Indian Journal of Urology Users online:41  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2004  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 123-125
 

Penile fractures: Results of delayed repair


Department of Urology, KLE Society's Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Belgaum, India

Correspondence Address:
Manohar Shetty
Department of Urology, KLES Hospital and MRC, Nehrunagar, Belgaum - 590 010
India
Login to access the Email id


Get Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Objectives : To assess the results of delayed repair of penile fractures.
Methods: The patients presenting with penile fractures constituted study group. Those who have come after 24 hours of sustaining , penile injury are considered as de­layed presentation. Five of the total 7 patients were in delayed group. All the patients were treated by surgical correction.
Results: Except for mild wound infection in 2 patients, there were no bothersome complications. The results were as good as with early repair and there was no increased risk of erectile dysfunction in penile fractures.
Conclusions: The surgical correction need not be de­ferred in delayed presentation of penile fractures.


Keywords: Fracture penis, tunica albuginea. delayed repair, erectile dysfunction.


How to cite this article:
Shetty M, Nerli R B, Kamat S, Sadalge A, Patil VK, Amarkhed S. Penile fractures: Results of delayed repair. Indian J Urol 2004;20:123-5

How to cite this URL:
Shetty M, Nerli R B, Kamat S, Sadalge A, Patil VK, Amarkhed S. Penile fractures: Results of delayed repair. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2004 [cited 2014 Nov 28];20:123-5. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2004/20/2/123/21526



   Introduction Top

"The harder the penis is, the more vulnerable it is to injury". Fracture penis (rupture of the tunica albuginea or corpus cavernosum) is a rare but probably under-reported entity and it truly represents an urological emergency. [1] Penile fractures occur to the erect penis as a result of blunt trauma commonly during coitus or masturbation. [2] Frac­ture is normally manifested by a cracking sound accom­panied by immediate severe pain and detumescence, followed by rapid swelling and widespread echymosis. [3] A palpable tunical defect and a hematoma with a "rolling sign" are pathognomonic features. [4] All recent reports favor early surgical repair due to the adequate functional and cosmetic results with minimal complications and this is in contrast to old reports favoring conservative management. [2] This is because conservative treatment is associated with very high complication rates reaching as high as 53% of patients. [5] However, the timing of repair from the time of injury has never been well defined, although most series indicate that repair is needed as soon as the patient presents; but unfortunately due to the social and personal scenario surrounding the occurrence of these events some men may delay seeking medical help immediately. [6] This is more so in developing countries due to poverty, ignorance, living in remote places, poor transportation, etc. There are very few reports available on the results of delayed repair of penile fracture. We have evaluated our own experience with 7 patients of penile fractures, majority of whom un­derwent delayed repair.


   Patients and Methods Top


Over a period of 7 years between 1996 and 2002 we have treated 7 patients with penile fractures. Among them, 5 patients presented to us 24 hours after sustaining penile injury. All the 7 patients were treated by surgical explora­tion because of the presence of significant hematoma. The repair was done with subcoronal circumferential deglov­ing incision with evacuation of hematoma and repair of the laceration using 3-0 vicryl suture material with inter­rupted, inverting knots. Watertight closure was confirmed at the end of repair by artificial induction of erection by saline injection. The skin was approximated using 3-0 catgut. The patients were discharged second day onwards depending on the wound status. The follow up period ranged from 7 weeks to 2 years during which the history was taken regarding erectile activity, pain, sexual perform­ance, presence of nodule/plaque and angulation followed by physical examination of the penis. Details of the pa­tients are summarized in Table.


   Results Top


Five out of 7 patients underwent repair 24 hours after sustaining penile injury which we considered as delayed repair. The dissection in these patients was not difficult except in 1 wherein the delay was 8 days. The tear size ranged from 1.0 x 0.5 cm to 2.5 x 1.5 cm. The patients were discharged if the wound was found healthy. Three patients were discharged on 2nd postoperative day, 2 on 3rd , 1 on 5th and another on 8 th postoperative days (average 3.6 days). Two patients developed mild postoperative wound infection, which was treated with antibiotic and wound dressing. In the follow-up period, 2 patients com­plained of slight bend of the penis to the affected side but with no sexual problem. On artificial induction of erec­tion in these 2 patients there was only minimal deviation of the penis to the side of repair without any chordee. There was no history of erectile dysfunction in any of the pa­tients.


   Discussion Top


Penile fracture, even though uncommon, is an urologic emergency that may have devastating physical and psy­chological consequences. The prompt diagnosis and ex­pedient surgical correction of the condition gives excellent results. The rupture of tunica albuginea occurs due to its marked thinning from a resting thickness of 2 mm to 0.25-­0.5 mm on erection together with the associated marked short-term pressure increases (intracaversonal pressures exceeding 450 mm Hg), which approach or exceed the tunica tensile strength during acute abrupt loading or bend­ing of the erect penis. [2] The classical pathological injury to the erect penis is usually a transverse tunical rupture of one corporal body, but the involvement of both corpora, corpus spongiosum and urethra can occur. [2],[7] Small inju­ries to the tunica albuginea that go unrecognized may re­sult in Peyronie's disease and/or impotence. [7] However, recent reports suggest that penile fracture is not associ­ated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction. [8],[9]

Immediate surgical correction of the tunical defect is recommended which not only decreases the length of hos­pital stay but also allows early resumption of sexual ac­tivity, [8],[9] minimizes the risk of complications like fibrous tissue formation, chordee, painful erection and other psy­chosocial problems. [9] But due to various reasons patient may present to us after days of sustaining penile fracture. There is no clear description of what is delayed repair. Even though Cummings et al [6] have described delayed re­pair defined as more than 8 hours after injury, we have considered a delay of more than 24 hours as delayed re­pair. There are few reports of delayed repair. In a report by Anselmo et al [10] two patients underwent delayed repair at 2 and another at 8 days of injury with latter patient hav­ing a good result and the other had a, mild chordee with a fibrous area. Cummings et al [6] in their report of 3 patients with a delay of 24-40 hours found good results with nor­mal straight erections postoperatively. Cendrom et al [1] also observed similar encouraging results in their series.

In our group of 7 patients, 5 (71%) attended our hospi­tal more than 24 hours after sustaining injury and in all the patients surgical corrections were performed. We have used subcoronal circumferential degloving incision for all patients. The average size of the tunica albuginea lacera­tions was 1.7 x 1.0 cm [Figure - 1]. Such large tears are also noted by Cummings et all (1.5, 2 and 3 cm), Cendron et al' (2, 3 and 3 x 2 cm) and Kundu et al" (1-2.5 cm). In all likelihood, this much large defects would have healed with a significant scarring if treated conservatively leading to development of chordee. The wide separation of the trans­versely torn edges of tunica albuginea is probably due to the retraction of the longitudinally arranged elastic fibers in it. The presence of hematoma may add to the local fi­brous reaction. So, the evacuation of hematoma and ap­proximation of torn edges of the tunica albuginea should give much better results than conservatively managed pa­tients irrespective of the time of repair. The generally ac­cepted procedure in delayed presentation of penile fractures is to do surgery only if there is extensive/increas­ing hematoma or extravasation of contrast on cavernoso­gram and in others a conservative management is suggested. With our experience this is to be questioned and we suggest surgical correction in all cases of fracture penis irrespective of the time of seeking treatment. Javaad Zargooshi. [8] in his review of 170 cases, has concluded that there is no relationship between the time of repair and the development of complications, and no difficulty in dis­secting the penis in delayed cases and hence there is no optimum time and no emphasis on immediate surgery. Even though, ours is a small number of patients, the ob­servation supports that of Zargooshi. A large proportion of patients (71 %) presented late to us after sustaining pe­nile fracture. This is probably because this center is a re­ferral hospital and caters to a large number of rural population who defer the treatment for various reasons. Although patients can be discharged within 24 hours of surgery, our patients were discharged after 48 hours as the patients were from remote places and preferred to stay back for wound observation. All of our patients were in the younger age group ranging from 22-36 years: a period of maximum sexual activity. Surgical correction in the patients provides a shorter period of hospital stay, early resumption of work and sexual activities and thus less psychological trauma.


   Conclusions Top


The penile fractures mostly consist of a significant lac­eration of tunica albuginea with wide separation of torn edges. Surgical exploration can be considered in all cases of fracture penis to evacuate hematoma and repair tunica albuginea to minimize the subsequent scarring process that could ultimately lead to penile deformity. The procedure is simple with minimal morbidity even in delayed cases. The `time lag' factor need not be considered in planning the treatment for penile fracture. There is no evidence of increased risk of erectile dysfunction in patients with pe­nile fracture, undergoing delayed surgical repair[11].

 
   References Top

1.Cedron M, Whiemore KE, Carpiniello V, Kurzwell SJ, Hanno PM, Snyder HM et al. Traumatic rupture of the corpus cavernosum: evaluation and management. J Urol 1990; 144: 987-91.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.El-Bahansawy MS, Gomha MA. Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Int J Imp Res 2000; 12: 273-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Gontero P. Sidhu P, Muir GH. Penile fracture repair: assessment of early results and complications using color doppler ultrasound. Int J Imp Res 2000: 12: 125-9.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Narayansingh V, Raju JC. Fracture of the penis. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 309-16.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Kalash SS. Young JD. Fracture of the penis: controversy of surgi­cal versus conservative treatment. Urology 1984; 24: 21-4.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Cummings M. Parra RO, Boullier JA. Delayed repair of penile frac­ture. J Trauma 1998; 45: 153-4.  Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Penson DF. Seftel AD, Krane RJ, Frohrib D, Goldstein I. The hemodynamic pathophysiology of impotence following blunt trauma to the erect penis. J Urol 1992: 148: 1171-80.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Javaad Zargooshi. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: The long­term results of surgical treatment. Br J Urol 2002; 89: 890-4.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Asgari MA, Hossein SY, Safarinejad MR. Samadzedeh B, Bardideh AR. Penile fractures: evaluation, therapeutic approaches and long­term results. J Urol 1996; 155: 148-9.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Anselmo G. Fandell A, Faggiano L, Merlo F. Maccatrozzo L. Frac­tures of the penis: therapeutic approach and long-term results. Br J Urol 1991: 67: 509-11.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Kundu AK. Ghosh G, Kaviraj SP. Fracture penis: A complication of sildenafil citrate! Ind J Urol 2002; 18: 143-5.  Back to cited text no. 11    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Patients and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed7660    
    Printed72    
    Emailed5    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA