Indian Journal of Urology Users online:1256  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
SURGICAL CRAFT
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 24  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 118-119
 

Synchronous twin track percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A preliminary experience


1 Department of Urology, Vedanayagam Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Urology, Vikram Hospital and Heart Care, Mysore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
R Krishna Rao
Rockhampton Base Hospital, Canning Street, Rockhampton, Queensland 4701, Australia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.38618

Rights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is the treatment of choice for large renal calculi. Total stone clearance as the treatment goal remains elusive, despite staged procedures and multiple tracks. There is also the morbidity of multiple sittings and tracks. We investigated the feasibility of a synchronized approach to clearing these difficult stones with two teams operating through two or more tracks in tandem and also the ergonomic and logistic issues involved.


Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, staghorn calculi, synchronous


How to cite this article:
Kandasami S V, Rao R K, Arul M, Ranganath M S, Prasad T K. Synchronous twin track percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A preliminary experience. Indian J Urol 2008;24:118-9

How to cite this URL:
Kandasami S V, Rao R K, Arul M, Ranganath M S, Prasad T K. Synchronous twin track percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A preliminary experience. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Oct 15];24:118-9. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2008/24/1/118/38618



   Materials and Methods Top


Four men and one woman (average age: 48 years) underwent this procedure between March 2006 and February 2007. Their staghorn stones ranged in size from 5.3 cm 3.6 cm to 3.2 cm 2.5 cm. Two surgeons performed the procedure using two sets of Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) equipment; three patients required three tracks while two required two tracks [Figure - 1],[Figure - 2].


   Results Top


All patients withstood the procedure well, mean operating time ranged from one and a half hours to two and a half hours (average two hours). Three patients required a second look procedure for residual fragments. On completion of the treatment three patients had residual fragments of size less than 8 mm. There were no significant postoperative complications; two patients had fever which settled with conservative treatment. Average hospital stay was five days.


   Discussion Top


Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is now the standard technique for staghorn renal calculi. [1] Improved instrumentation and technical advancement have enabled urologists to perform percutaneous stone removal with increasing efficacy and decreasing complications. [2] There is, however, a decrease in the overall stone-free rate, an increase in the complication rate, the secondary procedure rate, the mean operative time and the need for multiple tracts, with increasing stone surface area. [3]

Our indications for this approach were large stone surface area, complex pelvicalyceal anatomy where two or more tracks were deemed necessary to clear the calculi.

Synchronous PCNL requires two experienced surgeons working together, assistants and nursing staff familiar with the technique and two complete sets of instruments including telescopes, cameras, monitors, energy sources and grasping instruments. A solitary C-arm is adequate as the imaging modality, but necessitates preliminary planning of track placement which has to be done sequentially.

Tracks are placed ideally in the superior and inferior calyx at an obtuse angle in relation to each other such that the telescopes with all the attached cables and irrigation sets do not get entangled. The single C-arm limits the angles from which each surgeon can view the position of guide wires and scopes, so meticulous planning and cooperation are paramount [Figure - 3].

The advantages when compared to the single-team PCNL are manifold. Operating time and blood loss are reduced; there are multiple views of the stone/s.

To reduce intrarenal pressure and irrigating fluid absorption we use the largest available (32 Fr) Amplatz thus ensuring free flow of effluent between the sheath and the nephroscope (27 Fr). The theoretical risk of extensive renal laceration due to counter traction and aggressive manipulation is obviated by close coordination between the two operating teams. Postoperative Intravenous Urogram in four patients revealed no anatomical evidence of renal damage.

This first description of Synchronous Twin Track PCNL in a single renal unit by two operating teams indicates that the procedure is feasible, safe and worthy of further evaluation.


   Conclusion Top


Synchronous Twin track PCNL is a potentially ideal operation for complete clearance of large, complex staghorn calculi. Future areas for investigation include quantifying blood loss, intrarenal pressures, irrigant absorption and renal damage. The need for two experienced teams operating in tandem with two complete sets of instruments would limit the technique to hospitals where these are available.

 
   References Top

1.Miller NL, Lingeman JE. Management of kidney stones. BMJ 2007;334:468-72.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
2.Lingeman JE, Newmark JR, Wong MY. Classification and management of staghorn calculi. In : Smith AD, editor. Controversies in endourology. WB Saunders: Philadelphia; p. 136-44.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Turna B, Umul M, Demiryoguran S, Altay B, Nazli O. How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 2007;21:34-43.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (119 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2717    
    Printed98    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded152    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA