Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1324  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
SURGICAL CRAFT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 265-266
 

No more shoulders: Technical modification of Byars' flaps


Department of Urology, University of California Davis Children's Hospital, Sacramento, CA, USA

Correspondence Address:
Nicholas Hellenthal
Department of Urology, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y St, Suite 3500, Sacramento, CA 95817
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.40629

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

The repair of midshaft or more proximal hypospadias generally leads to a deficiency of ventral penile skin. Transposition of dorsal/lateral skin flaps may lead to redundant skin folds or shoulders. In most cases, redundant skin can be avoided by appropriate tailoring and positioning of the flaps. We describe a simple method to correct these folds when they are unavoidable.


Keywords: Hypospadias, plastic, surgery, surgical flaps


How to cite this article:
Kurzrock EA, Hellenthal N. No more shoulders: Technical modification of Byars' flaps. Indian J Urol 2008;24:265-6

How to cite this URL:
Kurzrock EA, Hellenthal N. No more shoulders: Technical modification of Byars' flaps. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Sep 22];24:265-6. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2008/24/2/265/40629



   Introduction Top


There are three major components to hypospadias surgery: repair of chordee, urethroplasty and remodeling of the preputial, and penile skin. The repair of midshaft or more proximal hypospadias generally leads to a deficiency of ventral penile skin. The most popular techniques for covering the ventral penis entail sagital or transverse incision of the dorsal preputium. The dorsal and lateral preputial/penile skin is then transposed as a bi-pedicle visor flap, as described by Ombredanne and popularized by Nesbit, Byars' flaps or as a button-hole transposition. [1],[2],[3],[4] All these techniques may lead to redundant skin folds (bumps, dog ears, or shoulders) on the lateral aspects of the penis. [5]

These skin folds occur from either bunching of the skin and/or transposition of redundant dorsal preputial skin. In most cases the redundant skin can be diminished with careful placement and tailoring of the flaps. However, in a minority of cases the redundancy of skin seems unavoidable. Simple excision of the folds is dangerous as the underlying blood vessels supply the flaps. To avoid lateral folds, Koltuksuz et al . proposed covering the dorsal penis with preputium and transposing the dorsal/lateral penile skin ventrally. [6] This has not become popular possibly due to the poor esthetics of the entire dorsal penis being covered with preputial skin. Kaplan has successfully utilized a preputial island flap for ventral skin coverage which avoids folds. [7]

We have been using a simple technique for correction of redundant skin folds following Byars' flaps. The technique is described and the long-term results are presented.


   Technique Top


After completion of the corporoplasty and urethroplasty, the deficiency of ventral skin is measured. We utilize Firlit collars in all patients. [8] The dorsal preputial/penile skin is divided sagitally for the creation of Byars' flaps. Excess preputial skin is excised and the flaps are sewn to the coronal margin and to the inferior edges of the Firlit collars. Depending upon the ventral defect, the flaps are sewn to each other in the midline or crossed. In most cases, redundant lateral skin folds are avoided by appropriate tailoring and positioning of the flaps.

For those boys left with lateral folds, the overlying skin is marked with a blue pen. The skin folds are de-epithelialized using curved iris scissors with the tips up [Figure - 1]. After all the marked epithelium has been excised, the skin edges are reapproximated with interrupted sutures. More than 10 patients have undergone this modification of Byars' flaps with excellent postoperative penile form one year after surgery. No child has suffered evident ischemia, necrosis, or contraction of ventral skin.


   Discussion Top


A successful hypospadias repair requires construction of a functional urethra, straightening of the penis, and appropriate skin coverage. There are few options to cover the ventral penis, all of which require transposition of dorsal/lateral skin. The redundant lateral skin folds that occur during skin coverage in some cases can compromise the cosmetic result of the repair. While there have been numerous techniques described and implemented for hypospadias repair, there is little written on the management of redundant lateral skin.

When we first contemplated the problem of redundant lateral skin folds, we thought the underlying fat was the culprit. In some boys who did not require Byar's flaps, we removed the fat (prior to excising the skin flaps). We were surprised to find that most of the fold remained. The excess wrinkled skin turned out to be the main factor creating the folds, not the underlying fat. Our described technique removes this skin. In addition, the reapproximation of the skin edges appears to invert the underlying fat and vasculature inward.


   Conclusions Top


Redundant skin folds or shoulders from Byars' flaps can be avoided in most cases by careful positioning and tailoring of skin flaps. When necessary, de-epithelialization of the redundant skin and reapproximation provides a natural, lasting cosmetic result without compromising the underlying blood supply to the ventral skin.

 
   References Top

1.Belman AB. Hypospadias and other urethral anomalies. In : Clinical pediatric urology, 3rd ed. Kelalis PP, King LR, Belman AB, editors. vol. 1, Saunders: Philadelphia; 1992. p. 638-53.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Byars LT. Surgical repair of hypospadias. Surg Clin North Am 1950;30:1371-5.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  
3.Nesbit RM. Plastic procedure for correction of hypospadias. J Urol 1941;45:699-701.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Nesbit RM. Operation for correction of distal penile ventral curvature with or without hypospadias. J Urol 1967;97:720-2.  Back to cited text no. 4  [PUBMED]  
5.Aktug T, Akgur FM, Olguner M, Eroπlu G, Hosg φr M. Outpatient catheterless Mathieu repair: How to cover ventral penile skin defect. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1992;2:99-101.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Koltuksuz U, Gursoy MH, Aydinc M, Mutus M, Cetin S, Karaman A. An alternative way to cover ventral penile skin defect in Mathieu technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2000;10:232-4.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Kaplan GW. Repair of proximal hypospadias using a preputial free graft for neourethral construction and a preputial pedicle flap for ventral skin coverage. J Urol 1988;140:1270-2.  Back to cited text no. 7  [PUBMED]  
8.Firlit CF. The mucosal collar in hypospadias surgery. J Urol 1987;137:80-2.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  


    Figures

  [Figure - 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (85 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Technique
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2831    
    Printed98    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded267    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA