Indian Journal of Urology Users online:651  
IJU
Home Current Issue Ahead of print Editorial Board Archives Symposia Guidelines Subscriptions Login 
Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
CASE REPORT
Year : 2002  |  Volume : 18  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 179-181
 

Abnormal bone scan : Importance of clinical correlation


Department of Urology & Uro-Oncology, PD Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai, India

Correspondence Address:
V Srinivas
P.D. Hinduja National Hospital & Medical Research Centre, V.S. Marg, Mahim, Mumbai - 400 016
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

 
   Abstract 

A case of renal cell carcinoma which was diagnosed to have metastatic disease on the basis of two hot spots in ribs on bone scan, is presented. After careful and thor­ough history, it turned out to be fracture ribs which oc­curred due to bad positioning during radical nephrectoiny. This case highlights the importance of clinical judgement especially in the modern era of sophisticated investiga­tions.


Keywords: Renal Cell Carcinoma; Bone Scan; Metastasis


How to cite this article:
Singh DR, Gaitonde K, Santoshi N, Patil N, Srinivas V. Abnormal bone scan : Importance of clinical correlation. Indian J Urol 2002;18:179-81

How to cite this URL:
Singh DR, Gaitonde K, Santoshi N, Patil N, Srinivas V. Abnormal bone scan : Importance of clinical correlation. Indian J Urol [serial online] 2002 [cited 2019 Aug 18];18:179-81. Available from: http://www.indianjurol.com/text.asp?2002/18/2/179/37638



   Case Report Top


A 45-year-old male patient underwent a right radical nephrectomy in November 2000 at an outside hospital. The histology showed an encapsulated renal cell carci­noma which was moderately differentiated with negative hilar nodes. A preoperative bone scan had not been done as the alkaline phosphatase was normal and the patient did not have bone pain.

The patient developed pain over the left lower ribs, post­operatively. It was severe in intensity and required anal­gesics for control. His repeat alkaline phosphatase was normal and a bone scan done showed two hot spots over the left 10 th and 11 th ribs [Figure - 1]. A diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma was made and he was referred to us for further management.

The patient came to see us one month after his radical nephrectomy to discuss the treatment options for meta­static renal cell carcinoma. On reviewing the bone scan [Figure - 1], the two distinct hot spots were well seen and the physical examination was unremarkable except for ten­derness over these two areas.

However on close questioning it was apparent that the patient became aware of acute, severe pain in this area immediately after the anesthesia wore off and this pain was more intense than that of the surgical wound.

A working diagnosis of fracture ribs was made and this was confirmed by plain X-ray [Figure - 2] and CT scan [Figure - 3] which showed a fracture with callus surrounding it.

A rib biopsy was not done to definitely exclude malig­nancy. However the patient responded well to conserva­tive treatment and became asymptomatic in one month's time. Follow-up X-ray 3 months later showed a well-healed fracture.


   Discussion Top


The visualization of a hot spot even in an individual with a known carcinoma, is not specific for metastatic dis­ease although the probability is very high especially when multiple lesions are noted. The shape of the abnormality may be valuable since a metastatic deposit invading along a rib becomes elongated while a rib fracture tends to be significantly more focal. Overall 55% of solitary bone scan abnormalities are caused by neoplastic disease and 25% by trauma. Among patients with known primary tumors, 70% rib lesions are malignant. [1]

Our case is interesting since the hot spots in the ribs were initially thought to be metastatic and the patient had been advised chemotherapy. It is difficult to categorically rule out a malignancy unless a bone biopsy is done, but this has added complications. [2] However by obtaining a thorough history, the possibility of a rib fracture occuring while positioning the patient for a flank incision became apparent. This enabled us to avoid a rib biopsy and treat him conservatively with a successful outcome.

This case highlights the importance of taking a good clinical history even in this modern era of sophisticated investigations, as occasionally an unusual pathology will emerge and a patient need not be labeled as having incur­able metastatic disease.

 
   References Top

1.Vander Wall H. Evaluation of Malignancy : Metastatic bone dis­ease. In : Murray IPC. Ell PJ (eds.). Nuclear medicine in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Churchill Livingstone. 2: 1171-1172.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Kattapuram SV. Rosenthal DI. Percutaneous biopsy of skeletal le­sions. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 935-942.  Back to cited text no. 2    


    Figures

  [Figure - 1], [Figure - 2], [Figure - 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article

    

 
   Search
 
   Next article
   Previous article 
   Table of Contents
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    [PDF Not available] *
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Case Report
    Discussion
    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3889    
    Printed72    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded0    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

HEALTHWARE INDIA