Indian Journal of Urology Users online:107  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Year : 2003  |  Volume : 20  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 18-22
 

Virtual cystoscopy - a promising diagnostic technique


Department of Urology,Government Royapettah Hospital, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
M G Rajamanickam
7, Anandan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic performance of virtual cystoscopy in patients with bladder diseases in comparison with conventional cystoscopy.
Methods: Fifteen patients with different bladder patho­logies underwent volumetric spiral CT of bladder after filling it with contrast media (GE medical system light speed multislice scanner). The data were transferred to Advantage workstation AW4.0-03 and virtual cystoscopy was performed using the special software (Navigator GE medical system). All the patients later underwent conven­tional cystoscopy and the findings of both investigations were compared.
Results: Virtual cystoscopy detected all 10 lesions with >5mm size and missed I out of 3 lesions with 5 5mm size. The overall sensitivity was 90%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100% and negative predic­tive value was 83.3%. The average time taken per proce­dure was 8 minutes. No complications of virtual cystoscopy were encountered in our study.
Conclusions: There seems to be good agreement as re­gards the site and size of lesions in both techniques. In the quest for a non-invasive investigation for assessment of bladder diseases, virtual cystoscopy is a promising tech­nology.


Keywords: Virtual endoscopy, bladder diseases.


How to cite this article:
Anand C, Sudhakar L, Sivasankaran G, Jayaganesh R, Ilangovan M, Muthulatha N, Rajamanickam M G, Emmanuel R. Virtual cystoscopy - a promising diagnostic technique. Indian J Urol 2003;20:18-22

How to cite this URL:
Anand C, Sudhakar L, Sivasankaran G, Jayaganesh R, Ilangovan M, Muthulatha N, Rajamanickam M G, Emmanuel R. Virtual cystoscopy - a promising diagnostic technique. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2003 [cited 2019 Jun 18];20:18-22. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2003/20/1/18/37118



   Introduction Top


In the science of medicine, there is a continuous search for noninvasive investigations to assess various illnesses.

In this quest virtual endoscopy is a promising technology. [1]

Cystoscopy plays a key role in the diagnosis of urinary bladder diseases. However, cystoscopy has its limitations. Moreover, it is an invasive investigation.

Recently three-dimensional computer rendering tech­niques with rapid image acquisition have made virtual re­ality imaging possible using a post processing technique done by computer software.[2] With commercially available software, virtual reality imaging allows interactive intra­luminal navigation through any hollow organs, simulating conventional endoscopy. [3],[4] This principle has been utilized to examine a number of anatomical areas like gastrointestinal tract, airways, urinary tract and other hol­low organs. [5]

We investigated the usefulness of virtual cystoscopy in the diagnosis of various bladder illnesses and compared it with conventional cystoscopy.


   Patients and Methods Top


During the study period (June 2001 to December 2001), 15 patients (13 men; 2 women; age range 41-70 years; mean age 56 years) were included in the study. These patients were randomly selected by draw of lots. The inclusion cri­terion was sonographic or other radiological evidence of bladder diseases. Patients who had undergone any form of endoscopic examination of urinary tract previously were excluded from the study.

After a scout view of pelvis the bladder was filled with diluted meglumine diatrizoate either through the Foley's catheter or suprapubic needle puncture (in 13 and 2 pa­tients respectively). Helical CT scans of bladder were ob­tained with 5 mm collimation, 5 mm/sec table feed and a 2 mm reconstruction interval using GE medical system light speed multislice scanner. CT cystographic data was re­constructed with perspective volume rendering by a im­age processing Advantage workstation AW4.0-03. Flying through approach aided by an endoscopic navigation sys­tem (Navigator: GE Medical System) was used for image analysis. The virtual cystoscopy was evaluated by a team of urologists and radiologists and all the findings and time taken for each procedure were recorded. Subsequently all patients were subjected for rigid cystoscopy (0°, 30° & 70° lens). The findings were compared.


   Results Top


Among 15 patients, 10 patients had bladder growth (13 growths; 7x1 and 3x2), two had bladder diverticulum and 1 had radiation cystitis. An incidental enlarged prostate in one patient was picked up by both modalities. In one pa­tient with bladder diverticulum virtual cystoscopy showed the direct entry of ureter into the diverticulum which could not be seen in rigid cystoscopy [Figure - 3]A&B. Two pa­tients with sonographic or urographic suspicion of blad­der pathology were found to have essentially normal bladder by both endoscopic studies and one among them was found to have upper tract TCC on further evaluation.

Total number of bladder lesions and mass lesions picked up by both investigations, location, gross appearance, size of mass and average time taken per procedure are given in [Table - 1].

Virtual cystoscopy could diagnose bladder lesions (irre­spective of size) with a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative pre­dictive value of 83.3%. In patients with growth of >5mm size, sensitivity and negative predictive value was 100%. In case of growths with 5mm or less in size the sensitivity was only 66.6%.

No complications of virtual cystoscopy was noticed in this study.


   Discussion Top


Virtual endoscopy is an area where modern computer technology and medicine have come together for the benefit of humankind. Since the original article by Vining,[6] there have been several studies about the utility of virtual cystoscopy. [7],[8],[9],[10]

In this study, we demonstrated that virtual cystoscopy is a feasible technique for evaluation of bladder pathol­ogy. The image qualities of virtual cystoscopy were gen­erally good and it was faster than conventional cystoscopy [Table - 1]. The biggest advantage of virtual cystoscopy is that it is noninvasive.[1] It reduces patient discomfort, anxiety and possible complications. [11] It allows accurate localiza­tion of a lesion and the shape and size measured by virtual cystoscopy is well correlated with conventional cystoscopic findings [Table - 1],[Figure - 1]A,B,[Figure - 2]A,B. Moreover, the size of growth is measured objectively in virtual cys­toscopy. [4]

Multiplanar images can be obtained by various radiographic modalities such as helical CT, MRI and ultrasonog­raphy. Currently, helical CT is most commonly employed for this purpose. Iodinated contrast media are more ben­eficial than air or CO 2 as the delineation of tiny bladder growths are better with contrast media. Air may leak from the bladder during the study, especially while changing the position .[4] Leak does not occur with contrast media. In addition, intravenous contrast was used in selected patients with upper tract dilatation. We used fly through approach for image analysis which gave a visual impression nearly same as that of a fibreoptic endoscopic procedure. This familiarity helps the urologists for better interpretation of results rather the other tedious and time consuming image analysis methods such as individual analysis of mathemati­cal divisions of images or visual analysis of the multiplanar 2D images. [5],[12] Virtual cystoscopy is more flexible and vir­tual camera can be rotated up to 360°, so that there is no inaccessible area in the bladder and even posterior view of the mass can be seen very well [11] [Figure - 4]A. Conven­tional cystoscopy does not give information regarding the depth of infiltration of tumour. In virtual cystoscopy it is possible to assess the depth because we are doing a helical CT. Moreover the wall of hollow organs can be made transparent to reveal relations with extraluminal structures. [5]

One of the patients in this study was in early postopera­tive period after total hip replacement and for him virtual cystoscopy was performed for hematuria and we could arrive at a possible diagnosis of radiation cystitis [Figure - 4]B (radiation 2 years back for carcinoma prostate). Cystos­copy which was done later confirmed the features of ra­diation cystitis. Two patients with bladder growth had associated urethral stricture which needed intervention before conventional cystoscopy. Virtual cystoscopy can therefore overcome physical constraints and can be done in patients who are not candidates for conventional cys­toscopy [11] and patients who can not be placed in lithotomy position. [4] Virtual endoscopy technique is useful in condi­tions where conventional cystoscopy is difficult such as to study the anatomy of pouches and neobladders. It may be clinically useful for surgical planning of lower abdomi­nal re-operations in patients with bladder substitutes. [13] Virtual examination of urethra, ureter and kidney can be performed but the image resolution of these studies are limited at present. [5]

There are several limitations of virtual cystoscopy. In our study virtual cystoscopy failed to detect a growth which was about 3 mm in size and surrounding carcinoma in situ changes in a patient. The current resolution of spiral CT does not allow reliable and consistent visualisation of small (<5 mm) lesions. [4] Reducing the slice thickness may im­prove resolution to a certain extent but increases the ra­diation dose to the patient. It has been estimated that absorbed radiation may be upto 40% higher for a multislice helical CT examination than for equivalent conventional CT scan. [18] This is of concern especially when using it as a screening procedure in the follow up of patients with TCC. [18] Virtual cystoscopy can not provide a histopatho­logical diagnosis. [5] Ureteric orifices are not clearly visual­ized in all patients. Another drawback of virtual cystoscopy is that it is more expensive for patients at present and the approximate cost of the software (Navigator GE medical system) is about Rs. 8 Lakhs.

Few limitations of our study are limited number of pa­tients and most of our patients had a previous sonological diagnosis of bladder pathology. However the interpreters of virtual cystoscopy were blinded to patient's history and previous investigation results.

Virtual simulators such as URO Mentor is commercially available and is being used for endourological training. [19],[20] As virtual dissection and resection is possible proposed surgeries can be practiced in virtual simulators. Surgical margins can be accurately assessed and differential tissue diagnosis can be made based upon spectral or other infor­mation contained in the patient specific images and mod­els. Virtual reality techniques will be useful in telesurgery and in robotic surgery in the future. [13],[14],[15],[16],[17]


   Conclusions Top


Virtual cystoscopy is in its infancy. Preliminary results in virtual cystoscopy are promising. Our study proves that virtual cystoscopy is a promising technique for use in de­tection of bladder lesions larger than 5 mm. Virtual cys­toscopy cannot replace conventional cystoscopy in all situations. It can serve better in selected conditions such as patient's refusal of an invasive diagnostic modality, patient unfit for conventional cystoscopy like distal obstruc­tion, presence of active haematuria, patients with bladder substitutions and early postoperative period. It can serve as a complementary examination performed between con­ventional cystoscopic examination in patients with blad­der tumour during follow-up. To determine the clinical value of routine CT virtual cystoscopy in all patients, how­ever, a large prospective study in the general patient popu­lation if necessary.

 
   References Top

1.Young GS. Silverman SG, Kettenbach J. Hata N, Golland P. Jolesz FA et al. Three dimensional computed tomography for planning urologic surgery. Urologic Clinics of North America. 1998: 25(1):103-111.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Stoll E. Stern C. Stucki P, Wildermuth S. A new filtering algorithm for medical magnetic resonance and computer tomography images. Journal of Digital Imaging. 1999; 12(1): 23-28.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Scholz M. Konen W, Tombrock S, Frick EB, Adams L, Vunduring M et al. Development of an endoscopic navigation system based on digital image processing. Computer Aided Surgery 1998; 3(3): 134-143.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Song JH. Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Mohsin J, Kielb SJ et al. Bladder tumour detection at virtual cystoscopy. Radiology 2001: 218(1): 95-100.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Assimos DG, Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy. Journal of Endourology 2001: 15(1): 47-51.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Vining DJ, Zagoria RJ, Liu K, Stelts D. CT cystoscopy: an innovation in bladder imaging. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 409-410.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Vining DJ. Virtual endoscopy: is it reality? Radiology 1996: 200:30-31.  Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Fenlon HM, Bell TV, Ahari HK, Hussain S. Virtual cystoscopy: early clinical experience. Radiology 1997; 205: 272-275.  Back to cited text no. 8  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
9.Tavernaraki AA, Stasinopoulou M, Deliveliotis C, Thanos Al, Sta­sis A, Pavlopoulos SA. Virtual cystoscopy early clinical experi­ence. Radiology 1998; 209: 592.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Rubin GD, Beaulieu LF, Argiro V et al. Perspective volume ren­dering of CT and MRI images; applications in endoscopic imaging. Radiology 1996: 199: 321-330.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Blezek DJ, Robb RA. Evaluating virtual endoscopy for clinical use. Journal of Digital Imaging 1997 10(l); 51-55.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Robb RA, Aharon S, Cameron BM. Patient specific anatomic models from three dimensional medical image data for clinical applica­tions in surgery and endoscopy. Journal of Digital Imaging 1997; 10 (3 suppl 1): 31-35.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Stenzl A, Frank R, Eder R, Recheis W. Knapp R, Nedden ZD et al. 3-dimensional computerised tomography and virtual reality endos­copy of the reconstructed lower urinary tract. J Urol 1998: 159(3): 741-746.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Kuo RL, Delvecchio FC, Preminger GM. Virtual reality : Current urologic applications and future developments. Journal of Endo­urology 2001; 15(1): 117-122.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Kvedar JC, Menn E, Loughlin KR. Telemedicine present applica­tions and future prospects. Urologic Clinics of North America 1998: 25(l): 137-147.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Cadeddu JA, Stoianovici D, Kavoussi LR. Robotic surgery in urol­ogy. Urologic Clinics of North America 1998 25(1): 75-84.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Shah J, Mackay S, Vale J, Darzi A. Simulation in urology : a role for virtual reality ? BJU Int 2001; 88: 661-665.  Back to cited text no. 17  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]
18.Jones AP, Jenkins PP, Robinson AR, Allan PL, Whitehouse RW, Wright AR. Recent technical advances. In : David Sutton, editor, Text book of Radiology and Imaging. 7th edition. Churchill Livingstone 2003; Vol.2: 1819-1845.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Michel MS, Knoll T, Kohrmann KU, Alken P. The Uro Mentor : development and evaluation of a new computer based interactive training system for virtual life-like simulation of diagnostic and therapeutic endourological procedures. BJU Int 2002; 89: 174-177.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Davies RJ, Hamdorf JM. Surgical skills training and the role of skill centres. BJU Int 2003; 91(1): 3-4.  Back to cited text no. 20    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3], [Figure - 4]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table - 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Introduction
    Patients and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3886    
    Printed121    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA