gives RIRS for lower pole stones superiority over the invasive percutaneous approach, which is associated with significant morbidity, even in experienced hands.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7327    
    Printed91    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded280    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal

 

HEALTHWARE INDIA