Indian Journal of Urology Users online:709  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
UROSCAN
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 282-283
 

Best method to biopsy the prostate


Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Correspondence Address:
N Gupta
Department of Urology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 

How to cite this article:
Gupta N, Srivastava A. Best method to biopsy the prostate. Indian J Urol 2006;22:282-3

How to cite this URL:
Gupta N, Srivastava A. Best method to biopsy the prostate. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2006 [cited 2019 Aug 23];22:282-3. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2006/22/3/282/27649

Klaus Eichler, Susanne Hempel, Jennifer Wilby, Lindsey Myers, Lucas M. Bachmann and Jos Kleijnen. Diagnostic Value of Systematic Biopsy Methods in the Investigation of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. J Urol. Vol. 175, 1605-1612, May 2006.



   Summary Top


Several biopsy techniques have been proposed for the diagnosis of prostate cancer especially the extended techniques with more than six cores. This article has systematically compared the cancer detection rates and complications of different extended prostate biopsy schemes to identify the optimal scheme. A total of 68 studies that compared different systematic prostate biopsy methods using sequential sampling or a randomized design in men scheduled for biopsy due to suspected prostate cancer were included and analyzed. It was found that an increasing number of cores were significantly associated with the cancer yield. Laterally directed cores increased the yield significantly ( P = 0.003), whereas centrally directed cores did not. Schemes with 12 cores that took additional laterally directed cores detected 31% more cancers than the sextant scheme. Schemes with 18 to 24 cores did not detect significantly more cancers. Adverse events for schemes up to 12 cores were similar to those for the sextant pattern. Adverse event reporting was poor for schemes with 18 to 24 cores. Thus prostate biopsy using 12 cores including the laterally directed cores strikes the balance between cancer detection rates and adverse events.


   Comments Top


For many years the systematic sextant biopsy protocol, a fixed pattern with six cores from the paramedian prostate regions, has been the standard procedure, however, several new extended prostate biopsy schemes to confirm cancer in men with a positive PSA test result and/or positive digital rectal examination have been discussed recently. This article systematically reviews the literature to compare the cancer detection rates and complications of different extended prostate biopsy schemes for diagnostic evaluation in men scheduled for biopsy. Adopting strict inclusion criteria of including only the studies that compared the two schemes i.e., standard and the extended in the same population, is a strong point of this review. A five-region anatomical model has been used to compare the standard and the extended biopsy schemes and grouping of various schemes has been done on the basis of number and pattern of cores. This review brings to light the poor reporting of adverse events by primary studies and the insufficient evidence to determine whether extended biopsy schemes increase the rate of major adverse events. The article however highlights the importance of taking at least 12 cores including laterally directed cores to optimize cancer detection rate in ca prostate.




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (78 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Summary
    Comments

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2048    
    Printed66    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded146    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA